2a. If 80-85% of the sunlight were blocked from Earth, crop production would go down. Sunlight sustains all plants, and many would die from the lack thereof. For an earthworm, this means that the soil would lose its nutrients. Although after the plants died they would provide an immediate food source, this food source would eventually disappear, causing the earth worms to die off. The shark population would react in the same way. The immediate lack of sunlight would cause many fish to die, however after this source disappeared, the sharks would have little to feed on. The maple tree would slowly die because its source of sunlight was cut off. A saguaro cactus would be able to survive quite a while. Although it is used to a large amount of sunlight, and losing that sunlight would be a change, the cactus could survive off of its stored amount of water. However after this supply ran out, the cactus would die. A teenager would be affected by the sunlight in his/her mood. As the sky darkens, so would the outlook they had on everything …show more content…
When the sunlight was blocked from the Earth, the producers would die. The sun is their source of food and it sustains them. This would lead to a collapse in the consumers, because their source of sustainment then is gone. Both of these deaths would result in a large amount of food for the decomposers. Eventually, after all the producers and consumers are gone, the decomposers would die off. As each level of the food chain died off, the cycling of matter would cease as well. Resulting from the deaths of first the producers, then the consumers, and finally the decomposers, all the life on the planet would no longer exist. This would stop the flow of matter all over the world.
2c. Competition between the sprouts would arise as they grew more. In addition, the amount of resources needed to sustain each tree would decrease, causing fewer and fewer to be able to survive. This would minimize the amount down to 1-2 trees that
The cycling of matter if the sun was blocked would be put to a halt. In a world without sunlight dead organisms would just be laying around and waste would
The decimation of the ecosystem was caused by the things that Columbus brought from the Old World such as livestock, rabbits, and diseases that were new to the natives. This caused death for many of
A more long term effect would be stunted tree growth because trees need sunlight to grow
Animals like killer whales depend on seals for food. If the seals disappear, the killer whales will also start to die of because of starvation. Some fish species will become overpopulated. This is because there won’t be any seals to eat them, and then that
When a certain species is removed from their ecosystem, it can have effects on their prey and their predators. Their prey’s population would increase, and their predator’s population would decrease due to their being nothing for it to eat.
Today, however, it's a different matter. It is not the loss of billions, it will not be the shortage of food, and it will not be violent riots and civil unrest, which kills the most people. No, it will be the lack of electricity and lack of access to technology that will be the most devastating in the short-term, because people will not be able to get their government check, their medical care, and their food stamps, cell phones, free heating oil, and food from food banks, which they so rely on today.
Otherwise, without sharks, the ocean biological system will be unbalanced, thus affecting the entire food chain. If the populations of planktons or other small creatures increase, consequences will follow. The control and management of the oceans will be tougher if the population of small fishes were to greatly increase. The outbreak of diseases in the ocean will be induced and this may spread to rivers and lakes which will ultimately affect us since our drinking water would become
Plants and vegetation are mandatory to human survival and will impact the earth dramatically if they were to all
Eventually people would just go extinct because of the dearth of
If sharks go extinct it can cause a disastrous effect on the food chain; coral reefs could possibly die and fisheries could collapse. Keeping sharks alive helps keep a healthy and regular balance in marine life. The oceans
Ecosystems are composed of a predator prey relationships that help keep balance within it. Without predators the prey population would rise to a point where the ecosystem does not have enough resources to support them, causing starvation and eventually death within the population. The population would get to a point where there is
When those other sources run out it is just minimal time before the small animals die out as well. As time goes on things disappear, and are destructed by the wrath of time. Cities slowly fall apart, human existence gone, and now no animals roaming the earth we once lived upon. The change that happens is up to your point of view. The change can be positive; because with humans off earth it can go back to the way it was before, clean, and healthy.
Regarding the circumstances the plant will not grow as they do not have the ‘“sunshine” to do
Despite animals bring a superior capability to adjust what happens over plants do, they might also die. When the animals and plants die, the public loses two sources of food, plant nourishment and animal nourishment. They might additionally lose their homes. Hence as an result, they might take off those region or die. This would be called a breakage in the food chain, ultimately one thing leads to another thing and so on and so forth.
A large population especially those residing near the coastal area would become homeless. Some people would have access to luxuries of life while the rest of the people would have to fight for the basic human necessities for their families. This un-equality would result in increased crime rate in society. All in all, the humanity would face a tremendous disaster if the necessary measures are not taken in order to control the activities causing global warming. As well as, there should be a struggle to counterbalance its effects.