Marriage Act 2013
Marriage Same Sex Couples Act 2013- Separate not Equal.
The act has afforded Same Sex couples the ability to marry, however discrimination is evident since the rights which accompany this are not equal to those which accompany heterosexual marriage.
The Marriage Same Sex Couples Act 2013, hereafter referred to as the Act 2013, is an important piece of legislation as it signifies the move toward acceptance of different lifestyles and seems to adhere to the separation of church and state. It has enabled persons who are of a homosexual or transgender orientation to elevate their relationship to the status of marriage. The Act 2013 has afforded same sex couples the ability to marry in civil ceremonies, they may be turned away by religious organizations,
…show more content…
Two of the historically recognized grounds for annulment of marriage, non-consummation and adultery, explicitly do not apply to marriages recognized by the Act 2013. The ‘quadruple lock’ of protections, that is built into the primary legislation, allows for the ‘opt in’ mechanism for religious organizations has made it agreeable that the Church of England and the Church in Wales are explicitly banned from performing same-sex marriages, even if they desire to do so. There are harsher requirements for same-sex marriage with reference to registering premises, especially in regards of shared faith premises, than there are for heterosexual marriage. It is the view of certain activists, such as Peter Tatchell, that inheritance rights for same-sex marriage spouses are unequal to that of heterosexual marriage spouses. The requirements of the spousal permission for a Gender Recognition Certificate, in many authorities opinion, this amounts to a ‘spousal veto.’ The legislation does not repeal the ban on Civil Partnerships not extending to heterosexual couples, in a society which favours cohabiting-love relationships rather marriage, this seems certainly discriminatory. In the United Kingdom the Act 2013 signifies a great stride toward equality, but does not embody it as the previous mentioned factors attribute for the issues of discrimination and inequality. The factors are those which will be examined in this paper to assess the imbalance in the law between same-sex marriages and heterosexual
Legal Case: Thea V. Windsor
293 Words | 2 PagesSince the 1970’s people have been going to court to ask the government to legalize gay marriage. From the cases in 1970’s like Loving v. Virginia and the more recent cases like United States v. Edith Windsor. In this case, Windsor and Thea were a same sex couple who were married in Canada, but they lived in New York which recognized their marriage. After Thea passed away, the estate was left with Windsor. Under federal law their marriage was not recognized, so Windsor was asked to pay taxes on the estate.
Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
409 Words | 2 PagesObergefell v. Hodges (2014) The Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) case involved the marriage of same sex couples. Groups of same sex couples sued their state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of them refusing to recognize legal same sex marriages. Plaintiffs argued that the states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
971 Words | 4 PagesIn my brief I will explore the effect of the Loving V. Virginia (1967) on the case of Obergefell V. Hodges (2015) and how it led to legalization of same sex marriage. I will prove that the 9th amendment which addresses the right to marriage did not specify that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I will also prove that the precedents set by prior cases reflected on the decision of the supreme justice. I will first explain the prior cases and discuss their rulings and reflect on the reason judges chose this. I will then discuss the Obergefell v. Hodges case and its similarity to prior cases .
Rhetorical Analysis Of Susie O Brien
762 Words | 4 PagesSusie O'Brien's article 'It's time to honour gay couples and allow them to marry' (The Advertiser, November 20, 2010, p. 27) is arguing the side of pro-gay marriage in the debate of marriage equality. This argument is made using ethos, logos, pathos and suggestive language as to guide you to her side of the argument. Susie begins by talking about herself and her experience on the subject of whether or not she had a choice when growing up straight or gay. She demonstrates her knowledge on the topic by referencing her personal history; however not truly showing why her opinion should be listening to rather than others. Her argument is very personally based and draws examples such as herself and her family or friends.
Obergefell V. Hodges (2015)
677 Words | 3 PagesThis paper focuses on the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). This paper will give an overview of the case, the major arguments made by the plaitiffs and the defendents, as well as how the case has affected other rulings. This case has answered many legal questions and will shape any future cases that deal with gay marriage, possibly even equal rights. Deatiled CH: James Obergefell and John Arthur was a same-sex couple and was married on July 11, 2013 on a medical transport plan on the tarmac at the airport in Baltimore, Maryland due to Arthur being unable to move (3,2) .
Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
1057 Words | 5 PagesThe Supreme Court kept referring back to the Loving v. Virginia case because both cases had the same principles which were equality and not having the right to marriage. According to the Supreme Court “These new insights have strengthened, not weakened, the institution of marriage.” Also “Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” These liberties include certain personal choices which include intimate choices. Marriage is coming together for better or for worse and same sex couples should have the same right as
Obergefell V. Hodges (2005)
2137 Words | 9 PagesHodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial
Full Faith And Credit Clause Analysis
835 Words | 4 PagesAlthough marriage and civil unions should be recognized under the Full Faith and Credit Clause it was not because this clause was primarily used for judicial rulings and was not thought to apply to marriages or civil union licenses. This deals with the recognition of same sex marriages in states, it also deals with the relationship between states. At the time some states such as New York recognized same-sex civil marriages but whether these unions were recognized in other states was an entirely different story. This went on for a while until it was determined that DOMA was not only discriminatory but also went against the Full Faith and Credit
Obergefell V. Hodges: A Case Study
88 Words | 1 PagesIn 2015, the United States Supreme Court worked on Obergefell v. Hodges, a case regarding the legality of same sex marriage. Over 9 million people in the united states identify and associate themselves with the LGBTQ+ community. These members and others in the past have fought for their constitutional rights since before the 1950’s. The legalization of same-sex marriage under the United States Constitution is beneficial to the nation, as it has positively influenced members of the LGBTQ+ community and their families, the nation’s economy, and it’s reputation.
Sam Cooke Meaning
984 Words | 4 PagesAnother stride was the Defense of Marriage Act being struck down in 2012, which allowed same sex
Gay Rights Vs. The Civil Rights Movement
902 Words | 4 PagesThe Civil Rights Movement gained traction around the 1950s, paving the way for many other oppressed groups. These groups fought for different rights, but they still had a similar struggle to the original movement. One of these groups is the Gay Rights Movement. The comparison between the black civil rights movement and the gay civil rights movement is “typically a sensitive subject, even among liberals” (Williams). Some people believe that it is unfair to compare a fight for marriage to a fight to gain equality in every aspect.
Satirical Essay On Gay Equality
482 Words | 2 PagesYay! Marriage equality! After such a long and difficult fight for LGBTQ+ rights the battle is finally ended, thanks to the Supreme Court decision. Or is it? Even though all couples can now be legally joined, they can also be legally discriminated against the day after their wedding.
Health Disparities In The LGBT Community
899 Words | 4 PagesThe focus of this paper is to shed light to the fact that there are health disparities within the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans* (LGBT) population. When a couple is granted the right to marry, it becomes possible for health insurance companies to recognize that. As a result, all family members are covered by whoever’s employer offers the best plan. Married couples and families are then able to access health care when needed. Whereas heterosexual couples who are married and have families are able to be on one joint health insurance plan, LGBT couples do not have the same luxury.
Gay Marriage Persuasive Research Paper Outline
1612 Words | 7 PagesJoey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.
Alexis De Tocqueville
809 Words | 4 PagesEveryone should be able to receive the same benefits and acceptance regardless of their sexuality so granting legal marriage rights under the law must extend to gays and lesbians to ensure that all citizens enjoy full human
More about Marriage Act 2013
Legal Case: Thea V. Windsor
293 Words | 2 PagesObergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
409 Words | 2 PagesObergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
971 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Susie O Brien
762 Words | 4 PagesObergefell V. Hodges (2015)
677 Words | 3 PagesObergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
1057 Words | 5 PagesObergefell V. Hodges (2005)
2137 Words | 9 PagesFull Faith And Credit Clause Analysis
835 Words | 4 PagesObergefell V. Hodges: A Case Study
88 Words | 1 PagesSam Cooke Meaning
984 Words | 4 PagesGay Rights Vs. The Civil Rights Movement
902 Words | 4 PagesSatirical Essay On Gay Equality
482 Words | 2 PagesHealth Disparities In The LGBT Community
899 Words | 4 PagesGay Marriage Persuasive Research Paper Outline
1612 Words | 7 PagesAlexis De Tocqueville
809 Words | 4 Pages