QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Under Alabama’s burglary statute, does a former occupant of an apartment who partially moved out four to five days before committing a felony in the apartment and who has a estranged relationship with the occupant have an absolute right to enter?
BRIEF ANSWER
1. Probably not. A person has an absolute right to enter as long as he remains an occupant of the apartment, ownership is irrelevant, and an estranged marital relationship is not sufficient. Hawthorn had moved out of the apartment four to five days prior to the incident which is probably a sufficient amount of time for the courts to rule he was no longer an occupant. Additionally, his estranged relationship with Evergreen, his ex-fiancé, is not enough to constitute an absolute right to enter. Therefore, Hawthorn likely did not have an absolute right to enter.
DISCUSSION
Alabama’s burglary statute states:
A person commits an offense if, without authority, he enters or remains in a building or habitable structure with intent to commit an offense therein. Ala. Code § 13 A-7-7 (2000). A person enters without authority when he does not have either an absolute or conditional right to enter. Gauze v. State, 542 So. 2d 1365 (Ala. 1975). This memorandum will look at whether Hawthorn had an absolute right
…show more content…
In our case Hawthorn was entering the apartment of his ex-fiancé. This relationship with the current occupant does not help establish an absolute right. In fact, Hawthorn’s relationship with Evergreen, his ex-fiancé, is significantly weaker than the estranged marriages found in both Sears and Davenport. Because estranged marriages were not enough to establish an absolute right, there is even less of a chance that Hawthorn’s broken off engagement would grant him an absolute
The judges quoted “section 83.51 of the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act demands that reasonable provisions ought to be made for locks and keys in order to ensure a safe common area environment as part of the responsibilities of the landlord under the lease agreement.” Polly Suzanne Paterson v. Kent C. Deeb, Transamerica Insurance Co., W. Fenton Langston, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., 472 So.2d 1210 (Fla.App.1 Dist. 1985). In the Parker claim, Vista failed to provide reasonable provisions for the locks, particularly, an aspect that resulted in a highly insecure common area that would be accessible by strangers using their credit cards to card into the apartment. The assailant who physically assaulted and robbed Parker had gained access into the building owing to the faulty nature of the deadbolt lock. The standard lock was not sufficient as a measure of ensuring the security of the tenants and their properties.
The court found that the vehicle was not locked, because no force was needed and no seals were broken to gain entry. Id. at
Although there was no threat of physical harm, there was a threat to his liberty if he left. Merchant threatened to call the police on Driver, which constitutes a threat to his liberty and freedom. If there is a threat to the person being detained, this contributes to the false imprisonment claim. Furthermore, Merchant originally had shopkeeper’s privilege, but lost it after detaining Driver for an unreasonable amount of time. Summary of the
Ogden vs. Gibbons was a controversial court case that was debated in 1824 after Aaron Ogden filed a restraint against Thomas Gibbons. Ogden and Gibbons were former business partners in the steamboat industry and for three years they successfully worked together throughout waterways in New York. Unfortunately Gibbons decided to operate another steamboat that came in conflict with Ogden’s steamboat and this is when Ogden filed a restraint against Gibbons. Ogden’s complaint was that he no longer wanted Gibbons to operate steamboats in New York waters. This was an important court case because the court had to figure out who had the power to control navigation in interstate waterways.
The Australian, p.11. Mabo and Others v. The State of Queensland [1992]175 CLR 1 F.C. 92/014 No. 2 (Judge Brennan).
Finally, it reflects the constitutionally entrenched right to seek justice in the Courts and their role in upholding the rule of law. II. Background In November, 2004, armed officers forcibly entered the appellants’
Presenting Concerns/ Referral Statement Samuel, however, he goes by Sam, is an 18 year old cis-gender heterosexual African American male. Sam has agreed to undergo this clinical interview as and educational learning opportunity. Sam is a freshman attending Chatham University. He is a double major, studying Chemistry and Biology. Sam has career aspirations of earning a Medical Doctorate (MD) and Doctorate of Philosophy Ph.D. in Public Health from one of the Historically Black College and Universities (HBCU).
Marron Law, LLC is a law firm that is located in Hillsboro, Oregon. Their areas of practice include residential and commercial construction law, insurance law, trade secrets, franchise law, commercial lease law, commercial disputes, and real estate. Marron Law, LLC works on franchise law including contracts, sales and termination practices, and equal treatment of franchisees. Marron Law, LLC represents both the commercial and residential tenants and building owners with their evictions cases and rent disputes. This law firm helps the businesses and business owners in commercial disputes involving contracts, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and insurance disputes.
Everyone was living in a small living space for weeks. People’s property is theirs, and they should be able to do as they please with it. No one should interfere with a person’s home without
In the past, they followed the words of the law quite literally. This meant that someone had to physically break into a place to be charged with burglary. However, today's courts understand that burglary can occur even without a forced entry. Threats can also qualify, making the crime more than just about breaking and entering.
Mr. Boyd reported that the marriage began to deteriorate within a couple of years after the birth of Annick. He indicated that Ms. How-Boyd behavior and conduct changed, she became more aggressive towards myself and our child. In addition, the mother left the child home unattended when Annick was eight years old. He stated that she had never done such a thing before, he assumed that Ms. How-Boyd must have been called into work at the last minute. He reported that Annick called him to tell him that she was home alone.
5 of the worst mothers-in-law we’ve ever heard of (-- removed HTML --) We’ve all seen the movie Monster in Law, sparking a deep fear of the mother of any guy you start dating. While it may seem like just a Hollywood tale, the vengeful mother-in-law is a real problem that many women are forced to deal with. If you think your mother-in-law is bad, just be thankful she isn’t like one of these moms. 1. The religious one Holding a different religion from your partner’s family can be difficult.
“There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.
This all happened due to the fact that her mother and father refused to lock the doors
If thieves see a chance to easily steal something, they will not think twice about it and have zero guilt because in their minds. For example, if they steal a bicycle from a front porch they will blame the owner for leaving it outside and think the person deserved to have their bike stolen. Boba and Santos wrote an article about theft and mentioned that thieves calculate risk versus reward (2008). That applies directly to this situation. If someone were home at the time, the theft would have never occurred because the risk level would be too high.