Samurai and Knights were two very powerful groups of warriors that existed thousands of years ago to protect the lands because of a dysfunctional central government. In Europe, knights were made by the government to protects the lords of lands because they could not protect it without the government's help. Later, Japan would end up doing the same things, but without the government's permission. The samurai started out as mere mercenaries, hired by the daimyo to protect their lands, and similarly to the knights, in return for land. Later they made a powerful and organised government that took over all of Japan. In Europe, the knights were strong warrior from the government that were given to lords and made personal protectors of that and their lands. Although some people say that they have almost no difference but I disagree. …show more content…
The armor for the samurai was light and easy to move in. While the knight armor was heavy and rather difficult to be inside of. Samurai had an exposed arm, making it easier to pull back an arrow from a bow. Although they used metal armor like the knights, the samurai tied multiple plates together that made up the light armor. A disadvantage of samurai armor is that if they got wet the silk or leather cords that kept the plates together would make them very heavy and difficult to move in. Although the knights used metal armor, it was very heavy and covered the whole body, making it easier to deflect arrows and or crossbows that were becoming very popular to use during that time. The only openings in a knight’s armor were grooves in the helmet that an arrow couldn’t even fit in. Armor was only was one of the many
Both Samurai and Knights were forced to be loyal to their masters. Training started at a young age, but loyalty started even younger. The top priority in Japan and Europe wasn't the ability to fight well it was more of the ability to stick out the battle with the master. Many problems would occur if either the samurai or the knight were
Throughout the years, both Japan and Europe turned into a Chaotic mess, around the same time. In the late 400’s the Roman empire had fallen, leaving Divided and weekend kingdoms. On the other side of the world, Japan was having some similar issues. The Japanese emperors and the Imperial Court we're both challenged by the rise of Clans. Despite religion, Samurai and knights are more similar than different.
The knight had to change their armor because of the new weapons, and for more protection the knight had changed their armor to covering their whole body so their foot, their head, and their legs. The samurai had armor that had iron scales tied together, lacquered, and then bound into armor plates with silk or leather cords.(I got my information in document D) they also had their right arm free so they can draw their bow faster. The samurai training started out with childhood school with unique combination of physical training, poetry training and spiritual training. When they were young they studied kendo the art of fencing, with bamboo sticks. The moral code of the samurai, and zen buddhism.
Samurais and knights have many differences, but also share many traits. One difference is that Samurais have better armor than the knights due. This armor allows the samurais to use their right arm while the knight's arms are enclosed in their armor. As stated in document D, “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm so they can easily draw their bow.” Another difference that they have with their armor is in Document D it states, “The knights’ armors weighed about 40 to 60 pounds (heavier than the samurai's armor)”
Samurai and Knights DBQ From approximately 1000 - 1600 CE, a class of warriors arose, they swore oaths of loyalty and they fought for their kings to keep them safe. These warriors were called the Samurai and Knights. The Samurai fought for the Japanese and the Knights fought for Europe. They are both warriors fighting for their people.
The Samurai VS The Knight Knights and samurais both had the job to serve their country, nation, etc. In short a knight was a warrior who owed loyalty & military service to their lord for land, and a samurai were warriors who also owed loyalty and military service to their daimyo (Lords interpreted in the Japanese feudal system) for land and regular payment. Now even though knights and samurais had some form of power, in Japanese feudalism, the samurais had more power compared to the knights, hence I can conclude that they were more superior, but there’s a lot more to this entire comparison than just that! Anyhow, let me explain how samurais were more superior than knights.
Samurai and Knight society, beliefs, and training were very similar to each other during this time. In the late 400’s when there were rulers and a social class, Japan and Europe both had a relatable social pyramid. These two pyramids, have an almost spitting image of each other, excluding the names. In the Japanese society, as stated in Document A, the top of the society was the emperor, who had symbolic power.
And knights had a code called, Chivalry. If a knight had fallen of their horse in a battle, the knight would be more vulnerable than a samurai because the knight had more armour. The social order in feudal Samurai ranked higher than the Knights. For both samurais and knights, honor was important.
In this case the Japan and Europe are being classified. The samurais and knights are more alike than different mostly because of the social positions in their communities when they are classified on the social pyramids of Japan for the Samurai and Europe for the Knight. In one of the documents I have read (Document A) it shows the Classification for Japan and Europe. The Samurai and the Knight are both classified in the middle of each pyramid underneath the Shogun and the King but above the peasants in both societies. Also in Document B with Catharina Blomberg as the source it talks about being loyal to their lords.
The knights had a code they lived by. Honor, bravery, chivalry, and courtesy. This code was called knightly chivalry. The monarchy also brought the artisan class and changed the attitude toward the church and religion.
Tokugawa Japan + Medieval Europe Medieval Europe and Tokugawa Japan lived in seclusion to each other, and yet there were many uncanny similarities between Tokugawa Japan and Medieval Europe. In Medieval Europe there were many key features of the social system that were introduced at the time. The social system of Medieval Europe was called Feudalism. Feudalism puts the King in charge of everything and everyone, with barons and nobles underneath him. The nobles provide loyalty and knights to the king in return for land to control.
According to charts from various sources, samurai and knights are around the same rankings in a social pyramid (Doc. A). Both the samurai and knight are lower in the social pyramids at the time. They were both paid for their service with land from the lord he was working for. Another similarity is said in “The Heart of a Warrior: Origins and Religious Background of the Samurai System in Feudal Japan,” by Catharina Blomberg.
Samurai and Knights DBQ From about 1000 - 1600 CE, samurai warriors in Japan and knights in Europe formed the military of both places. Samurai were professional warriors that protected their territory. Knights were warriors that fought on horseback,their were very powerful because of there training. The similarities between the knights and samurai can be seen in their training, armor and the codes of both europe and Japan.
Youssef Marakby ID:900130817 Instructor: Richard Byford Rhet 1020 The Samurai’s affect on Japan’s culture For many years, the legendary Japanese samurai warriors showed that they are the most well known class of ancient Japan and also known with their supremacy of honor, service, and duty which the Japanese society still have today. The samurai helped lay the foundations of Japan 's culture.
All of this leads to an impact on military, feudalistic society and Japan’s history. To commence, Samurai’s are important in Japanese history because they helped start feudalism and the Shogun’s rule. It all started when the central government had no authority over the large landowners. The Daimyo refused to pay their taxes, so when the Jurisdiction came to collect, the daimyo had this huge army of Samurais.