The article I picked from The Washington Post is about Sarah Henderson, a woman in Texas who shot her two children. Jacob Henderson, the father of the 5 and 7-year-old girls had called the police at 11:30 that evening because he believed his wife was suicidal. A few minutes later he called again and said that his wife was fine and not to send anyone out. At about 2:30 in the morning the woman’s husband called the police yet again, this time because his wife had shot their daughters. In the 9-1-1 audio, the wife can be heard saying “What did I do” & “Why did I do that”. The article says that in court the woman admitted that she had been planning to kill her children for two weeks, but she also planned to kill her husband along with them, but …show more content…
She clearly made the decision to do so two weeks prior when she planned to kill her daughters as well as her husband. The article also mentioned that Sarah’s wife Jacob had called the police because he believed she was suicidal. According to Cornish & Clarke in reference to rational choice theory Sarah Henderson’s suicidal tendencies may be explained of previous experiences, which would make her decision to commit suicide and/or kill her daughters a decision that was not purely …show more content…
The article states that the first time the police were called it was because Jacob Henderson believed his wife was suicidal and then later after she shot her daughters she was trying to strangle herself and pry the gun away from her husband. Clearly there is something uncontrollably abnormal within her brain to make her go through with her plan to kill her children and attempt to kill her husband and herself. In my opinion, a major factor of this crime in regard to Sarah’s psychological problems is that her crime was premeditated rather than in the heat of passion. It is hard for me to believe that a mother who has no cognitive dysfunction would be able to plan to kill her children for two weeks before actually committing the crime and then show no remorse about it in
Ever since the women on The Real Housewives of Orange County started saying that Brooks Ayers doesn 't really have cancer everyone has wondered why Vicki Gunvalson has been quiet about it all. Vicki and Brooks were still together at first, but now they have split and she is still not sharing her thoughts on the cancer scandal or Brooks. Radar Online shared that Vicki Gunvalson actually can 't talk bad about Brooks or share her thoughts due to a legal contract that the two signed when they first started dating. This contract also protected Vicki from Brooks talking bad about her. An insider actually shared about the document that Vicki and Brooks signed when they started dating.
A system of law in America that we believe to find justice every time does it exists? Well many times we have seen suspects get away with a crime and the victims know what happened and justice wasn’t achieved. The court, in the case of Sibyl Danforth coming to court for manslaughter came to the proper conclusion and found justice in the trial of Sibyl Danforth vs. the State of Vermont. In some court room’s justice isn’t always found.
Prosecutor Park Dietz had claimed in his testimony that Andrea had gotten her idea to drown the children from an episode of Law and Order, in which a woman drowned her own children but got away with it through the insanity defense. The producers of the television show later came forward and stated that no such episode existed, Dietz simply melded together parts of separate programs. The Texas Court of Appeals decided that was reason enough for a retrial, considering the jury’s difficult primary decision could have been biased by false information. So, on June 26, 2006, five years after her sentencing to life in prison, Andrea’s retrial began. The prime reason why it is so difficult to declare someone not guilty by reason of insanity in Texas is the M’Naghten Rule.
Banks expanded her argument with a strong pathos by providing coherent details on the scenarios she mentioned of police shootings, which may lead to feelings of disturbance, trauma, and beyond belief for the ones reading. Perhaps, the extensive detail she gave when she was describing the scene at Minnesota, "a police officer held the pair at gunpoint and her 4-year-old daughter watched from the back seat." (Banks) The author portrays the officer as a selfish, cold-hearted man because, regardless of the situation, a child should never be traumatized with such disturbing image as is witnessing a gun pointed at their parents. Pathos was used a long way, as Banks intended the audience to agree that officers lack consideration of others.
Shahad Jadallah English 1301 Ms. Dies 20 October 2015 Social Classes In my analysis of Dee Dee Myers’s “Politico”, I argue that the article does not meet the standards for publication in The Shorthorn for many reasons. In the article Myers only gives one side of the argument; she makes the wealthy republicans seem that they get so many benefits with taxes and that they don’t want to help anyone else besides themselves. Since Myers is a democrat she lacks some input from the republican side to balance out the argument. In this biased article, Myers is trying to persuade the reader to what she believes.
Andrea Yates case is known as one of the horrifying murderer events that had happened in Texas. Also she is the most hated woman in the United States because of her cruel crime, of murdering her five children one by one in the bathtub just because she thinks that they were doomed to hell because their parents sins. Yates was treated for postpartum depression and psychosis illnesses that ran in her family, meaning that based on these facts on the mental problem that she had and her family where the reason why she murder her own children’s. Referring to all these facts on the case of Andrea Yates whether or not she is culpable being insane at the time of her crime offense of murdering her kids, I believe that she was under a period of mental problem at the time of her offense. Referring to the website biography.com “ Andrea Yates Biography”.
Columbine was a very tragic event. The Colombine shooting was when two teens, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, went on a shooting spree in their high school. They killed and wounded lots of students, and one teacher. The attack on Columbine happened April 20, 1999, twenty three people were wounded during the attack (“We are Columbine” Fox News). Columbine is located at Littleton Colorado (“Columbine Shooting” History Channel).
As is the case with little Aiyana Stanley-Jones who was seven years old when she was sleeping on her couch and subsequently shot by Detroit police during a raid; as if a sleeping second grader could present any sort of danger to a grown man. The frenzied raid was warranted on the suspicion that a murderer was residing in the home. This is no problem, no one should be upset that the police are attempting to actually do their job and apprehend a possible killer. However, they didn’t just seize the man they later convicted with first degree murder, they themselves murdered a child. The events of what occurred were fuzzy at best, perhaps this was an accident, perhaps not.
“On May 3, 2001, she drew a bath in the middle of the day; she would later confess to police that she had planned to drown the children, but had decided against doing it then” (Andrea Yates Murderpedia). I believe she did not follow through with her plan on this day because she feared that either her husband or mother in law may interfere with her plan. On June 20, 2001, her husband left for work leaving Yates alone, despite the doctor’s orders to supervise her for twenty four hours. Dora Yates, Andrea’s mother in law planned on arriving to the Yates home to take over for Andrea an hour after Rusty left. Within that one hour, she drowned all of her children.
Partisanship and Misconceptions Introduction The saying “the pen is mightier than the sword” is widely known and referenced. However, contrary to popular belief, actions may speak louder than words. This rings true in the case of Michelle Carter, this specific case has been a reoccurring debate, in terms of whether Michelle Carter should be found guilty or not guilty for the death of her boyfriend, Conrad Roy III.
Rickwad – A person who alleges to be a religious Christian but upholds guidelines that point out under other circumstances. - The Washington Post Neologism Contest The Washington Post organizes an yearly contest in which newspaper readers are requested to give in optional definitions to existent words. The results are in many cases highly entertaining. Here are samples of Washington Post neologisms ("54 Great Examples of Modern-Day Neologisms," 2011): Frisbeetarianism (n.), the creed that when you pass away, your spirit travel through the air onto the exterior upper covering of a building and unable to move there.
Untreated mental illness is dangerous and over time we have learned that locking people with a mental illness is not the solution but makes it worse. People with untreated mental illness face many consequences. “People with untreated psychiatric illnesses comprise 250,000 people, of the total homeless population” (mentalillnesspolicy.org). The quality of life for these individuals is extremely heart breaking, and many are victimized regularly.
The opposing side of the argument may say Mary planned on the death of her husband though evidence says otherwise. When Mary went down to the freezer she “took hold of the first object she found” displaying how Mary didn’t deliberately grab a weapon to use on Patrick’s death and his actual killing was not clearly thought-out by Mary, proving diminished capacity and not murder. Mary Maloney deeply loved her husband and her child, through Patricks’ violence push her to her limits. No criminal intent was for sought when Mary’s state of mind obscurely went after Patrick. All in all Mary wasn’t in her right mind whyen all of this took place.
She told the girls if they did not go along with her plan she would kill
Anthropology Questions: 1. Was this crime indicative of the beliefs, morals, and culture of the two aggressors? 2. Were there any scratch marks found on the victim? Were there any fingernails found at the scene of the crime?