ipl-logo

Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission V. Whatcott: Case Study

1371 Words6 Pages

In Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott the courts were faced with several conflicting interests concerning the fundamental rights of free speech, a core value of our democratic society. The respondent was upset that the four flyers contained discriminatory messages directed at a protected group and filled a complaint stating that those flyers contravene with section 14(1)(b) of The Saskatchewan Human Rights Codes (Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott, 2013). The Appellant (The Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission) decided to appeal stating that section 14(1)(b) was a violation of section 2 of the Charter. The courts were then forced that ask themselves two questions, does section 14(1)(b) violate section 2 of the Charter and subsequently, if so, can section 1 of the Charter save section 14(1)(b). The subsequent paragraphs will discuss how the courts …show more content…

The fourth and final test requires the Judge to weight the negative effects of accepting the legislation and the positive outcomes that the legislation brings (R v Oakes, 1986). The Judge believed that the keeping the legislation in effects would outweigh the negative effects that is associated with it. So despite the fact that the legislation would be curtail an individual 's right to expression, something that has great value in a free and democratic society, the positive effects of the legislation would be protecting groups that are more susceptible to social discrimination. As well, by using section one of the Charter to save section 14(1)(b) of the code, we are preventing these protected groups from any harm to allow them to gain more equality with other groups (Saskatchewan v. Whatcott, 2013).
The main laws concerning this case is the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code, specifically section 14(1)(b). This section talks about how people can not publish certain materials such as materials that are seen to be as offensive and targeting a protected group (Saskatchewan v. Whatcott,

Show More
Related

  • Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms

    297 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is located in the first part of the Canadian Constitution and came into effect on April 17, 1982. The Charter is a document that outlines a set of constitutional principles that assist in creating a free and democratic country and is the most important of the laws in Canada. Some of the laws include: Fundamental freedoms (e.g. freedom of expression); democratic rights (e.g. the right to vote); mobility rights (e.g. the right to live wherever one choses in Canada); legal rights (e.g. the right to life and security); equality rights; language rights; minority-language educational rights and aboriginal and treaty rights. These laws guarantee the basic values of fairness, respect and tolerance for every

    Read More

  • Little Sisters Vs. Canadian Charter: Case Summary

    689 Words  | 3 Pages

    Officials had infringed upon the fundamental freedom in section 2 subsection 2(b), which concerns: the freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression. By confiscating specifically Little Sisters’ shipments of books and magazines, on the grounds of “obscenity”, Canada Customs halted and censored expression of gay and lesbian media. Additionally, Canada Customs was responsible for the infringement upon section 8 of The Charter, which pertains to the right of security against unreasonable search or seizure. Little Sisters’ shipments were repeatedly confiscated and detained, without just cause. Thirdly, Little Sisters’ right to equality under section 15 subsection 1 was violated because the discrimination they were subjected to was likely caused because of the fact that Little Sisters is run by and for the LGBT community.

    Read More

  • How Does Section 319 (2) Of The Criminal Code Prohibits Hate Propaganda

    549 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, subsection 319(2) of the criminal code violated subsection 2(b) of the Charter. Section 319(2) of the criminal code establishes a reasonable limit on freedom of expression under section 1 of the charter. The court found that section 319(2) of the Criminal Code did not violate freedom of expression as guaranteed by section 2(b) of the Charter. The crown appealed the court of appeals decision to the Supreme Court of Canada, in the case R v. Keegstra.

    Read More

  • Sauve V Canada Case Study

    434 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) (2002) Plaintiff - Richard Sauvé Defendant - Attorney General of Canada, Chief Electoral Officer of Canada & the Solicitor General of Canada FACTS The Plaintiff: Richard Sauvé is a former member of the biker gang ‘Satan’s Choice’. In 1975, Sauvé was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison for the murder of an opposing gang member. In 1993, Sauvé started a long journey fighting an injustice that denied all inmates the right to vote.

    Read More

  • How Did Pierre Trudeau Shaped Canada

    998 Words  | 4 Pages

    Pierre Elliott Trudeau is a significant person in the history of my theme, Canadian politics in relation to the legal system. As the 15th Prime Minister of Canada, he played a huge role in shaping Canada through his political career by upholding a philosophy of Canada united as one through a strong federal government. In the wake of the 1980 referendum win, Trudeau immediately wanted to fulfill the constitutional promise that he made during his campaign. It was he who had the vision of patriating the Constitution, and for the following 18 months this would become his top priority. Being the most reluctant to include an entrenched Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Constitution, he immediately formed a commission to get ideas from

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Section 33 Of The Charter Of Rights And Freedoms

    404 Words  | 2 Pages

    The section 33(notwithstanding clause) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is advantageous because it offers governments a just and reasonable tool to protect the rights of Canadians. Where notwithstanding clauses it allows people to continue to follow their identity and/or culture without the government’s restrictions. As section 33 allows the federal and provincial government to override some rules within the charter of rights. Section 33 has been used only a couple of times in Canadian history. Section 33 of the Chart of Rights and Freedoms is just and reasonable tool to protect the rights of Canadians because the government can exempt law for five years, protect or revive laws that violate specific charter provisions and lastly Firstly,

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Study: To Sikhs The Kirpan

    1654 Words  | 7 Pages

    For instance, the Supreme Court of Canada considered when to recognize a particular practice as a religious requirement. The decision then dealt with the appropriate method for accommodating religious practice in a multicultural society. The school board argued that it had to protect the safety of the rest of the students for the sake of infringing on one students rights. However, this court case provided importance, pointed to a minimum constitutional protection for freedom of religion that must be taken into account by the legislature and by administrative tribunals. In addition, safety concerns must be established for the infringement of a constitutional right to be justified.

    Read More

  • Kerrie's Rights Violations: Case Study

    194 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the violation that was clearly violated was Authority. Kerrie was given the assignment of reducing her operating costs by 15 percent. Most of the team was upset about the cost reduction goal especially since the year is almost over. They also didn’t know whether they could come together and make a decision as a team to reach the goal. Some of the members felt that they could go against whatever Kerrie’s decision was but wasn’t sure on how she would react.

    Read More

  • Aboriginal Court System Case Study

    672 Words  | 3 Pages

    1. Aboriginals peoples should have their own court system because there would be no bias or over generalized stereotyping to skew decisions or sentencing. Aboriginals are overrepresented in our Canadian Court System. Alcoholism and crime go hand in hand. Alcoholism in Aboriginals unfortunately is a common problem because of colonization and social upheaval.

    Read More

  • What Are The Factors That Have Helped The Canadian Legal System

    1141 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Charter is in place to ensure that the government doesn't take away or interfere with these rights and freedoms in an unjust way. It helps regulate the power of the government over citizens. In this case, the government violated the charter. The

    Read More

  • Civil Rights Injustice In Canada

    213 Words  | 1 Pages

    Viola’s case became headline of black newspapers and journalist across Nova Scotia and Halifax where many people were outraged by this audacious disregard for Canada’s constitution. King vs Desmond, arose civil rights injustice in Canada that has been “swept under the rug” now the government and the legislative bodies now had to address this issue of segregation and unwritten rules that some provinces still practise (Thomson, Colin A. 1986). Viola case went all the way to the supreme court event thought was turn down, this case left a massive impact on the citizens of Canada because blacks were now paying attention and united under one cause (Thomson, Colin A. (1986). They were no longer going to suffer the same injustice they did in the past,

    Read More

  • The Fifth Amendment

    1098 Words  | 5 Pages

    These articles and amendments work as the bridge that connects the structure of the present-day American Government. But at this present moment, the dream has been shattered with media coverage shown around the world of the equality aspect being destroyed. The police brutality against minorities and African Americans especially have contrasted with the structure built by the founding fathers. The controversial question is, the constitution written to protect all or just some who fit the so call American profile? Whiles, we look at the posed question we can look at one of the most protection driven amendments made.

    Read More

  • Essay On First Amendment In College Campus

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    This section is an extension of the privacy act. It states that you have the right to say what you may. However, it is the same way with the freedom of speech. You are allowed to express your opinion on multiple topics. You cannot say anything that is sensitive or may cause a rally or fight.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

    1204 Words  | 5 Pages

    The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

    Read More

  • Essay On Human Rights In Canada

    1042 Words  | 5 Pages

    “To deny people their human rights, is to challenge their very humanity.” -Nelson Mandela Canada is well known across the world for handling its national challenges well, yet has not been obeying the human rights. The human rights were made so everyone was equal and no one had higher power. According to Canada.ca, Canada is a founding member of the United Nation, (UN) and is a party to seven principal United Nations human rights conventions and covenants.

    Read More

More about Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission V. Whatcott: Case Study

Open Document