“Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind” (John F. Kennedy) JFK hints at how if mankind doesn’t get rid of the evil that is war, that evil will instead get rid of mankind. In this novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the author uses various themes and allegorical elements to show the underlying darkness and savageness that every man is capable of. In the book, a plane full of British kids crash and are left stranded on an island where they must survive, till they are rescued. As the story progresses, the schoolkids start to lose sight of their old morals and boundaries. Soon the boys start to all show the savagery that has been in them, leading the boys further and further away from their old lives and civilization. …show more content…
During a meeting in Chapter 5, the boys consider the question of the Beast. They argue over where the beast comes from, what it is, and what it can do. While all the boys are bickering, Simon grabs the conch and says, “”What I mean is… maybe it’s only us.” (Golding 126) Simon is proposing something that the others boys have never thought about, that perhaps the beast is only themselves. Although the boys laugh at his suggestion, this proves Golding’s point that innate human evil and savagery exists. Simon is furthering his thinking and sees the Beast as a component of human nature instead of an external force, revealing the evil that is throbbing inside the boys. Similarly in Chapter 8, Simon has a vision in the glade and is faced with the Lord of the Flies. The Lord of the Flies says to Simon, ““There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast… Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!... You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s a no go? Why things are what they are?”” (Golding 206) These words confirm Simon’s past speculation about the Beast being inside the boys, the Lord of the Flies identifies itself and acknowledges that it exists within all human beings “You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?”. Looking at the tone of the Lord of Flies, it is seen that the boys have also been using this …show more content…
Golding displays the conflict between civilization and savagery through the conflict between Ralph, the protagonist; and Jack, the antagonist. Golding shows the hidden evil through Simon’s encounter with the Lord of the Flies and how the Lord of the Flies states that it is impossible to escape him, saying that there will always be hidden evil inside everyone. Also Golding expresses the boys civilized manners and ascend to savagery through the boys being well mannered to being mannered in Roger “purposely” missing the rocks. Lastly, Golding shows that even the most civilized can not escape their inner evilness. Golding uses the book to display how every human being has an inner Beast, although some might see the book as being just about boys being stranded on an
The Lord of the Flies tells Simon they were going to have fun on the island and that Simon was not wanted. When he said have fun, he did not mean they would play around and have fun, but he was foreshadowing Simon's tragic death. In addition, Simon believes that the beast does not exist, but it is inside everyone, corrupting them from civilization, and leading them into
What would the output of a civilization be after it loses certain key aspect. Savagery. In the novel “Lord of the flies” by William golding certain pillars are needed to make and maintain a society such as Government, Jobs and religion. The novel “lord of the flies” A group of boys are stranded on a deserted island where they learn skills on how to survive like hunt, build and attempt to create their own civilization. Government is needed to create base for civilization to grow from.
The true nature of human instincts and evil actions lurk behind the social masks that society forces upon. In William Golding’s fictional novel Lord of the Flies, the author features the alteration of a group of young males who are isolated on a deserted island, projecting their regression from innocent children to killer savages. Golding conveys how effortlessly one's morality can be ripped apart when isolated from civilization which is shown through the savagery and remorse of the group of boys. In chapter 11, the young group of boys dispute on the idea of civilization or savageness being better. Ralph, who stands together with Piggy, fights for the goodness of mankind and believes in orderly conduct as opposed to unlawfulness and killing for fun.
In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, young boys get stranded on an island with no adults in the midst of a war. The boys were orderly and civilized in the beginning but then as they began killing pigs they slowly became savages and lost their civilization. The boys began turning on each other and the evil within them became present. Golding uses a variety of literary devices including personification, symbols, metaphors, and irony, to project the theme that pure and realistic people in the world can be unheard and destroyed by evil.
When Simon first encounters the Lord of the Flies, he realizes that it is a manifestation of the boys' fear and savagery. He thinks to himself, "Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill! You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you?" (Chapter 8).
I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are the way they are?” The Lord of the Flies says this to Simon in Chapter 8, during Simon’s vision in the forest. These words confirm Simon’s belief in Chapter 5 that perhaps the beast is only the boys themselves. This idea of the evil on the island being within the boys is central to the novel’s exploration of innate human savagery.
The boys start to take things out of hand and kill each other thinking that it is the right thing to do. One of the boys named Simon is a character from this novel that tries to stand up and tell everyone not to be afraid, much like FDR. Simon wants to relieve them of their fears of the “beastie”, which happens to be just one of the boys’ fears along with being scared of the dark or the unknown. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies can be analyzed using characters and symbolism in order to defend the theme of fear being a figment of one’s imagination when in times of trouble. There are many symbols in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies.
Then, in Document F, Simon again comes to question what the beast really is. It states that Simon hesitantly says that “maybe the beast is us”. Meaning him and the other boys living on the island. When reading down further in Document F, there is a chant. “Kill the beast!
The boys were pushed to this level of savagery by the need for power. In chapter nine of Lord of the Flies, William Golding employs symbolism, repetition, and animal imagery to convey the theme that the need for power can cause people to become savages. Golding uses the rhetorical strategy symbolism to convey the theme that the need for power can cause people to become savages. In this story they use a conch shell to symbolize order within the group.
The quote “‘Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!’ said the head.” (Golding 164) expresses that the Lord of the Flies is divulging to Simon that the evil is not something that can be hunted or killed but is within the boys. Simon also learns that the beast of evilness was in the boys all along. The theme Inherent Evil of Man is displayed through Simon learning that evil is within the boys and that this was the beast. This shows how the evil action appears as a beast and the understanding of evilness by
It has been said several times throughout history that human nature is constitutionally a negative force. This is further shown in William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies when numerous young boys aged twelve and under are stranded on an island after a plane crash during World War 2. These children abandon all civilization and grow more savage as the literature progresses. The main boys: Ralph, Simon, Piggy, and Jack change exponentially throughout the novel, gradually losing themselves and any culture they had. Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, depicts human nature’s inherent evil and man’s inability to escape it.
Although the other boys laugh off Simon’s suggestion, Simon’s words are central to Golding’s philosophy of anti-transcendentalism, that innate human darkness exists. Simon is the first character in the novel to see “mankind’s essential illness” which in turn, shows the beast not as an external force but as a component of human nature. Simons deep understanding of the beast is further expressed in his hallucination or his “discussion” with the lord of the flies that he has after one of his fainting spells, “There isn't anyone to help you. Only me. And I'm the Beast...
In Jake Wallis article, “Why Lord of the Flies speaks volumes about boys”(2014), argues that Lord of the Flies is not about human nature, it’s only about how boys act. He supports his claim by saying “it could be more accurately be said to be about the male human condition. ”Simons’s purpose is to tell the readers that the Lord of the Flies doesn’t talk about all human nature, it only talks about boys human nature. He creates a direct tone for everyone who reads the book.
During Simon’s encounter with the Lord of the Flies, Golding reveals the central issue concerning human nature. Simon reaches the realization that they fear the beast because it exists within each of them. The Lord of the Flies tells Simon that the beast is inside each boy and cannot be killed. The boys go from behaving like civilized young men to brutal savages. “What I mean is…maybe it’s only us.”
When the Lord of the Flies talked to Simon, Simon realized that there was no actual beast and that it was inside of them, "'You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close, close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are what they are'"