Many people dread having to walk through the lunch line and pick up a less-than mediocre meal from the scary looking lunch ladies. Personally, I have always liked the school lunches, until a recent experience put an unpleasant image in my head every time I take a bite out of a school lunch chicken sandwich. Government officials, and first lady, Michelle Obama, are trying to make school lunches more “nutritious” but it seems as though what’s really happening is schools are turning to cheaper food items instead of really trying to provide a healthy meal for growing high school students. Of course, there are healthy options, including fruit and vegetables, but the main courses are so processed that it disgusts me to even think about eating it. …show more content…
In the article, Harris goes into detail about a government proposal of banning various junk foods in school lunchrooms. Government administration, along with first lady Michelle Obama, are working towards an initiative of reducing childhood obesity, and they want to start by creating healthier food options, with more nutritious value. Harris then explains the other side of this topic. Many people are skeptical of this government plan. Giving government further control on school breakfast and lunch programs will shrink school board budgets. On top of this, Harris talks with many parents and club leaders, and they say this would be a major blow to the financial income of their school activities. Candy fundraisers are a common way to raise money for school related programs, and this new government ban may cause for these fundraisers to become non-existent. Harris acknowledges that banning all sweets from schools could be detrimental to the income of schools, but also suggests that many students are overweight and this plan may be able to reduce the growing number of obese
Ariana Cha combats a seriously pressing topic in her writing. While many articles are very quick to bash the school lunch program, while this article can enforce it. Cha is supporting the most common argument with the school lunch program, nutritional content. Cha is stating that the nutrients are offered, but are not being accepted by the students. The audience intended for this reading is, literally, anybody that disagrees with the provided meals.
Nicholas Confessore, the author of ”How School Lunch Became the Latest Political Battleground”, displays the challenges of transitioning from the old rules to the new rules as part of Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move!” campaign. It is clear to all parties that childhood obesity is rising at a dangerous rate in America and school lunches are believed to be the necessary first change. Unfortunately, the multiple different parties that are involved in making the changes do not see eye-to-eye. The School Nutrition Association is one of the groups pushing back against the new government policies. Since the SNA is comprised mostly of lunch ladies, they believe the current meals are the healthiest meal most students receive in a given day.
in spite of this, it is not effective enough to solve the problem of childhood obesity. On the surface, the restructuring of the NSLP seemed like a great idea. After all, who is against serving healthier food? However, concerns exist regarding if changes can happen in childhood hunger in the U.S. due to these new regulations from the HHFKA. The possible consequences are schools are faced with higher expenses due to these requirements, in response some schools have opted out of the NSL, so they do not need to follow the new rules (Turner & Chaloupka, 2014).
It will give students the ability to get rid of the risk of having an unhealthy lunch at school. Although it can make students lose weight, it won't help because those options are already there. Schools already have options like salads or fat free milk that are there for the student to choose. Changing the school lunches can also have an impact on what students eat at home by letting them adapt to the new foods. Changing the lunches will not let them adapt to the new food.
Imagine your school cafeteria plans to change to a new healthier school lunch menu, which would eliminate some of the students’ favorite cafeteria foods. Well my school has started a healthier lunches, and a lot of people is upset about it. I use to eat school lunches, but when they went to health food , it hasn’t been the same. The food looked bad and it was nasty. School that do have healthier lunches probably has more people pack their lunch instead of eating school food.
Lately parents of elementary students have been complaining about being hungry through the school day, or not being able to eat at lunch. Teachers are starting to realize a lack of concentration in their classes, and I’m pretty sure the teachers don’t like it. Each day there are tons of elementary students that are going to school full but leave school hungry. The reason for that is students are being forced to be hungry, because they can’t afford to pay, and schools will not give kids free lunches. All elementary students should be able to eat lunch for free to reduce hunger in schools.
On a typical school day, students sit through 7-8 hours of nonsensical busywork before they can even leave the building. Most high schools in America have a strictly structured day planned out for their students. To begin the day, students sit in class for a few hours. Then they are exposed to some of the worst food known to man, cafeteria food. Not to mention that once they are done scarfing down the sodium-rich garbage called food, the students have to sit in class for a few more hours before their freedom is regained.
First, if the school eliminates the foods students' like then some might stop buying lunches from the
These school lunches are something that almost every child in the United States experiences. With the regulations in place for school lunches, they may be considered healthy, but at many times they are not considered to be delicious. Many school lunches are being thrown away by students simply because they dislike what they are forced to put on their plate. The worst part of all of it all is that the students are well aware the lunches are good for them. In short: The guidelines of a healthy school lunch should be relaxed because many schools cannot afford it, more students no
“But her school lunch control regulations, which were passed in the name of healthy eating have been an utter failure” (Gonchar). The Healthy and Hunger- Free Kids Act was supposed to gives kids a better school lunch, yet it has failed. The ultimate result was that kids are not eating their lunches and money is being put to waste. “It’s great that schools are trying to make school lunches better, they’re not doing a very good job about it, starving kids at school isn’t exactly a way to get kid’s obesity down” (Arit John). Even though school are trying to make improvements the steps they are taking are actually worsening the situation.
Have you ever wondered if you could ever change the school lunches in the Public schools? Well you’re not the only one, many other people thought about changing the way you eat at lunch and started to change it. Some trials have failed but some have succeeded at the trail for their public school. But some administrators what it to come to all schools, for the fact that they are losing money because kids stopped eating lunches at school.
To begin with, the taste alone of school lunches is beyond unsatisfactory. The meals provided by public schools are not appetizing. There exists a tangible disconnect between the enticing, nutritious meals advertised on the school board’s menus and what the students actually receive—pathetic portions and lukewarm meals slapped onto a tray. Children’s complaints about school lunches are often seen as trite. However, while common, they are not any less accurate.
At first i was glad that changes were being made to the school lunch but then i saw the outcome . We got food that dogs wouldn't even eat . The food that is semi good is unhealthy and only a small portion is given. There was a survey taken in a high school with 1,300 students and only 22% said the food was actually healthy and out of that only 13% said
In 2010, with the help of the Let’s Move campaign, there was a change in school lunches which called for healthier, less sodium and fat filled food. This led to the backlash from both parents and children. However, what these people do not understand is that Obama is not trying to satisfy everyone’s specific taste buds, she is trying to give the children healthy and nutritious meals that can improve school performance and their health (Bracken). If our community legitimately believes that the junk food and unhealthy habits our generation partakes in has nothing to do with childhood obesity, then they are
Obesity is one of the things that america needs to work in there are 1 in 3 american kids that are obese i would like to stop that. By having healthier school lunches we can stop kids from being obese. If the kids don’t want to eat the healthy food they can either get it together or they can suffer from diabetes i am sure that kids do not want to suffer from