There is nothing wrong with protesting as long as it is kept peaceful and does not disturb the school or students inside of it. The Tinker vs. Des Moines Independent School is a case that is still reflected upon today. It is referred to in cases concerning freedom of speech. I think that when most people read about this case and look at all the fact and details they will see and agree that students of all ages should be allowed to exercise their rights at school. Schools can make decisions concerning what they want to happen and how they want people to act while on campus, but they can never decide that the people in their building are not entitled to their
The first reason public schools should not have uniforms is that regardless of what school conform proponents say, school uniforms will not prevent bullying or gang ties. Second, Students are being refrained of the ability to express themselves. Third, uniforms are teaching students conformity rather than individuality. Although school uniforms may have benefits, students will
With uniforms in hand, after school clothes won't be wasted, school uniforms will be only used in school. School uniforms are exactly that, a uniform, instead of a fashion statement. School Uniforms can even limit some of the pressures that keep students from wanting to attend school. Some students in daily life in school face peer pressure with the outfit their in, or what others are in. Peer pressure can occur because of clothing, students get so pressured about the issue and decide not to go to school.
Without integrity the honor system would fail due to the lack of honesty that is being set in place by having the students taking a pledge. With this being said students that take school seriously want pure focus and having the honor code it allows these principles to be put in place for better grades and higher rates of success. The author Chris Kahn in Source D uses a quote that shows the students use to commit to the honor code, “On my honor as a student, I have neither given nor received aid on this assignment/exam.” Kahn says that these students write the quote on every test that they turn in to provide a reminder that they are under the honor code. This is a strategy that is a strict form of the honor system letting the students to have complete trust in each other and to have the educators trust. That aside not every student will take a pledge and feel obligated to stop cheating or to be completely honesty.
I. SCHOOLS CAN LIMIT STUDENT EXPRESSION WHEN THEY CAN DEMONSTRATE SUBSTANTIAL DISRUPTION OR MATERIAL INTERFERENCE OF SCHOOL ACTIVITIES. Plaintiff 's article was adequately barred from publishing by Principal Ruiz because it demonstrated substantial disruption to the pedagogical values of Alpine High School. Despite the fact that the First Amendment applies to every person, regardless of age, race, or social status, the rights of students in the public schools "are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings." Bethel Sch.
On February twenty-fourth 1969, the Supreme Court made a decision in the landmark court case Tinker v. Des Moines. Within that specific case, students were punished for wearing armbands as an act of protest against the Vietnam War. The court ruled as follows “In wearing armbands, the petitioners were quiet and passive. They were not disruptive, and did not impinge upon the rights of others. In these circumstances, their conduct was within the protection of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth” (Legal Information Institute).
In the personal narrative, “A Student Asserts That Texting in Class Is Not Disruptive,” author Alex Howard argues that a complete ban of cellphones in the classroom environment should not exist. Howard argues that teachers and instructors are the main cause of disruption, rather than the culprit of texting. Howard brings up the fact that the instructors are the ones stopping class to call out the culprits, rather than the perceived notion that the student texting causes the stoppage in learning (58). He uses personal experiences as a high school student with these rules in place to support his main argument. Howard conducts testing of his hypothesis that teachers only care about the distraction caused by cell phones, and not distraction caused by other activities.
Good Morning everyone so again I am in front of you to deliver my Persuasive Speech which is “School should not required students to wear their uniform”. I choose this topic because I believe that most of the students want freedom to choose what they will wear. So my first argument, is it takes away the students freedom. So based on my research that I get from the internet by ”school-uniforms.procon.org/, The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees that all individuals have the right to express themselves freely. In the 1970 case Richards v. Thurston (3-0), which revolved around a boy refusing to have his hair cut shorter, the US First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that compelled conformity to conventional standards of appearance
Clothing of choice can be argued as a method of expressing personal identity as well as beliefs (Swafford 8). A student may like to wear a new outfit every other day, or wear more comfortable clothing. Evans believes that uniforms are not required to prevent wearing clothes that represent gangs, as there should already be rules that prevent this (Evans 3). Many parents corroborate this and believe school uniforms are not required to further students education, and that it can be done by placing basic rules on what can and can not be worn in school. While rules such as these are enforced in schools that lack a dress code, they can only do so much to prevent
For example, U.S court arrested Schenck accused of threatening the army which affected the national security through sending flyers to future army recruits motivating them to ignore their draft notices (Candela Open Courses, n.d.). prohibited any person who can violate It is helpful in the process of democracy because Americans beliefs and opinions are important to their national negotiation and maintains a responsible citizen. It has impacted the lives of the people in a way that an Americans can deliver any message in a way they wish. There is also freedom to worship as you want. Americans are allowed to believe in any religion, or not having any at all.