Wearing Uniforms in Public Schools
Heather Graham
Christopher Huntington
ENG122
January 3, 2016 WEARING UNIFORMS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
DeMitchell, T. A., & Fossey, R. (2015). The Challenges of Mandating School Uniforms in the Public Schools: Free Speech, Research, and Policy. Rowman & Littlefield.
The publication is a revealing piece that shades insight on the accrued impact of incorporating mandatory schools uniforms within the learning environment. It is a fact that children attending school come from diverse backgrounds; hence, the transformation process may limit the learning environment. Structural policies play a significant role in the transformation process, and personnel drafting the policies should bear consideration for the less fortunate
…show more content…
As a result, numerous schools both private and publicly funded have developed a desire to educate and cater for children raised in low-income families. The essay presents a fixed point on the policies that more schools should adapt to provide for the advantaged and unfortunate children, as more of the children raised from desolate families struggle to learn in typical school environment due to several factors. In pursuit of education quality, low-income families struggle to send children to schools that are expensive while the government can play a part by providing available amenities to ease the situation.
Preston, C., Goldring, E., Berends, M., & Cannata, M. (2012). School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 318-330.
The authors shade light on the aspect of equality by comparing public schools and charter schools. A common factor is that private schools tend to outdo public schools in academic matters. The script reflects on the importance of creating a conducive learning atmosphere within the school to facilitate the required academic environment. Innovation should be encouraged in public schools as chartered schools enact flexible parameters that are accommodating to most students enhancing the uniformity
Throughout history schools have served an important purpose; they aim to educate children and improve society by giving children the necessary skills needed to make advancements when they become old enough to make contributions. Although, schools are often criticized, by politicians, parents and in some cases the general population, for not serving their purpose properly. Often the people making these judgements are unaware of what is needed in schools. Society has been making judgements towards the education system for centuries and in some instances, it has been for the better. The thought behind the purpose of schooling hasn’t evolved as much as it has been broadened to include the vast majority of the population and along the way it has
By allowing parents to choose the best educational option for their children, tax credits and vouchers create a competitive environment that fosters innovation. Schools must continually adapt and improve in order to stay relevant, which scholars believe has the capacity to lead to new educational models, reaching new methods, and technological advancements.[11] With schools not only competing for students, but they are also competing against each other to provide the best educational resources and opportunities for the
The study portends that students are actually disadvantaged by attending a private school compared to a public school. The authors suggest that this may be due to public school’s innovation compared to private school’s antiquated teaching methods. The study highlights that private school students do not make the academic progress compared to their similar peers at a public school. This book confronts the reader with a researched vantage point showcasing that public school outperform private schools. Mitra, D. L. (2018).
It is well known that education in society today is a crucial component for achieving success in the modern world. Illustrating this importance is the fact that the United Sates has made K-12 schooling mandatory for all students and even provides this education free of charge to everyone via its public school system. However, despite the fact that the intentions for our public education system are good-natured, at least on the surface, some rather critical viewpoints have developed that put into question the true motivations surrounding this type of schooling. Most notably, John Taylor Gatto, a writer and former school teacher with just about 30 years of experience in the New York public school system, provides his take on the true purposes of our educational system. He argues that, based on his considerable experience in the field, this system fails miserably to succeed in its perceived — but not at all correct — goal of producing good people and citizens that are performing at their personal best.
America’s school system is lacking in what it can offer its students. The inequality in our society causes lower income families to be treated less than someone of higher class. Unfortunately, this difference in status means a difference in the education a child would receice. Even though there are programs, grants, and other sources of help for these children, why are there still children struggling to gain such a basic need? The educational structure is varied from state to state and country to country.
To begin with, students shouldn’t wear uniforms because it violates a student’s right for freedom. For example, quoting, “https://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/school-uniforms/” by Marian Wilde, “School uniforms violate a student’s right to freedom of expression...makes a target for bullies from other schools, are difficult to enforce in public schools, and are a financial burden for poor families.” This means that some families aren’t able to afford the school uniforms. Which, leads to many students getting bullied for not having uniforms like their
Envision waking up every morning to put on the same outfit and walk out the door, stress free. People would not have to worry about what fits, or what is fashionable at the time. Schools would not have to worry about inappropriate clothing but at the same time, that clothing may be a way for a student to express himself. Many schools view uniforms as a solution to several problems, but many schools view uniforms as a lack of self expression. School uniforms should continue, even though children may not get to express themselves, because they prohibit violence, provide cheaper lifestyles, and promote better education.
Over the last 20 years, many schools have shifted away from fairly unregulated student dress codes to more stringent dress codes, with some schools implementing voluntary or mandatory school uniforms. There are several positions on the dress code issue, each of which have their own persuasive arguments to support them, which can be evaluated to examine their validity. One position in favor of implementing dress codes is that these standards can improve student safety and perhaps even student performance at school. There are variations on this position that favor strict standards on what students can wear, while others want to implement school uniforms in public schools. The opposing view is that students should not be subject to any dress codes on the grounds that they restrict students' freedom of expression, and that they may place unfair cost burdens on poor families.
Public education is the largest expenditure of state and local governments in the United States, accounting for nearly one-fifth of all expenditures (Moser & Rubenstein 2002). The federal government has enacted many laws to try and bring about equality in educational funding dating back to 1960’s that include the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (Moser & Rubenstein 2002). Court cases have been brought before the supreme court in 19 states and all have invalidated their states funding for public school ( Moser & Rubenstein 2002). The supreme courts have rules that a child’s education should not be dependent on the wealth of their parent or the wealth of the
Many students that know uniforms will be beneficially, but don’t agree with school uniforms will continue to disagree with implementing them. It can be easily agreed that school uniforms may take away their self-expression in school, but what matters more in school is the way of learning. It can also be agreed that many students do not accept the self-expression of their classmates and make fun of them. Students, parents, and school administration should be able to recognize the benefits that school uniforms come with.
In the article of Dr. Alan Hilfer from 2009, “Disadvantages of a School Uniform Policy” stated that “We need free thinking children of to become thinkers of tomorrow, not droned who will continue making the mistakes of previous generations”(Hilfer, 2009). Feelings on school uniforms seem to differ as much as the reasons for having them, hate it, or love it. Recent studies done in the University of Alabama states that: “Student Uniform use was not significantly correlated with any of the school commitment variables. In addition, students wearing uniforms did not appear to have any significantly different academic performance” (Brunsma & Rockquemore, 1998). The problem whether schools should still be continuously implemented is a highly debatable topic.
As the economy has taken a turn for the worst, the education system has suffered right along with the economy. Costs nationwide have been cut for school systems putting a strain on education while the teachers struggle to meet the requirements such as “No Child Left Behind.” Parents and teachers are making such a big separation between private and public that children are beginning to realize the separation and are becoming segregated. Education is not a matter of public or private, grades, or even a future career choice, but education is a way of saving lives from ignorance. As education has changed, so to has the importance of gaining an education become even greater.
It has always been that the schools with more funding produce students that perform better. But even after an attempt to implement a standardized curriculum, the No Child Left Behind Policy and the Common Core Standards, there is still an obvious achievement gap between the schools with money and those without. In addition to the gap that still remains, there are new problems that arise as a result of planning a standard curriculum. One of the biggest complaints to be had is the issue of ‘teaching to the test’. Meaning that students aren’t learning what will be most useful to them in the long term, but rather what will prevent the school from losing government funding as a result of not meeting the test score requirement.
Bush (2003) stated in his education proposal that the quality of school directly affects students, teachers and parents. Yet there are a lot of children can be found with illiteracy, self-doubt and low expectations. Children who are illiteracy are left behind in a continuously developing world. School administration believes school should use latest technology to improve student academic performance (p. 2, 24). Although any child is not left behind (NCLB) Act of 2002 has emphasized the administrators to change the school curriculum into a standardized one.
For many decades, there have been thousands of arguments about whether university students should be made to wear uniforms or not. This is a combative and much-debated question that occurred amongst the University and others social circle. Example like at Pakistan, England, and the countries that all around the world. This question had been considering as the most debate question in around all the university. While in Malaysia, this problem also occurs in school systems for many years.