Scientific Method
I strongly agree with Poppers’ views of scientific method; firstly, deduction can provide certainty to scientific theory and allow us to accept hypothesis, law and theory as provisionally approved until it is falsified by the evidence; secondly, I believe imagination is the factor that infuses the development of science knowledge because curiosity is generally enhanced by imagination and personal perception. However, I think we should not ignore induction. In my view, induction together with deduction can be used to generate scientific knowledge.
From my opinion, Science is a set of knowledge that explains factors contributing to our functional universe; scientific theories build upon past knowledge and accumulate over period of time. Scientific method is the way in which science knowledge is achieved and justified. To justify scientific claims, solid evidence, namely experimental results and
…show more content…
As inductive reasoning is exclusively concluded from constructive evidence, potentially destructive evidence is somehow concealed, resulting in misinterpretation of information leading to ambiguous scientific theory. In response to Chalmers’ views of science, I believe induction and past knowledge allows us to establish testable and reasonable hypotheses but is insufficient to justify the result and ‘strictly having no imagination’ prevents us from pursuing undiscovered knowledge. As a result, induction is not as effective as hypothetico-deduction that allows us to openly question the universe and test our prediction by falsification to ensure that our proposed theory is the best explanation of the universe. I would frankly describe scientific method as follows: firstly, hypothesis is raised from past
Unit 1 Psychology Discussion: Pseudoscience
121 Words | 1 PagesThey should also consider how challenges are dealt with, Look at the research, and how science is believed and proven by the experiments, research and the actual progress that science has made. https://www.verywell.com/what-is-a-pseudoscience-2795470?utm_term=pseudoscience+examples&utm_content=p1-main-1-title&utm_medium=sem&utm_source=msn_s&utm_campaign=adid-276ea10e-583a-4cc8-af66-0d83d166a6c6-0-ab_mse_ocode-35484&ad=semD&an=msn_s&am=exact&q=pseudoscience+examples&o=35484&qsrc=999&l=sem&askid=276ea10e-583a-4cc8-af66-0d83d166a6c6-0-ab_mse
Great Influenza Persuasive Speech
492 Words | 2 PagesIn conclusion, the characteristics of the scientific method are far from few. Most distinctly, science deals with the uncertainty of the unknown, attempting to make it known. Though complicated, Barry explains his beliefs on the scientific method with strong diction to show the formality of science, rhetorical questions to show the uncertainty, and logos to show the intellect of science. His rhetorical strategies help the audience understand the plethora of characteristics in the realm of
Evan Kneezer's Theory
924 Words | 4 PagesThe demarcation criteria are the set of requirements that determine whether or not a theory is considered scientific. Just as the theory can only be accepted using the current employed methods, the theory must also comply with the current explication of the demarcation criteria, which is that the theory must explain the generally known facts of its domain and be fundamentally falsifiable. This latter is explained using the concept of confirmation and disconfirmation reasoning, which in both cases, bases its predictions on theories. With that, in confirmation reasoning, when the prediction is proven to be correct, the theory is thus correct. Disconfirmation reasoning is when the prediction turns out to be wrong, then that is evidence against that theory.
Popper's Induction Thesis
1257 Words | 6 Pages31) says Popper. He claims that with every discovery made, there is some illogical way it is come up with. This is known as the context of discovery; it is the idea that when scientists come up with theories, they do not do it in a deliberate way. Popper claims, "Indeed, if there were such a thing as a purely logical principle of induction, there would be no problem of induction" (Popper, Logic of Scientific Discovery, p. 28). People who question the validity of induction as a way to reason about our lives are justified in their thinking.
Scientific Revolution Dbq Essay
1137 Words | 5 PagesThis is called the scientific method and has been used not only in fields of science but also in politics and government. Document three is a model of the scientific method from 1999. The model consists of the 7 steps of this process. One: state the problem, two: collect information, three: form a hypothesis, four: experiment, five: record and analyze data, six: state a conclusion, seven: repeat the steps. The method was built using logic and reason to get from one step to the next.
Write A Rhetorical Analysis Of The Scientific Method By John Barry
581 Words | 3 PagesScientific research is methodical. Created from a desire to make the unknown known, the “scientific method” was created in the 15th century based on common sense. As Barry analysis the scientific process, he says that the unknown must be made into a tool, even against one’s own ideas and beliefs. However, that concept is tenuous, so Barry uses logical situations to present the idea.
Scientific Method Dbq
557 Words | 3 PagesThe term ‘scientific method’ means a way of discovering things whether it’d be a phenomena or trying to gain new knowledge. Furthermore a ‘scientific method’ can also be used to correct or adjust old knowledge to better support a theory with new ideas or knowledge. The use of the term ‘Scientific Method’ first came in to use during the 17th Century in between the years of 1850-1855. The general difference between science and pseudoscience is that science is based on theories which can be altered if they conflict with experiments and evidence and can be supported by experiments of scientific methods, however pseudoscience less evidence based and more based on belief and stories told by predecessors and claimed to be real but lack the evidence needed to support them. For example a difference between Darwin’s Theory and ‘Ancient Astronaut theory’ is that Darwin’s
Integral Review Essay
417 Words | 2 PagesEmpirical facts are understood in the light of a specific theory... And, theory is built from a careful consideration of the facts”. Science consist of theory and research, those two are what defines science. Neither one can exist without the other, they are also inseparable – existing in a generative yin-yang relationship (Wallis,
Inductivism Vs Falsification Theory
1172 Words | 5 PagesIn inductivism, a finite number of specific facts leads to a general conclusion. In falsificationism, definite claims about the world make a law or a theory falsifiable. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better, but not yet being falsified. For falsificationism scientific progress is possible via trial and error. While inductivism is applied to mathematics for instance where generalization is more possible, falsificationism is really common in biology, physics or social sciences, where there is not a general pattern, but many exceptions to the laws or theories.
Popper's Falsification Theory
1925 Words | 8 PagesThus, Popper believed that scientist should be critical and they should be able to test their views with empirical evidence and rational discussion. However, he rejected positivism especially logical positivism and questioned the principles of ‘inductivism’ and ‘verificationism’. Popper rejected classical inductivist views on the scientific method and was in favor of empirical falsification which he is well known for. Furthermore, as David Hume had already showed that experience cannot be verified, Popper believes that only falsification can be used for empirical process of
Scientific Method: Scenarios
1001 Words | 5 PagesScientific method: Scenario 1 Scenario assigned by instructor: _ an unexpected road block/detour while driving to work, school, etc Often, application of scientific methods gives persons an opportunity to conclude about causes of their problems in an expedient manner. However, to successfully solve a problem, an individual has to start by identifying the problem at hand which is then followed by evaluation of solutions using scientific methods. A scientific method works best when an in this scenario begins by asking myself why is there an unexpected roadblock on this route?
Nomothetic Induction Approach
1356 Words | 6 PagesDespite the fact that it always involves taking a leap, there is a way of justifying it. German scientific philosopher Hans Reichenbach is an advocate of the pragmatic justification of induction. Reichenbach clearly depicts: “Either nature is uniform or she is not” (Anwer 252). Professor Mc Allister, who is also in favor of this method of justification explains that we can not be sure the world contains any universal regularities, however if the world does contain regularities, then induction is at least as quick as any other cognitive strategy at identifying these regularities. Inductivism is going to be the quickest at recognizing this.
Lucretius Divine Power Analysis
950 Words | 4 PagesWe live in an age where scientific breakthroughs are made daily. Unfortunately, society takes our success for granted. People do not comprehend precisely how far we have come and, more importantly, how we have done so. The desire to learn and explain observations sparked the scientific revolution a few thousand years ago. Like all newly garnered information, base knowledge first needs establishment to expand understanding.
Summary Of Thomas Kuhn's Criticism Of Scientific Realism
745 Words | 3 PagesThe primary aim of science, according to scientific realism, is objective truth, as opposed to mere empirical success. One of
Differences Between Science And Pseudoscience
1410 Words | 6 PagesA number of basic standards for determining a body of knowledge, methodology, or practice are widely agreed upon by scientists. One of the basic notion is that all experimental results should be reproducible, and able to be verified by other individuals.[13] This standard aim to ensure experiments can be measurably reproduced under the same conditions, allowing further investigation to characterize whether a hypothesis or theory related to given phenomena is valid and reliable. Philosopher Karl Popper (?) in one of his project attempted to draw the line between science and pseudo-science.
More about Scientific Method
Unit 1 Psychology Discussion: Pseudoscience
121 Words | 1 PagesGreat Influenza Persuasive Speech
492 Words | 2 PagesEvan Kneezer's Theory
924 Words | 4 PagesPopper's Induction Thesis
1257 Words | 6 PagesScientific Revolution Dbq Essay
1137 Words | 5 PagesWrite A Rhetorical Analysis Of The Scientific Method By John Barry
581 Words | 3 PagesScientific Method Dbq
557 Words | 3 PagesIntegral Review Essay
417 Words | 2 PagesInductivism Vs Falsification Theory
1172 Words | 5 PagesPopper's Falsification Theory
1925 Words | 8 PagesScientific Method: Scenarios
1001 Words | 5 PagesNomothetic Induction Approach
1356 Words | 6 PagesLucretius Divine Power Analysis
950 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Thomas Kuhn's Criticism Of Scientific Realism
745 Words | 3 PagesDifferences Between Science And Pseudoscience
1410 Words | 6 Pages