AP Language: REHUGO Argument Project - Loeghan Cook
Thesis
Technology has become an essential tool in our lives, however, technology has taken away our ability to be physically sociable with one another.
Reading
Essay 1- Shea, Renee H. LANGUAGE OF COMPOSITION: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric. Second ed., Bedford BKS St Martin's, 2018. Facebook Friendonomics by Scott Brown
Scott Brown, a writing critique, in his essay “Facebook Friendonomics” implies that social media, such as Facebook, has changed the definition of friendships. He refers how friendships online are distant and lacks the value of a physical friendship. His purpose is to show how Facebook makes friendships expandable and weakens real-life connections. He uses diction to negative connotation to convince his audience that online friends lack the personal growth compare to proper friendship. Brown’s argument effectively motivates people to put aside their devices, met face-to-face, and fulfill the values of a proper friendship.
I
Essay 2- Shea, Renee H. LANGUAGE OF
…show more content…
When four students were denied service, near Greensboro, based on their race. The four students made a protest outside the restaurant. When people spread the word, without the use of social media, people slowly begun to join alongside the students. He refers to another protest against the communist government in Iran, although, the message was spread through social network and received lesser support. Gladwell’s purpose is to establish the difference of activism between a group coming together by social media and a group physically uniting. He shows his audience that personal assemblies are more effective than through social media because there is a stronger connection, whereas networks lack full
In the article "More Facebook Friends, Fewer Real Ones, Says Cornell Study" by ABC News, the author explains that now a days people have more friends on social media than real ones, that's a problem. In the text it says "We may "friend" more people on Facebook, but we have fewer real friends"(Paragraph 1). This means that people have more friends on Facebook then in real life and that people are spending all of their time on their phone with their "friends" instead of hanging out with their real ones. Also in the text it says "Forty-eight percent of participants listed one close friend when asked, 18 percent listed two and 29 percent listed more. A little more than 4 percent didn’t list anyone."
Michelle Saldana Ms. Van Dervort English 2 HP - P.2 10/29/15 Need for Change Imagine a society where tablets sell as toys and voices sound similar to the clicks of typing keys. In this society, young children play with electronic gadgets instead of marbles and dolls. Adults communicate by texting their conversations rather than physically speaking. As the humans emerge into technology, they grant their full control to electronic devices. As an outcome, humans no longer have interest with one another, however, they now only have an interest with themselves.
To further convince the reader, Ludden uses a study referenced in a journal by the credible Duke University psychologist, Jenna Clark. The study addresses college students and how the more Facebook friends that freshman had, the less socially adjusted they felt, whereas with seniors, the more Facebook friends they had, the more socially adjusted they felt (Ludden). This was due to a majority of the freshmans' friends being friends from high school or back home, whereas most of the seniors' friends were friends that they had made in college, therefore they were more connected with them because they interacted with them both online and in person. This study makes it easier to understand how the effect that social media has on you fully depends on your use of it. It makes sense that one would feel isolated and less connected to their environment when they are spending their free time connecting with those who aren’t around them.
In the sixties activism was handled through personal sit ins and throwing yourself into the direct line of fire of controversy, now activism has become you show if you support or disagree by a push of a button. The new wave of technology has been said to benefit the world, giving us tools that will improve our methods of activism, but to Gladwell that is not the case. To him, and many others, social activism has in a sense become the easy way out or low risk meaning you show support but not enough to actual make a difference. Social networking has created weak ties that allow the population to come together and discuss effortlessly. Where as back in the sixties the NAACP needed to create strong personal contacts in order to make even a splash in the civil rights movement.
Gladwell’s most memorable quote, “[a]ctivism that challenged the status quo-- that attacks deeply rooted problems-- is not for the faint of heart (Gladwell 311).” Through this, Gladwell is trying to get across to the readers his definition of activism is not merely sending letters, using hashtags on twitter, or sending emails to the specific nations head of state to address a specific issue; true activism is not protesting with signs with words just simply written on them. To Gladwell, he considers true activism to be people who risk their lives, people who put their lives on the line to show clearly to the public the hidden, deep-rooted problem; something that catches someone’s eye and is rebellious in nature. True activism is going against normal societal standards, as Gladwell puts it, “activism that challenge[s] the status quo”; it is to do something rationally unexpected, something that will tick people off enough so others will know about it, not through social media but through people, like the good ol’ days. Gladwell’s definition of true activists know when they protest, they have a chance of becoming injured, or even killed.
In Malcolm Gladwell’s essay, “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted”, he compares the structures of social activism with how personally invested or connected a person is in the movement as well as the risks. Gladwell concludes believing the internet, or mainly social media is an ineffective tool for creating social and political change. He focuses on activism during the civil rights movement, mainly, the Greensboro sit-ins. For modern society, Gladwell focuses on activism in the “so-called Twitter Revolution” (171). It was the first of February, 1960, at four-thirty when four African American college students sat down at the lunch counter at the Woolworth’s in downtown Greensboro, North Carolina, which did not serve blacks
He talks about how social media is tied around weak ties, and how Twitter and Facebook is a good way to have many friends or stay in touch with people you usually wouldn’t. But he says that if can be a wonderful thing. “There is strength in weak ties, as the sociologist Mark Granovetter has observed. Our acquaintances--not our friends-- are our greatest source of new ideas and information” (407). Here he is trying to show the good in having loads of internet friends, but explain of that can be a bad thing.
I believe that he states a good and clear position when he explains that social media cannot provide discipline and strategy as a campaign would or a boycott which requires and depend on strategic and persistent; because they have a leader and not a network. Although, social media cannot be control by a single authority, but it creates larger network, which can help people when it comes to communication but it doesn’t always work even if there is a leading strategy. As Gladwell said internet and social media is resilient and adaptable. such as the Freedom Project of 1964; four years after the sit in, of Greensboro.
In “Small Change”, Malcolm Gladwell explains how activism is affected by social media. Gladwell looks negatively upon new “tools” of social media for activism, in particular social activism. She thinks this form of activism is weak and perhaps not even activism. She defends activism as unions of people who have a personal relationship and fight against a conflict that involves them all. An example of this in the text is the Civil Rights movement, where African
In fact, people are still able to bond using technology, it can help people to keep in touch, and it can be used to help people cherish what is important to them. As long as humans do not abuse it, electronics can simply be used as a new way to interact with one another. Unlike the outcomes of “The Veldt” and “The Pedestrian”, technology does not have to consume or ruin lives. People should encourage one another to use the modern items at their disposal without uninformed cynics claiming that they are living life
By the end of that month over thousands participated in sit-ins across the American south, many people were arrested, but even more people joined in on the cause. Gladwell states, “These events in the early sixties became a civil-rights war that engulfed the South for the rest of the decade—and it happened without e-mail, texting, Facebook, or Twitter”(Why the revolution will not be tweeted). According to Gladwell, some people claim to suggest that we are living in a time of revolution due to the tools of social media. People are now able to collaborate a lot easier, and thus people are now able to speak out against
In her document “ The Fakebook Generation,” later to be published in the New York Times on October 6, 2007, Alice Mathias enters the topic of the most used social networking service worldwide, Facebook. Mathias debates on Facebook’s claim of being a forum for “genuine personal and professional connections” and tries to influence her readers to ask themselves if the website really promotes human relationships. The author illustrates in her document the power and impact Facebook had on the population by convincing to be “a place of human connectivity,” but states her idea of Facebook missing its real reason of enriching human connectivity. Mathias goes on how Facebook became more as an “online community theater” than a functional service tool. She provided examples like people who announce relationships with Chinese food in their status in order to make others laugh instead of providing useful updates.
Information and communication technology has seen lot of changes and advancements since the year 2000, key among them being the development of social media as a social influencer. It has become prominent parts of life for many young people today. We are all aware that social media has had a tremendous impact on our culture, in business, on the world-at-large and social media websites are some of the most popular haunts on the internet. Most people engage with social media without stopping to think what the effects are on our lives, whether positive or negative. Are we as society becoming more concerned with Facebook “friends” than we are with the people we interact with face-to-face in our daily lives?
Nowadays, technology devices become plays an important role in our daily lives, especially in adolescents’ categories. While there is a very clear argument for how the technology is effected on us and causing social isolation as we know, but in another way is also the argument that these technologies are helping us to become more social in our society. This is very probably because we have a good and perfect ability to communicate with each other. Despite long distances. We all know that the goal of technology is to make our lives easier and more efficient.
As a kid in the early 2000, I wake up very early in the morning to watch my favorite cartoon show Pokémon. After I watch the show, I am off to play outside with my friends until dark because the internet at that time wasn’t so easily accessible nor did any social media exist. I never imagine that by 2014, people’s desire to use social media is the reason for home internet subscription and a phone plan with data. Although I do feel like social is great for online communication, I don’t see it as being a necessity and people don’t have to be on social media so often like an obsession. I think that life will be alright without social media for a day or more. I think that online communications lessen the quality of friendship and increase the number of friends that people have online.