I. INTRODUCTION
Freedom has been associated with numerous concepts such as liberty, rights, and life. Likewise, it has also become an important and salient concept in the social sciences as well as philosophical if not ethical debate among human actions and relations. In addition, this idea encompassed the moral, political and social doctrines for the holistic development of man. Scott Hughes (2007), delineated freedom in three interrelated but fundamental concepts such as self-control, political equality, and legal right. Further, freedom as a self-control also means self-ownership, a political empowerment, and equal empowerment, thus it is the equal distribution of rights in the free society. Henceforward, an individual’s rights are also
…show more content…
History, as chronologically presented by scholars were series of conflicts and forces which included human movements that were innate to human beings as a political and social animal. Hence, he came up with the issues of obedience and coercion. Accordingly, he believed that to coerce was to deprive people of their freedom which excluded people from happiness and goodness. He left questions as to what extent a person should be able to perform things without interference and second, what or who can control to determine someone to …show more content…
Existentialism finds the answer to the absurdities present in the world including issues about human freedom.
Dudley (ND) averred that Kant’s idea of freedom is inclusive than the libertarian thought. Further, Kant illuminated that choices are determined by autonomous will and are not subject to restrictions. Likewise, there is freedom of the will and that will is subject to the condition of genuine freedom of choice.
Kant wrote the Metaphysics of Ethics (1797) where he described his ethical system that is based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. Moreover, human actions of any kind undertaken by the person is a result of the sense of duty dictated by reason. Kant also divided reason into two parts; hypothetical imperative which dictates that human actions were performed for a certain end, and the other is categorical imperative which is the basis of morality: “Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will a general natural law.” Thus, freedom is not a lawless freedom of anarchy but rather of self-government, the freedom to obey with consciousness on the universal laws manifested through reason. The end of every freedom is to ensure the welfare of each individual in which reason dictates toward an ideal
The writers of the Declaration of Independence demonstrate that all men are equally created and are provided with [God-given] rights that cannot be taken away, and those include, the rights to, “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”. In the preamble, the Declaration of Independence indicates, “… men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights… Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” (“The Declaration of Independence”). John Lock, the philosopher who strongly influenced that segment of the Declaration of Independence argues, how life is, in fact, an inalienable right because God owns us, in other words, we do not own ourselves (James). In society, the unalienable rights can be seen as how we have the right to do anything we want in our lives, but there are rules that are established so that we can remain safe and therefore, they should be followed. The unalienable rights present in the Declaration of Independence are just one of many examples that express democratic ideas important to American
Kant’s notion of freedom connects to morality, which displays contrast between duty and inclination, explaining how only the motive of duty, doing the right thing for the right reason, confers moral worth of an action. Kant believes that everything in nature, including humans, “works in accordance with laws,” that all actions must be appointed by law, The formula of universal law that basically states how you should treat humanity as an end rather than as a means. He says we should only act upon the maxim, a principle that gives a reason for action, without contradiction. Davis claims that law is not always reliable when insuring justice; moreover, Kant can support
Societies’ common sense becomes higher than people’s nature, so they start to understand that for the bright future they need the authority, because the freedom is very quick and unstable moment and the source of freedom is authority. Surely, at the beginning concept of freedom is very tempting, you feel free to do everything you want. Freedom gives you opportunities to live in a way you want. However, humans’ egoism and selfishness disturb others’ freedom, because they think freedom is something that will solve their life problems and reduce responsibility from them. These circumstances make humankind incapable of using their freedom and create chaos.
Zach’s Reflection Freedom is something we often take for granted and do not realize how much it can impact our life. But how did we earn that freedom and how do we keep that freedom that we so often enjoy without thinking about it? It is because of the brave men and women who are willing to sacrifice everything including their lives to defend our rights and Country. How do these brave men and women get treated after serving our Country is an important issue, which is where originations like the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), Disabled American Veterans (DAV), and Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) come in to help.
Two Concepts of Liberty Summary of the essay: In this essay, the famous political theorist Isaiah Berlin tries to differentiate between the notions of positive liberty and negative liberty. Berlin briefly discusses the meaning of the word ‘freedom’. He says that a person is said to free when no man or body of men interferes with his activity. He makes reference to many philosophers in the essay, but there is more emphasis on the thoughts of J. S. Mill and Rousseau, the former being a firm advocate of negative liberty while the latter believes strongly in the ideals of positive liberty.
Today, life can be unfair for those people who seek to be free from people who have big power over them. According to Naomi Wolf the author of “Freedom is Intended as a Challenge,” people can get the freedom they want, if they will learn how to extend happiness. In her article she takes Thomas Jefferson declaration and identifies three main points that make many people believe that freedom is
True freedom is commonly defined as absolute choice; whether it is in thought, actions or speech, freedom is an individual’s ability to take control of their lives and enables the human experience. Civilization views freedom as an ideal, yet the means of achieving it and whether or not freedom is truly achieved remains ambiguous. There are often individuals in civilized society who struggle and believe themselves to be free after a hard earned victory against oppression. Yet, the implications of maintaining a civilized social structure upon freedom is often overlooked. Many individuals view themselves as free from a subjective standpoint, although true freedom has an absolute meaning.
Freedom can mean protection from the government or freedom could mean doing whatever you please. What it does not mean is to be forced to choose between leaving their country and family or being sent to war, or choosing between two negative alternatives. In the piece What is Freedom, written by J.M. Jellison and J.H. Harvey, it is exemplified how a social study on Americans show the different reactions towards situations is addressed to one’s freedom. Individuals will feel freer when choosing between positive alternatives rather than negative alternatives. For example, if one was to receive a bill of $40 with a note stating there will be a fine of $4 if they do not pay within 30 days, they are more likely to feel “trapped, with no desirable alternative” (pg 48).
The concept of liberty influences that God and/or nature gave every human vital rights and ever human should be able to act free of dictatorial restriction. The philosophers of the Enlightenment highlighted that government had zero power over a human’s morals. They also highlighted that every man had rights, and were made equal. They stated political influence is established by
Freedom is the right to do what you want, is right to live where you want, is right to choose the religion that you want and freedom is right to eat, learn, drink what you want. There is one thing that limits our freedom: someone else’s freedom. According to a Boğaziçi University student Arda Seyhan, “We can live free by respecting other people’s freedom. We are living in a community which we all need people around us, we can not just ignore other’s freedom and do what we want to do for our freedom.” We should consider other people's rights.
Liberty as defined by Thomas Hobbes means the ability to act as one’s wish without outer physical dominance or interference but then true liberty doesn’t exist in real state as we have to abide by some laws in society to live in peace with others. Here, Isiah Berlin argues about the existence of two concepts of liberty: - Negative and positive liberty. He then tries to differentiate between the two concepts but then the idea of positive liberty he defines has been further illustrated more by other modern philosophers. Thus, the idea of positive liberty seems partially problematic with the reasons he has provided in the essay but then his argument is further questioned as both the concepts seem to overlap sometime and positive liberty is something
In 1787, our founding father’s agreed to write a list of principals for keeping people free. Freedom must be limited. People can not just say they are free. You can not just kill or violate just for freedom. There should be respect for people’s wants and needs.
The extent to which the law should reflect a moral vision even when this involves an interference with the rights of individuals who might disagree with that vision has been debated for centuries by lawyers, philosophers and theorists. This issue has been contested in particular by legal positivists and naturalists as well as liberal and conservative commentators. The extent to which the law should reflect a moral vision is also impacted by culture, as Western and Eastern cultures have very different perspectives on the matters of law and morality. In reality, there is no definite answer to this moral dilemma, however one can explore the different views and attitudes of commentators, philosophers and indeed societies of different cultures to
Layers Within Freedom Freedom is such a relative term that it is immensely difficult to ascribe it to any single thing. For one, it can be freedom of movement, for another it can be freedom to be truthful to oneself. Discrepancies in freedom extends to how it is found or achieved as well. Certain individuals may be more strong-minded, thus adjusting the difficulty or process in which one obtains their “desired” freedom. Others may not, and the journey to finding freedom can sometimes lead to an undesirable and unpredictable end.
Is the freedom we individually experience existent or is it a delusion? On a day-to-day basis we make choices, whether big or small, we have the power to choose. Nevertheless, you are not required