To answer question two, to compare and contrast immigration prior and during the late 19th would be that both were for personal well being. Those that settled in America, say the pilgrims, came here for religious freedom more or less. They sought for this new land to bring them new opportunities for a better life. The main difference between these waves of immigration has to be this notion of the “American Dream”. Though this new wave of immigrants did come seeking a better and new life, there was something a little different that separated them from the pilgrims.
In Scott Russel’s response to an essay by Salam Rushdie, Russel makes an effort to show his audience that Rushdie’s thoughts and ideas on migration are not the entire population’s stance by referencing to the united states of America. By using devices and history, Russel is able to support his argument through the United State’s past, as well as using certain words and phrases to evoke emotion in the reader. Scott Russel relies on alluding to the past of America’s land to support his writing. For example, Russel alludes to the nation’s first heroes, using a comparison between them and the stripes that make up the flag. By setting this foundation of our nation’s morals and those who make them up, Russel has set the stage to continue his essay.
The first paragraph explains America 's motives describes them as explorers and conquerors, this of course differs from Rushdie’s cultural values of migration and bettering ones life instead of ones nationalistic expectations (35-40). Sander’s on the other hand shows distaste with this ideology as he says it brings harsh effects as a result of bringing visions and values along with migrants as they travel (44-52). Migration values clashed due to the fact that from Sanders perspective, migrants try and bring outside influences in, whilst Rushdie’s idea of migrants focuses more on what migrants can bring to America as a country of explorers and
Thomas Paine is effective in explaining his reasoning for wanting to be an independent nation and telling loyalist why it's better to leave. Paine takes down the British loyalist argument by taking apart each part of their reasons for wanting to stay British. Each time Paine states one of his arguments when he starts his paragraphs he states the loyalists reasoning for backing the English. As the paragraph goes on he dismantles their arguments and gives his reasonings as to why he doesn't agree with loyalists. He will start paragraphs off with statements such as;”We have boasted the protection of Great Britain, without considering, that her motive was INTEREST not ATTACHMENT”, and “But Britain is the parent country, say some.
One must turn to the origin of the history of a place before it was submitted under colonized authority. Author Richard Gray of Journal of Inter-American Studies states that Martí’s, “belief in law caused him to say that constitutional government was best, but only if it were authentic. He called for patriotism, but not narrow nationalism.” Martí deeply believed in the freedom and the ability for a country to rise above and govern themselves with no help. He urges people to bring back indigenous cultures rather than misplacing them, similar to a buried and distant
Our nation say we are here to help people. We say we are here to give people a chance to be free. We say we that we will help our neighbor. Many might think like Will when it comes to not have immigrants in the county. One can see what he is saying.
American view is optimistic, they think personal freedom is a core value as it suggests that the society as a whole will work better if you count on the individuals to live up to their best selves. Comparatively, in some culture would view human nature more pessimistically. In this case, they tend to be control people strictly and monitor closely to avoid negative impulses. Taking care of oneself is also an important value of American. In American culture, parents will not interfere children’s decision of choosing their own major and it is common that a young woman move out, a young man gets a job and does not give money to their family.
Since the beginning of time, families have had a member or friend that has lived cities maybe even states away, but mobility should not be the reason for them to lose that relationship.Perry Patetic in his article, “Fast-Moving Society” argues that mobility is the reason why families and friends lose good relationships. The author supports his argument by first demonstrating how mobility makes is easier to move away from people and places in the past. He continues by saying traveling long distance is the only way grandparents and grandchildren can spend time together nowadays. The author’s purpose is to convince everyone that mobility is the big issues and it keeps progressing in order so that others will realize this and stop using it to move away. The author establishes a bitter tone for mobility.
Due to more reasons why it persuades the colonists to give away their peace and freedom. “Show your faith by your works, that God may bless you”. (Paine 110). Shows a separation between faith and peace take place to show sympathy towards the parents to be involved in what to bring peace home to their children. Even the parents want to see their children live the good life with the values and qualities of peace and freedom.
In 1968 the immigrants sought better economical privileges and a better life, they were mostly people from the Commonwealth, an organization assembled of mostly former British territories. Whereas the immigrants nowadays mostly come from North Africa and the Middle Eastand they hope to not only have a better life but also to escape war or political issues. . If Enoch Powell were to pronounce his speech at the present time, his claims could still be relevant today, even though they are presently, by many, considered as racial prejudice. They are still applicable, since we now face mass immigration with similar problems but amplified compared to the immigration situation in 1968.
Taiaiake Alfred discussed targeting the new generations who are impressionable and open to change to gain power by spiritually accepting the warrior path, the spirit of wasáse, to ultimately combat colonial attitudes. The hierarchical structure of society and the feelings of living in a third world nation can be reversed by embodying “the spirit of the ancestors who went to war against the invaders [in a] compelling and honourable [manner]”. To effectively find true peace Native Americans have to become self-sustaining from any governmental aid, including food, land to live on, and other survival necessities. Alfred notes, “We still depend on others to feed us and teach us how to look, feel, live. We still turn to white men for the answers to our problems; worse yet, we have started to trust them.
The best ways for people from other countries to adjust to living in the US.People move to different countries because of the bad environment’s they was in. A quote that John F. Kennedy stated was , “Efforts and courage are not enough without purpose and direction .This specific quote is describing you will go through things while adjusting to a new life to a new country and picked the United States for a reason. Here are two ways people are immigrants and adjust to a new life. One way people want to immigrant to a new country or place will be by making a better life decision.People move with a good cause. The people believe moving to the US they can afford more things that they can purchase and wouldn’t be necessary.Another way can be by
We need to quit outsourcing our jobs, keep them at home. Build business back at home. Give incentive to companies and businesses that keep the products and business here in the U.S. we should make the U.S first again. We should bring back the design. The equipment and the knowledge on how to build something back in the U.S. We need to make sure that companies and businesses know and fypiermce that it’s profitable to keep business here in the U.S but the most important is stop spending what we don’t have and learn how to live within our means, that includes the government.
Some of my sources counterclaim that America is a melting pot and thus to be Americanized one needs to give up any factor that would affect national unity and cultural cohesiveness. In order for America to thrive as a nation, the dominant culture has to conquer the minority and thus allowing the minority culture to assimilate within theirs. This argument is bogus since regardless of America being a melting pot or a salad bowl, the retaining of smaller cultures are important to people who value their cultural roots and ethnic identity. It is clear that America cannot be accounted as a melting pot, thus national unity and cultural cohesiveness is a process that can never be developed. The concept of a black skin, with a white mask is something
1. The essay’s thesis is, “that we can have an immigration policy that both strengthens our borders and welcomes immigrants.”. In my own words I would restate it as, “Our country should have a better system with letting immigrants with good intensions into our country, and the treats outside of our country, while never discriminating any immigrants.”. 2. One argument Schwarzenegger used as evidence is when he talks about having a stronger border, especially after the 9/11 events.