This study proved that given the amount of time that adolescents are on computers unsupervised whether it be at home or in public libraries those who cyberbully are most often the ones that were prior victims to cyberbullying themselves. This study would benefit in research for “affects cyberbullying has on adolescents because it gives reasons to why cyberbullying bully in the first place. Although with was full of useful information it would have been more beneficial to monitor social media sites that the kids were using verses how long the kids were on the internet. In doing so, it would have supported their theory of cyberbullies being vicitam of bullying as
Pros and cons of social media “Internet addiction even worries Silicon Valley”, a Guardian-article by Tracy McVeigh, describes how psychologists and technicians alike are worried about side-effects of the extended internet usage in our day. Internet use disorder has become a recognized illness with specialized treatment centers. In the article, Tony Dokopil, a Newsweek writer, is quoted saying that evidence of the internet having a negative effect on mental health is piling up. A part of the problem is that compa-nies require employees to stay within reach at all time, which is extremely stress-ful. A congress about finding the difficult balance is to take place with attendance of giants like Facebook and Google.
An article published by BBC News UK states that almost one out of five children have at some point experienced to be bullied online. These dangers are only som of many dangers youths may have to deal with in the world because of the technology. Despite of the dangers to brows the internet, the web can also be a great source for information and pleasure, but it is important to know the risks as well. Just because there are some dangerous things about the web. It dont mean you should stop using it.
Even though his data might be misleading because he is basing most of his article after static as well, I believe that his import on this story is a necessity because not only does he work with kids; he’s also a parent as well. The problem Parikh Rahul identifying, is the overreaction of teen’s danger online. He states that parents are too caught up with the danger of the internet; they drive themselves insane, trying to protect their kids. He wants parents to know, most kids don’t spend their time on the internet, talking to Stanger, sending nude picture, or sexing. Some kids join
Some people prefer that social media have some good effects for children, while others believe that social media only can harm children. In the ultimate analysis. Actually, on balance analysis, I agree that social media causes bad effects for teenager because social media take up a lot of time for children to study, and have a bad influence on the development of their body and mind health. Parents wonder if their children’s constant use of Instagram, Facebook or Snapchat is healthy. Teenagers talk about the pressure to post the perfect photo or to compete with the perfect lives their friends present on the Internet.
Technology intoxicates the brains of young children and young adults, is what most parents might say when asked about the effect that technology has on the younger generations. In the article, “The Digital Parent Trap” by Eliana Dockterman, she appeals to logos, appeals to ethos, and compares the effects of technology to persuade her audience that early exposure to technology actually can be beneficial. First, Dockterman appeals to logos throughout the passage when arguing her point. In her passage, Dockterman continuously uses statistics as evidence to support her argument. For instance, Dockterman mentions than in an SRI study, the kids playing puzzle games on a device scored 12% more than the kids who did not play the games (paragraph 8).
Snapchat is an app that features different filters for users to take photos with and they’re able to send it to their friends. Social networking is not good for middle school students because students have lower grades, it facilitates cyberbullying, and it spreads unreliable and false information. First of all, social networking is not good for middle school students because some students get distracted by it and as a result, get lower grades. A study has shown that 500 teachers took a poll and they believe that students spend more and more time on social networking. One said “Children are becoming obsessed with social media.” Furthermore, a study by professor Paul Kirschner said students try to multitask between their phone and homework and
When considering the choice of whether video games are good for you, the choice should definitely be yes. Although video games can have many damaging effects, like poorer grades in school, this is dependent on how many hours students spend on video games each day. If you spend a healthy amount of time playing video games, and also spend some time doing something else, then they can have a beneficial effect on you. If my claim is not listened to, many parents and teacher will still believe that video games are only doing harm to kids and students, but they can also do a number of good as well. Many parents and adults believe that video games are a waste of time, but if you look at games other than first person shooter games such as Call of Duty and Counter Strike: Global Offensive, you can find some that are very challenging and make the player keep trying until they get it right, require the player to use their wits, and force them to cooperate with their team.
Access of children to the internet Introduction Access of children to the internet has become a widely debated topic. Issues such as the age children are allowed access, to young people being conned into thinking someone they are talking to online is their own age. Some websites that offer free videos and games are actually grooming sites for many paedophile 's. Children, often as young as three are allowed unsupervised access to the internet with no parental control. Although the internet is a very popular and powerful tool, extreme care by parents must be exercised when allowing their children to go online.
According to a UCLA psychology study, children who use technology are losing the straightforward skill of analyzing human emotions (Wolpert). Kids who acquire online friendships, instead of talking face to face with friends, are damaging their social development. Worse yet, some schools are even replacing human interaction with media (Shields). A journal entry written by Gwenn O’Keeffe and Kathleen Clarke-Pearson reviewed an in depth analysis that proved children who devote exorbitant time on their devices have an increase in feelings of loneliness and a decrease in social involvement (O’Keeffe and Clarke-Pearson 801,802). In a broadcast about the impact of media on children and adolescents, video games were said to be causing violence and aggressive behavior in children.
Carr also comments that the internet makes people more shallow –thus the title of his well-known book. This is because the internet takes away from attentive thinking. The internet constantly bombards its viewers with a lot of varying information and because of this the viewer is forced to multitask and loses focus of any original, contemplative thoughts. This multitasking effect is a key element to the very design and business model of the internet, as Carr suggests in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The faster a computer user can read and click, in other words the more the user can multitask, the more he/she gets to see, and the “more opportunities Google and other companies gain to collect information about us and to feed us advertisements.” Thus, in the end, internet multitasking negatively affects users but positively benefits the inventors and marketers. William Badke expounds upon this very idea in his article “How Stupid Is Google Making Us?” According