Secondly, the composition of the Seanad is an important factor in its effectiveness in the legislative process. The Seanad is the Upper House of the Oireachtas. Article 18 of the Constitution sets out the composition of the Seanad. There are sixty members, eleven of which are selected by the Taoiseach. University graduates choose six members. The leftover forty-three are elected in Seanad panel elections. There is a restriction on who can vote in these elections; those being, members of the Dáil, members of the outgoing Seanad or members of county and city councils. This election takes place after the Dáil has been dissolved. Therefore, the new Dáil will have been formed before the elections start. There are five panels that are formed and each panel has two sub-panels. One of these is the Oireachtas sub-panel. Members of the Dáil and outgoing members of the Seanad nominate candidates for this sub-panel. Therefore, this composition shows that the Dáil has the privilege to vote in a majority of the members of the Seanad, giving them an additional power. The role of the Seanad in the legislative process …show more content…
Due to the minimalistic role of the Seanad in the legislative process, its effectiveness is also lacking in strength. In 2013, there was a referendum held to abolish the Seanad. This proposal was rejected in the referendum. Reasons for the abolition were that it would save money and that the voting method was undemocratic. The fact that these reasons were so simple shows that the removal of the Seanad was not a serious or drastic event that could have taken place. It was not seen as a serious issue by the Government. Under Article 18, the Dáil elects forty-three out of sixty members of the Seanad. This could mean that the lower house has the majority support from upper house. These points, in turn, present the idea that the Seanad’s effectiveness and importance, as a House of the Oireachtas is
Rayshaun first became involved in the justice system at age 13. His legal history includes three intake contacts. Rayshaun has had an intake contact for a felony offense. One or more of the intake contacts were for felony offenses against another person. He has no failure to appear or history of escapes.
Freelance writer and professor Ed Cray presents a thorough recount of Chief Justice Earl Warren’s political and personal life in Chief Justice: A Biography of Earl Warren. Warren first enters the scene as a district attorney and later, the attorney general of California. The second chapter, then, focuses on Warren’s role as the 30th governor of California and the 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee. Finally, the final chapters emphasize his role as a Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, and chair of the Warren Commission. Warren’s involvement in the political scene warrants this comprehensive 700-page biography.
For the Constitution, the specific section to address the structure and composition for the legislature is in Article 1. Article 1 of the Constitution gives Congress its powers and limits. Congress acts as the legislative branch of the government, meaning they would be the ones upholding the power to make laws for the United States. The amendments to address the structure and composition for the legislature are the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments. The 13th amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary service/servitude.
Title: The Political and Constitutional Implications of re Senate Reform, 2014 SCC 32: Word Count: 1500 Referencing: MLA Date: October 19, 2015 Introduction: In re Senate Reform the primary issue that was present was whether it is possible for the government to make amendments in regards to the Senate function (para 1). Six questions were sent to the Supreme Court to consider, which are: (1) Whether it is in the power of the legislature to change the time limits set out in the Constitution Act 1867?
What does the judicial system do for those of us who aren't immediate victims? Why do we as a society need the court system? Is it only for black and white justice, or have we placed more importance then that on the righteousness of the gavel? In the modern United States there is a belief that the courts not only judge guilt, but at the highest level, act as a national conscience and affecting society before society realizes it should be changing... But is this the case?
Per the United States Constitution Article One Section Seven, “Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States.” (archives.gov) When a law idea is proposed, it MUST go to Congress, which is comprised of two chambers, House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representative consists of 435 members, the Senate has 100 members, and they both have committees and subcommittees that works with specific matters, for example the Education and the Workforce Committee and the Higher Education and Workforce Training subcommittee. ("The Legislative Branch"; edworkforce.house.gov) Currently, the Senate has 20 committees, with 68 subcommittees, and the House has 23 committees, with 104 subcommittees; there are four joint committees.
Devolution of the legislature into a full-time body was accompanied by a major expansion of it support staff. Those in the Illusional he concentrate on pending legislation and research where as staffers in the legislators home district offices spend much of their time on constituents problems. Legislature spend much of their time and committees. He cites the standing committees staffers assist more than 60 select committees that address Nero issues and nine joint committees to coordinate to house party efforts. Defenders of the system counter that this staffing arrangement help compensate for a week party organizations and then for missing gaps associated with rapid legislative
Revising the US Senate... The US Senate is the least representative legislative and worst branch of a government body in the democratic world. An ever shrinking minority of voters has the power to obstruct policies favored by the majority of the American people. From the 18th century to the present, the ratio of large- to small-state populations has grown from 19-to-1 to 66-to-1.
I believe that reforming the Senate is the best way to go. The "Triple E" Senate plan aims to develop an elected, equal and effective Senate. We will be able to provide a more balanced regional representation by electing senators. Additionally, if the Senate is abolished, there will be no final revision or discussion of any legislation. We will be relying on the House of Commons to make all of the final decisions.
It is in the chairmanship of these committees and their subcommittees, that most of the power of Congress is located. A typical Congress has, in each house, about two dozen committees and well over a hundred subcommittees. There are three kinds of committees: standing committees—more or less permanent bodies with specific legislative responsibilities; select committees—groups appointed for a limited purpose, which do not introduce legislation and which exist only a few years; and joint committees—on which both representatives and senators serve. Each member of the House usually serves on two standing committees, but members of the Appropriations, Rules, or Ways and Means committees are limited to one committee (WDB
The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.
In the book, Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson covers many aspects of the legal system, including Stevenson’s quest to create fairness for convicted children. Through Stevenson’s experiences, he sees, first hand, children who are sent to adult prisons. Specifically he saw how the prisoners who were convicted as children revert to a diminishing mental state and often have a great deal of trouble readjusting if they are even remotely capable of doing so. One experience that Bryan Stevenson encountered was with a young fourteen year old named Charlie whose case illustrated the impacts of an adult world in a child’s head. Unlike Charlie, children should never be pushed into adult prisons or receive adult punishments because of their lack of clear understanding
The legislative branch The most important job of the legislative branch is to make laws . Also the legislative branch
Parliamentarism, or a parliamentary government, is defined “as a system of government in which the executive, the government, is chosen by and is responsible to…the legislature.” (Gerring, Thacker and Moreno, 2005, p. 15) With this form of governmental control, many advantages and disadvantages arise, especially when this system is compared to the likes of ‘Presidential systems’ or even that of ‘Semi-presidential systems’. However, my aim within this essay is to, both, highlight to advantages of parliamentarism, and to also give my opinion as to why this system is better when compared and contrasted with the aforementioned systems. According to Hague and Harrop (2007, p. 336), there are three different branches relating to the parliamentary system. Firstly, the legislature and the executive are “originally linked”.