Teens enjoy their freedom, and not all teens are stereotypically “wild” or “out of hand” on the road. I believe this because first of all, if the driving age were to be raised, it would limits teens’ options for the future and or present. Next, it gives teens more independence, and teaches them about responsibility. Lastly teens can transport themselves and get where they need to be. The cons to raising the driving age outweigh the pros.
Too many people disregard the risks they are taking when they choose not to wear a seatbelt in a car. Statistically, teens have the lowest seat belt use of any age group, but this also results in teens having the highest death rate in a car crash. According to the CDC on “Motor Vehicle Safety”, “55% of the teens who died in a car accident in 2012 were not wearing a seatbelt” (CDC, Motor Vehicle Safety). Most of these deaths also occurred in states that only have secondary enforcement laws, in which an officer can’t pull someone over for not wearing a seatbelt, but if they are pulled over for something else, they can be ticketed for not wearing their seatbelt on a
Driving isn’t a matter of age; it’s a matter of maturity and education. Despite the popular belief, age has nothing to do with the large amount of teenage driving fatalities. It’s due to a lack of experience. Instead of a blanket measure like raising the driving age, there are other steps that could be taken to make the
Drunk driving is a serious problem that continues to take thousands of deaths each year. Too many innocent lives been lost to drunk driving. A death from drunk driving does not only affect the victim but it affects everyone around them such as family and friends. One night, one drink, one mistake is all it takes for drunk driving to take its toll. There are many solutions to prevent drunk driving, but they will only work if we put them into play.
Those who use hand-held devices while driving are more engaged to their cellphone then they are to the road. By becoming more engaged, a driver can get to his or her destination faster by making sure not to miss an exit or turn. Those who are on their phones and not paying attention to the road, have a higher chance to miss an exit or turn. But with the use of this law, drivers can and will be more engaged then ever before. Banning the use of hand-held devices allows drivers to become more
Over the last twenty-two years, there have been more than 130,000 fatal teen crashes. Though these teenagers are legal, trained drivers, what is a solution to reduce the number of lives lost due to these lethal car crashes? Scientists believe that the solution to reducing the amount of deaths would be to raise the driving age and enforce stricter driving laws. Parents, however, are against raising the driving age as they would have to drive their teenager to the movies for a longer period of time. Thus, the driving age should be raised to twenty due to the maturity of people’s brains and understanding of consequences rather than depending on emotions and desires.
NBC News San Diego reported that the study found drivers who had a BAC level of 0.01 percent were 46 percent more likely to cause accidents than the sober drivers they collided with. Therefore, people’s risk of causing serious crashes increases as their BAC levels rise. Seeking legal guidance Californians who are involved in drunk driving accidents may suffer serious injuries, which require extensive medical treatment. This may lead to unexpected medical expenses and, in some cases, may impact their ability to work and provide for their families. Therefore, people who have experienced these types of situations may benefit from working with an attorney.
“Road crashes are the leading cause of death among young people ages 15-29, and the second leading cause of death worldwide among young people ages 5-14” (Asirt, 2016). Rising the age on driving is important, because the age play an important role in driving. Many people consider that driving at young age will have more accidents. Also, drivers should have high skills in driving, and how they can avoid accidents in many cases. Some teenagers get excited about driving, and they get the license quickly without performing.
As gun violence has been plaguing the United States of America for a number of decades, causing mass shootings and unwanted deaths, it is not surprised that more than 100 million handguns are owned in America for protection (Kates & Mauser, 2007). To prevent the future generation from being a victim to gun violence, some suggests that they should be allowed to carry firearms on campus for self-defence. This essay is against the opinion of permitting students from carrying weapons to school regardless the advantages it might bring. This is because teenagers have yet to fully reach maturity, teenagers armed are seen as a threat to others and lack of training in handling firearms. One of the reasons to prevent students from carrying guns is the fear of misusing firearms.
Those under the age of eighteen do not have the legal rights given to adults; since we do not treat them as adults, it does not make sense to sentence them as such. Biological studies also have found that teenagers make impetuous decisions and cause trouble because their underdeveloped brains lack the ability to look at future repercussions for their actions. Moreover, teenagers are still at an age that they are easily influenced by their environment.They succumb to peer pressure which can push them into doing crimes by the virtue of wanting to be accepted. Furthermore, they should be placed into the juvenile justice system, a safe environment in which allows young criminals to learn from the mistakes they make, rather than into adult jails, a place in which harden criminals could physically and mentally harm them. To sum up, the United States justice system should not try adolescents as adults because there are many neurological and external factors that differentiate them from adults; moreover, it is a must that we reform the United States juvenile justice system in order to help these