should lead to enhanced second language attainment and usage. Clearly, language objectives are fundamental to second language evaluation and are the focus of our attention. Teachers must be able to distinguish among these objectives so that they understand how each can or cannot be used in planning more effective classroom assessment and evaluation in educational system.
STRATEGIES FOR CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION
Informal assessments/authentic allow teachers to track the ongoing progress of their students regularly and often. While standardized tests measure students at a particular point in the year, ongoing assessments provide continual snapshots of where students are throughout the academic year. By using informal assessments,
…show more content…
Preparing for evaluation should be an integral part of planning each lesson or unit as well as general planning at the beginning of the school year or course. Instruction and evaluation should be considered together in order to ensure that instruction provides itself to evaluation and that the results of evaluation can direct ongoing instructional planning. Moreover, if evaluation is not planned along with instruction, the time required for assessment activities will most likely not be available. As pointed earlier, clearly an important focus of classroom assessment and evaluation is student achievement. Teachers need to know what and how much students have learned in order to monitor the effectiveness of instruction, to plan ongoing instruction, and for accountability …show more content…
Feedback and evaluation are inseparably related to both instructional objectives and classroom learning activities and are indispensable elements in the learning process. Classroom assessment and evaluation is like a feedback. Loop-assessment activities are motivated and shaped by instructional purposes, plans and practices in the classroom and decisions that arise from the results of these activities in turn lead to reshaping of these instructional purposes, plans and practices. Effective classroom assessment and evaluation requires an understanding of the role of evaluation in planning and delivering instruction. It calls for the collection and interpretation of a wide range of information, familiarity with a variety of different methods of assessment and for competence in using these methods creatively, careful and systematic record keeping and judgment. Finally, an effective classroom assessment and evaluation calls on teachers to become agents of change in their classrooms actively using the results of assessment to modify and improve the learning environments they
My evaluation of two months employment at TPS/Eugene Elementary was not based on my professional criterion. Instead, it was judged by parents of a group of students who did not want to do their class work and follow class rules. They went to the office making up a bunch of stories about me. I was not informed until my evaluation. I did not know what was going on.
A variation of assessment methods, where appropriate and practical, can therefore successfully
The effort needs to focus on every child and their needs. In his work as an education guru, Robert Marzano offers guidance that could lead us toward curriculum and instruction that celebrate student learning and achievement, but more importantly, growth. Formal assessments are good if they reflect points in the students journey, not as a one and done grade (Marzano, 2013). Formal assessments for students should only represent points on a performance scale. Marzano noted that "characteristics of sound feedback" include that it should be frequent, give students a clear picture of their progress and how they might improve, and provide encouragement.
When review and creating the curriculum for each room the teams of teachers will use the assessments given as a tool to make each classroom developmentally
Standardized testing is becoming a concern for many. There are many pro and cons associated with standardized testing and students. In our present education system, standardized testing is view as a way to find out the progress the student has or is academically. However, this may not always be the case. Standardized testing is actually putting a lot of pressure on students, families, teacher, and the school system.
Assessments are a teacher’s tool that builds a profile on student’s growth and are the “tell-tell” detectors that provide the with teacher information on a student who may need additional services in and beyond the
The article “Effective Classroom- Management & Positive Teaching,” written by Katharina Sieberer-Nagler gives insight to elementary school educators about how to be more informed and experienced in their field by providing creative methods to deal with struggles new educators may not have a grasp of yet.
2:1 Compare the strengths and limitations of assessments of a range of assessment methods with reference to the needs of individual learners. Workplace Observations, question and answer/professional discussions, projects/assignments, portfolios, witness statements. A good assessor will always take into account their learners needs and what particular subject they are studying for prior to confirming with learner type of assessment method to be used. Workplace observations
Teachers use formative assessments which can be formal and informal within learning to review the child’s induvial needs and to be able to adapt their teaching techniques when planning lessons or activities to meet the needs of induvial children to improve within their learning and develop. Teachers in each year group would then assess this information with subject leaders to make sure they record and maintain induvial progress. The assessments can be used to give feedback to the children or young people, so they can understand and develop on their work and to give parents or carers feedback on their child’s learning and the level they are working at. formal/informal assessments are carried out by the teachers using assessment strategies such
I incorporate this learned experience daily and learn through each success and discovered area of improvement. Addressing my students needs using a variety of assessment tools has been a beneficial practice to help guide instruction. Students have different learning styles and their strengths and weaknesses are not always apparent using the same methods of assessment. Utilizing formative, standards(goal)-based, anecdotal, observational and benchmarks has driven my instructional programs. The combination of different assessments provides me with a multi-dynamic perspective of my students allowing me to better understand their strengths, weakness and academic needs.
Assessment and Suggestions When
Superintendents noted that one major concern of the evaluation system is that subjectivity in an evaluation system cannot be removed. Some principals are more specific in their evaluations when rating a teacher’s lesson where others are more lenient (Derrington, 2014). Teacher evaluation systems became the main focus of legislation and education when the lack of growth was recognized in student test scores across the nation. The study focused on the validity of the teacher evaluation system in Virginia. Three hundred and thirty-eight teachers from 16 at-risk schools participated in a pilot evaluation system during the 2011-2012 academic year.
1. Give the name of the teacher, grade level, school and dated visited in your answers to these questions. Describe the assessments the teacher used to evaluate the effectiveness of his/her instruction? What assessments are used during a lesson and what assessments are used at the conclusion?
A rating scale was developed by using the learning outcomes as the criteria for judging student performance on a numerical scale. Gronlund (1973) argued that some objectives required higher levels of achievement to master than others. This was reflected in the descriptors of the particular skill to be evaluated. The numerical scale 4, 3, 2, and 1, reflected excellent, good, fair, and poor respectively. In development of this rubric, assessment was scored out of 12, diagnosis and planning were scored out of 16, implementation scored out of 28, and evaluation scored out of 8.