ipl-logo

Section 10 Of The Constitution: Innate Dignity

212 Words1 Page

The Constitution
Section 10 of the Constitution asserts the innate dignity of and guarantees that this dignity will be both safeguarded and valued.
Section 16(1) of the Constitution bestows of all the entitlement of freedom of expression. The Constitution, established on the values of human dignity, equality and freedom, omits specific expressions from constitutional protection because of prospective assault on the dignity of others. Section 16(2)(c) of the Constitution, the hate speech provision, withholds constitutional protection for expressions which propagate abhorrence on racial grounds that provokes injury. An expression both promote animosity and encourage injury to constitute hate speech. Importantly, the Constitution allows all expression, rather denying protection to the expressions assigned to section 16(2) of the Constitution. …show more content…

Hate speech is proscribed to circumvent the public order disintegrating into anarchy because of revenge sought by victims thereof, to stop mental and emotional injury to victimized groups which would impede their competence in partaking in community life, to avoid and marginalization of minority factions repudiating similar prospects and advantages and their imperceptible disregard as equal citizens and preclude socio-politico breakdown. Parliament may promulgate statues proscribing expressions exempt from constitutional

Show More
Related

  • James Keegstra Case Analysis

    1148 Words  | 5 Pages

    The suppression of hate propaganda signifies an infringement of individual’s freedom of expression. An activity that conveys a message through non-violent forms of expression is protected under the s.2 of the Charter regardless of how offensive it is. Moreover, there was a misapplication of Charter, which made s.319 (2) of the Criminal Code to fail the proportionality test. There was no relation between the criminalization of hate speech and its suppression. Although his comments were offensive, they did not pose any threats they way violence or violence threats would have.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of The Mathew Sheppard And James Byrd Act

    576 Words  | 3 Pages

    This act was established by the federal law within the US and passed in October 2009 by the Congress (Altschiller, 2015). It protects individuals from hate crimes that may be directed to them by other individuals. As a result of their differences in gender, ethnicity, and origin. This act gives the justice system of the US the authority to punish those who engage in hate crimes that are motivated by their victim’s race, religion and ethnicity among others. Moreover, for a victim the hate crime to be protected by this act, he or she does not

    Read More

  • First Amendment Rights: The Westboro Baptist Church

    355 Words  | 2 Pages

    First Amendment rights are guaranteed to all American citizens, but current free speech issues are testing Constitutional boundaries. Where must the line be drawn between free speech and infringement upon others’ rights? Is there some speech so cruel and so appalling that it does not merit protection? These issues have been raised by the recent activities of the Westboro Baptist Church. Based out of Topeka, Kansas[1], this small group of radicals is marked by their hateful views and their contempt for homosexuality. The Westboro Baptist Church has gained notoriety and sparked national outrage with their offensive acts, particularly by protesting the funerals of fallen soldiers.

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass's Role In Social Media

    885 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hate speech is defined as: speech that attacks, threatens, or insults a person or group on the basis of national origin, ethnicity, color, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability. While the United States has the bill of rights and the freedom of expression/speech some states do have speech provisions such as California. There are laws that label speech as ‘limited classes’ which could cause one to be sued in a court of law and that would include: lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or “fighting” words – those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. All other speech is protected under your first amendment rights. Refer to a legal expert when in

    Read More

  • Essay On First Amendment In College Campus

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    This section is an extension of the privacy act. It states that you have the right to say what you may. However, it is the same way with the freedom of speech. You are allowed to express your opinion on multiple topics. You cannot say anything that is sensitive or may cause a rally or fight.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

    1204 Words  | 5 Pages

    The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

    Read More

  • First Amendment To The US Constitution

    398 Words  | 2 Pages

    The First amendment to the US Constitution is known as the bill of rights. The bill of rights is a broad generalization of the freedoms guaranteed to US citizens, these rights include; freedom of speech, freedom or religion, right to bear arms and many more. The Texas Constitution also list outs these rights, except go into much more detail (Maxwell, Crain, & Jones, 2014). For example, in the US constitution, it states that we have the freedom to practice any religion we choose.

    Read More

  • First Amendment Bill Of Rights

    155 Words  | 1 Pages

    The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right of “freedom of speech” Bill of Rights, n.d., p. 1). It was designed to guarantee a free exchange of ideas, even if the ideas are unpopular. One of the most controversial free speech issues involves hate speech. Hate speech is a public expression of discrimination against a vulnerable group, based on “race, ethnicity, religion,” and sexual orientation (Karman, 2016, p. 3940). Under the First Amendment there is no exception to hate speech; although, hateful ideas are protected just as other ideas.

    Read More

  • First Amendment The Most Important Essay

    601 Words  | 3 Pages

    People say things that others don’t agree with, or they say things that are disrespectful,but that doesn’t mean there’s a law against it, because everyone has a write to speech. ‘’Or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. ’’ What this is trying to say is that you can say anything to anyone you want even if their powerful. But you can get in trouble if you say something threatening.

    Read More

  • Charles Lawrence Racist Speech Summary

    770 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hate speech against minority is discrimination which has no place in our society. Constitution is color blind. Skin color does not make any difference; it is racism which lies in the eyes of beholder. Hate speech suppress the voice of minority so that they are unable to exchange the ideas

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Should Hate Be A Crime By James B. Jacobs

    565 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this article, Jacobs successfully makes his argument by remaining objective, appealing more toward the ethos and logos of the reader, and limiting emotional language. Jacobs aims his article toward lawmakers and voters. Motives are subjective and based on many factors; therefore, Jacobs argues that basing hate crime off of motive does not only create hardships but also flaws. He continues his argument by looking at rights given to the people from the First Amendment. According to the First Amendment, people possess many freedoms including the freedom of speech; however, Jacobs argues how hate crimes

    Read More

  • Summary Of Chapter 5 And Six Pertain To The Rights Of The American People

    948 Words  | 4 Pages

    This concept is also true with the symbolic speech clause and commercial speech clause. The government will protect the right to speech to advertisements and the citizens to a certain degree. Slander, libel, Defamation of character, hate speeches, and actual malice will not be tolerated. These include degrading someone as a person, their race, or religion. As soon as the public’s safety is a risk, the Clear and Present Test takes effect.

    Read More

  • Racist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    The First Amendment aims to protect the right of freedom of religion and the right of freedom of expression of all United States citizens. However, Lawrence states “The Supreme Court has held that words that ‘by their very utterance inflict injury or intend to incite an immediate breach of the peace’ are not constitutionally protected.” (Lawrence, pg 175) The First Amendment does not protect speech that maintains a sole purpose to inflict harm on other people. “Racial insults are undeserving for First Amendment protection because the perpetrator’s intention is not to discover truth or initiate dialogue, but to injure the victim” (Lawrence, pg 175)

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    The ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate

    Read More

  • Hate Speech: The Freedom Of Speech

    1318 Words  | 6 Pages

    The time in which we live is the age of communication and the speech or talking one of the important ways of communication and expression. There are different types of Speech and communicate, one of them hate speech. Hate speech means attacking a person or group based on different basis such as gander, religion, race, ethnic origin or nationality and disability. In the other hand, some of human rights treaties agree with freedom of speech or freedom of expression it could offend or disturb others so government of Countries placed laws of hate speech to avoid harms, troubles and problems. Over years Hate speech law became one of the most known laws in international law.

    Read More

More about Section 10 Of The Constitution: Innate Dignity

Open Document