SECURITY CAMERAS AFFECT OUR LIFESTYLE
The security cameras are destroying our lifestyles due to our privacy is being invaded by the cameras without our agreement, it isn’t a good idea to record the people, whether in the world exist more innocent people than criminals. I firmly believe that the people don’t need security cameras in public places because the cameras mustn’t record every movement that we do. They don’t help to reduce the crimes, in others words, the security cameras cause unemployment and laziness in the policemen and they don’t do their work well. Record people is morally wrong and unethical; moreover, the security cameras make a space of fear and worry, we can feel hounded; also, the people need privacy and liberty. The governments
…show more content…
Moreover, they want to have the control the people. Everybody needs privacy is something inherent and necessary our personal space, it essential the privacy in our lives and the security cameras are causing serious problems to our lifestyle because analytics think that the people are safe, but it is uncomfortable and annoying that the cameras are always watching us without our concern; for instance we open a window of our house and then, we know that we are being recorded, so we are going to feel worry and hounded for the invasion to our privacy, another reason is the security cameras could hack and our information in going to be used; the cameras are not safe. Furthermore, the governments have to look for quiet of the population and give security with more policemen in the street, instead of the surveillance that only change our lifestyle.Therefore, the security cameras aren’t good for our privacy due to we need our personal space and invade our privacy that is an inherent right that the people have and it illogical stays recording the people if exist more innocent people than criminal and the cameras don’t help to prevent the problems, they only collect information, but the things happens and the evidence could be forgettable, the government should look for other methods to fight against the crimes because the security cameras are not the best method as a result cause unemployment and the police are not able to work and the people lose their privacy when they are recording us without our concern
It’s no secret that everyone holds their own opinion regarding the actions of police officers and other positions of authority within these past years, be it positive or negative. From the shootings of innocent and unarmed civilians to disciplinary action being taken against those that haven’t done anything unlawful, there’s rarely a day when the police force of the United States doesn’t find itself involved in some sort of controversy. No matter what side people find themselves supporting in these instances, be it the police or the civilian, it’s true that both sides can benefit from the use of these police body cameras. Police body cameras hold one main purpose and that’s to deteriorate the ever-present risk of unnecessary aggression on
After one year of body cameras, it showed the the complaints from citizens dropped about 90 percent. Body cameras help citizens with controlling their attitude and behavior. Therefore, using body cameras will be a great idea for this country. Body camera will be very useful to support a case.
Many people claim that racism no longer exists; however, the minorities’ struggle with injustice is ubiquitous. In the “Anything Can Happen With Police Around”: Urban Youth Evaluate Strategies of Surveillance in Public Places,” Michelle Fine and his comrades were inspired to conduct a survey over one of the major social issues - how authority figures use a person’s racial identity as a key factor in determining how to enforce laws and how the surveillance is problematic in public space. In the beginning of the article, she used the existed survey reports to support and justify their purpose to perform this survey. The survey analyzed urban youth interactions with authority figures, comprising police, educators, social workers and security guards.
Have you ever seen a police officer wearing a body camera? If you did, you are one of a kind, we are still debating if the police should wear them. The video recordings from body cameras provide valuable evidence while raising high concerns of privacy. The recordings cameras provide are valuable when police and civilian witness differ. I believe that police officers should wear body cameras for two important reasons.
Although officers claim they aren’t as unprofessional as everyone says, many people beg to differ. A lot of people have evidence on how they were mistreated, and how the officers weren’t at all professional. Others have been killed and seriously injured, but the idea is still up in the air after several years. To protect themselves, and others around them, police officers should be forced to wear body cameras while they’re in a case or are talking to a suspect while on duty. Having to wear body cameras would be a positive way to help the authorities to see the truth better than just having to listen to the voice recorder.
The surveillance reflects the constitution and the social contract the government has with its citizens. The source of the surveillance is the law and the
Thesis statement: Police should wear body cameras because playing body cameras could improve the public’s view of police by showing the human side, help to provide evidence when a person may not be able to, and it protects the officers and public both. Cameras Imagine there is a huge case going on where a police officer is coming under question on if dealt with a potential suspect in the correct way. Now think about the money being used to provide lawyers, a judge, a jury, etc., to handle the high profile case.
It is becoming more important for law enforcement officers (LEOs) to have video recordings of civilian contacts recorded from their own perspectives. Many times critical incidents happen out of range of the vehicle cameras. Just like most things in life, technology has found a way to make advancements in everything we do. Advancements in law enforcement are of no exception. Technology has put cameras in squad cars and now on our officers, but unlike vehicle-mounted cameras, the body-worn cameras travel with officers.
As in our regular life style being observed by cameras is fairly common. Every store has cameras that are mainly for safety, but yet we are not fully safe. Those cameras could be use to spy and kidnap people. The
The “Facial Recognition”, article on who’s watching you in public is compared to the book 1984 by George Orwell; by its use of notification to the citizens of personalized identification without consent. For example, within this book all citizens are watched through the telescreens on critique facial expressions, suspicious body language, and use of self documentation. I am strictly against these practices that 's used in this country although, it is bringing more store sales it still should not betray privacy of a customer. A customer is always bound to change their mind on certain perceptions in what they purchase in a store. With this use of betrayal of privacy within a store I believe that in today’s society they will progress even larger.
It is very important to use surveillance, but if you use it unjustly it can give more power to public order than individual rights. It causes a similar problem as the ones mentioned before, that it can prove challenging to identify if you had a good reason to use surveillance. You might not always know if you have a good enough reason to use surveillance, but you should exercise your best judgement to decide whether or not to use
Body cameras are seen as an invasion of privacy, as they provide state-owned footage. When police cameras are on, they will capture everyday civilian and police behavior that does not necessarily need to be recorded. Because it is not practical to have cameras play constantly, there must be guidelines for when police should turn their cameras on and off. Many current policies encourage the cameras to be turned on only when police are among the public (Baum,
The aim of this essay is to compare and look at the Ethical and Social issues that occur in the Information Technology industry, specifically the workplace in relation to surveillance of different forms. Types of surveillance CCTV monitoring (camera) is one of the
Big brother implies the authority that regulates and monitors information and citizens. Currently, technology developments such as closed-circuit television, black box, cell phone, and a bunch of search engines, allow to record every moves that people make and to give rise to surveillance society. Surveillance society has two sides of the coin. In this essay, I will deliver pros and cons about surveillance society and possible solutions to deal with the issue.
Topic: Surveillance cameras in public places such as malls and streets are a great idea to increase security against criminals and not a breach of privacy. Proposition: Persuade the people to support the use of CCTV in public places which can increase the presence of security in that particular area. Specific Objectives: - To discuss the uses of CCTV specifically on security and crime prevention; - To explain that “lawful” use of CCTV cameras do not violate one’s right to privacy; and - To encourage people to support the use of CCTV in the country. I.