ipl-logo

Andrew Jackson Case For The Removal Act Analysis

557 Words3 Pages

White residents of the United States clashed with the Indigenous people on land, food, and rights, without a permanent compromise. In 1829, President Andrew Jackson proposes to move all Indigenous people within America’s current territory to reservations. After being pursued for nearly thirty years, the Choctaw and the Chickasaw tribes agreed for their removal. This would allow whites to live their civilized lives as the Indigenous people cast off their savage habits in remote reservations. President Jackson’s Case for the Removal Act shows that those of power and majority decide the terms of segregation. The benefit of segregation for the white people comes from the constant push for white supremacy and white nationalism. A multicultural land shows no distinction of a race in power, which conflicts with the way ancestors of the American people lived. The powerful beliefs that run through politicians alike lead to a blind understanding of the minority damage. The one-sided argument allows whites …show more content…

President Jackson says that segregation “will free them from the power of the states; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, […]” Moreover, the government will influence the communities to be more like American society. However, President Jackson states that “as a Government we have as little right to control them as we have to prescribe laws for other nations.” The Government control versus the promised freedom shows the carelessness towards the minority. This becomes apparent when President Jackson talks of humanity and philanthropy. He acknowledges the graves and the culture the Indigenous people will leave behind, but feels that what they offer justifies the losses. The Government offerings look as a great sacrifice for a race without a voice or

Show More
Related

  • What Is Andrew Jackson's Experience With Racism Toward Native Americans?

    1874 Words  | 8 Pages

    The policies made by Jackson during his presidency were indeed motivated by racism, and he used them to ruin the lives of Native Americans, eliminate their culture and uniqueness, as well as to drive them out of their homes. One way Jackson’s

    Read More

  • Summary Of Andrew Jackson And His Indian War

    995 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States of America, was elected to presidency in the country’s 1828 elections. It was however on June 28, 1830, that Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act and in turn, allowed the relocation of Indians in areas far from the white settlements. The new law gave Jackson power to provide the voluntary relocation of Indians to the trans-Mississippi West. In “Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars” Remini gives insight in the relationship Jackson had with the Native Americans. Whilst Jackson is portrayed as a slave owner and racist, Remini explains the man’s logic with regard to the hierarchy of men in the United States.

    Read More

  • Cherokees Response To The Indian Removal Act Of 1830

    1887 Words  | 8 Pages

    This essay considers how Cherokees responded to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This Act, promoted by the seventh President of the United States Andrew Jackson, enabled the United States government to relocate the “Five Civilized Tribes” to reservations west of the Mississippi River. The majority of Americans supported removing Southeastern Amerindians. American settlers were eager to gain access to Cherokee lands in Georgia. The Indian Removal Act resulted in the mass transplantation of Indian tribes known as the “Trail of Tears.”

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Case Analysis

    722 Words  | 3 Pages

    Therefore, do not twist my words of my acknowledgment that my client is a heroic man, but just as anyone else he did inflict a negative side. On December 6, 1830, my client did his annual message to congress, document C, which his words sounded ignorant. However, this was not ignorant of anger or hatred towards our beloved neighbors, but an ignorance of being oblivious of how his speech sounded once vocalized. The president, Mr. Jackson, stated “... Doubtless it will be painful to leave the graves of their fathers; but (why should they not do what) our ancestors did or than our children are now doing?”

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Case Analysis

    354 Words  | 2 Pages

    Two days before being released from the hospital, Jackson met with the unit’s lawyer 2nd Lieutenant Neville Harper. When Jackson met the young man, it shocked him to find their attorney looked more like a high school student than an army officer and never defended a real case in his life, much less a high profile one involving a senior officer. His only wins were during mock trials in law school and it solidified Jackson’s belief they were being railroaded for political purposes. In addition, the young man couldn’t tell him who the convening authority was because he’d been told the same thing, ‘classified’.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

    Read More

  • Why Is The Indian Removal Act Enforced

    544 Words  | 3 Pages

    The president during the enforcement of the Indian removal act, Andrew Jackson, thought that the indigenous people were less civilized and moral than the settlers, although many of the tribes had adapted to the European lifestyle. He did not believe that the more “civilized” people should live alongside the indigenous people. When congress passed the Indian removal act in 1830 that stated that it was legal to force indigenous people off of their land, he fully enforced it, pushing tribes west. When there was an auction of Cherokee land, he claimed he couldn 't do anything to stop it, but he didn 't truly want to. The indigenous people wanted to coexist in peace, as Red Jacket stated, “‘You have got our country but are not satisfied; you want to force your religion upon us….

    Read More

  • The Indian Removal Act: The First American Civil War

    809 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act In the beginning, The United States recognized Indian tribes as separate nations of people entitled to their own lands that could only be obtained from them through treaties. Due to inexorable pressures of expansion, settlement, and commerce, however, treaties made with good intentions were often perceived as unsustainable within just a few years. The Indians felt betrayed and frequently reacted with violence when land promised to them forever was taken away. For the most part, however, they directed their energies toward maintaining their tribal identity while living in the new order. The United States under the leadership of President Andrew Jackson dealt with settling the Indians the most humane possible way, for

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Power Analysis

    996 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the mid-1800s the United States began to rapidly grow, the population of the whites sadly outnumbered the Indians tremendously. Due to the growth of the white Americans, they required large amounts of land in order to suit their needs and to provide for their society. President Andrew Jackson’s power influenced many of the white Americans that the land belonged to them, his power as president allowed him to forcefully move the Cherokee west of the Mississippi. The Jackson administration’s decision to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi river in the 1830s significantly changed the previous social, political, and economic policies pursued by the colonies and The United States towards the American Indian tribes.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was said to be a divergent president in many ways, especially for his unique background compared to the wealthy ones of the previous presidents. He started off as an orphan and made his way up to becoming a general in the military, then became a frontier and started working in office soon later. Jackson’s presidency was held during an age known as the Age of the Common Man where he was determined to always do what was best for the common people and protect them from the powers of the rich and the privileged. With his success as a populist in his own Jacksonian Democracy, Jackson was able to seduce the American people but frighten the political and economic elite. Although Jackson had good intentions with what he wanted to accomplish

    Read More

  • Cherokee Nation 1830 Analysis

    402 Words  | 2 Pages

    On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Andrew Jackson's Message To Congress And Indian Removal Act

    281 Words  | 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress and “Samuel’s Memory” are about the same topic, the Indian Removal Act, but are two completely different pieces. Both are told from two very different points of views. Both evoke very different emotions. One was written to persuade people and justify the Act and the other was written to show the horror of the Act and the devastation of how the act affected the Indian people. While both are about the same topic, they are nowhere near the same.

    Read More

  • Junípero Serra

    1262 Words  | 6 Pages

    Losing one’s cultural knowledge, and therefore the reality of their culture, allows others to have control over their collective and individual consciousness as well as their destiny. In this case, it is clear that the United States government has had the dominant relationship over the Native

    Read More

  • The Trans-Mississippi West

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

    Read More

  • Native Americans In The 19th Century

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

    Read More

More about Andrew Jackson Case For The Removal Act Analysis

Open Document