Self-Esteem Theory

Having self-interest is part of being human and “the purpose of morality, she argues, is to teach us what is in our self-interest, what produces happiness”, this sentence also ties with the words “self” and “ego”. Having an ego or being an egoist has its limits, though. People should care for themselves, but also care for others because ego is more of a balance in which one can’t work without the other. The beneficial side of ego is that it “constitutes the essential identity of a human being” (Rand Introduction) but the detrimental side, according to visionlaunch.com, is that it can “completely eliminate objectivity”.

According to this viewpoint, it is important to analyze how people perceive themselves to be viewed by significant others, such as peers, classmates, relatives, and so on. Some modern theories of self-esteem have focused on the norms and values of the cultures and communities in which people are raised. For instance, Crocker and her colleagues have argued that some people experience collective self-esteem because they are especially likely to base their self esteem on their social identities as relating to specific groups (Luhtanen & Crocker, 1992). Leary, Tambor, Terdal, and Downs (1995) have stated a distinct and significant social account of self-esteem. Socio meter theory begins with the hypothesis that humans have as

The Optimal Distinctiveness Framework (Brewer, 1991) challenges this assumption by arguing that people are motivated to choose social identities that satisfy the need for inclusion and distinctiveness, regardless of whether or not the distinctiveness is positive. Self-Categorization Theory focus on the conditions for and consequences of social identification, whereas Social Identity Theory focus explain the emergence of social categorization and the reasons for in-group favoritism. A social categorization is more likely to be used if it is one that a person uses often or if it fits the context. Whether or not it is relevant to the context depends on if it corresponds to observed differences between people in the situation, or if it is helps to make sense of behavior in accordance to

Within normal populations, high self-esteem is characterized by a general fondness or love for oneself and low self-esteem is characterized by mildly positive or ambivalent feelings toward oneself. In extreme cases, low self-esteem people hate themselves, but this kind of self-loathing occurs in clinical populations, not in normal populations (Baumeister, Tice, & Hutton, 1989). Generally conceptualized as a part of the self-concept, to some self-esteem is one of the most important parts of the self-concept. Indeed, for a period of time, so much attention was given to self-esteem that it seemed to be synonymous with self-concept in literature on the self (Rosenberg 1976, 1979). There is a vast research literature in which the self-concept is considered not in motivational terms but for its

It refers to the feelings people develop concerning the level of control over their destinies. People with internal locus of control are more likely to take responsibility for their actions, usually have a strong sense of self-efficacy. Whereas, people with external locus of control blame outside forces for their circumstances, do not believe that they can change their situation through their own efforts, and frequently feel hopeless or powerless in the face of difficult

We chase happiness in order to achieve a good life,

In a number of Role Theories, namely functionalist, structural, organizational theories, “[…] conformity is viewed as a good thing; social integration and personal satisfaction are greater when persons conform to their own and others’ expectations.” (Biddle, 79) But individuals that engage outside the norms are labeled as deviants, and the individual’s inability to conform to standard expectations of behavior is explained by insufficient socialization, or a mismatch between the individual’s personality and the behavioral expectations. (Jackson,

Having empathy is a liability when taking moral action rather than a guide because having empathy leads to bias, a lack of reason, and confusion between empathy and compassion. One’s empathy is a hindrance because having empathy can lead to being unfairly biased for or against a certain cause, idea, or person. An example of this

1. Self esteem is simply put the thoughts and feelings we have about ourselves. When we think poorly about ourselves our self esteem will also be worse, however when we think positively about us as people our self esteem rises. Beebe (2008) wrote, “Closely related to your self- concept, or your description of who you are, is your self- esteem, your evaluation of who you are. Non verbal inner speech or self talk is a major influence of self esteem.

The first type are those people who actually know they are either good looking, intelligent, etc. but they actually still feel inferior, which can be a mysterious feeling of not being good enough. It can either be caused by a bad experience that made him or her feel

Desire satifacationist has many problems with happiness in the sense that desires can be based on false beliefs, disappointment, impoverished desires. The first one deals with false beliefs and can a person be really happy with false beliefs. According to Shafer-Landau “Fulfilling those desires based on false belief need not improve our welfare,” (p 47). If the false desires do not fulfill or improve our welfare, then why would you continue to peruse these false beliefs? Another problem is disappointing, with the desired certification.