The theories of love always have been an intensely spiritual affair that in its highest permits us to touch divinity. Love is the primordial urge and the basis of creation. Throughout the different stages of our lives, we receive and give love to so many different people. We experience the pleasures, and know well the pains that come with love. This love assumes many different forms in the phenomenal world and gives a variety of experiences to us. By experiencing all these stages and moments we have distinguished the difference between kinds of loves. We can understand the love we have for our pets is different than our love for our parents, loving a substantial other is not the same, as loving as grandparent. There is a difference between the love between friends, and the love within a relationship. While these forms of love keep changing based on one’s relationship, the Principle of Love remains unchanged.
Selfishness is construed as people who take for their benefit whereas Selflessness is determined by the act of giving. Selfish people might make life harder for others but it surely is for one’s personal benefit, while selfless people make life more gratifying for those around them. This is how many of us have distinguished between selfishness and selflessness. But what if we combine selflessness and selfishness with love? Generally speaking, selfless love gets a warmer welcome and is more widely accepted as good in comparison to selfish love. But do these two different
Love is a universal emotion. At some point in their lifetime, people will experience some form of love, whether it be romantic, platonic, or familial; however, not everyone experiences love the same way. There are many factors that contribute to the way a person views love, receives love, and expresses love: their family dynamic, past relationships, and most importantly, their culture. One of the factors that most influences how a person receives and expresses romantic love is the culture and society surrounding them. In Junot Diaz’s
In today’s world, one can find many instances of selfishness, whether it be corruption, killing, or even breaking a heart. However, like a diamond in the rough, someone who is truly selfless is hard to come by. One example of a selfless writer is C.S. Lewis, author of Till We Have Faces. Lewis wrote some of his novels in a way to not only educate the world that selflessness will always win but also the fact that selfishness will always lose. One of Lewis’s notable works -- “Till We Have Faces” -- clearly demonstrates how selfishness loses but selflessness wins.
Altruism and Egoism There once lived an altruistic person that loved to helped others. But that altruistic person was also a very egoistic person. Egoism is about the selfishness and the self-interest of human beings, while altruism is more about the selflessness, and the well-being of others. At first sight, egoism and altruism may seem to be two completely different behaviors.
Everybody is both selfish and selfless; we all give and take. Nobody is wholly one or the other. When to be one or the other, or how is an act one or the other, are the questions. Selfishness
The practice of selfishness is in itself the inability to practice self-love; and therefore the incapacity to love. Selfishness is in essence the mere opposite of self-love. | One can only love another inasmuch as one loves oneself, otherwise one is never loving freely. Love is not specific, but the wisdom to understand that we all are one and not objects of
Robert Nozick gives quite a clear and relatively detached explanation of romantic love, its main purposes, and elements, as well as its limitations in his Love Bonds essay. I his view romantic love has three principal elements that must be present. According to Nozick, the first feature is a sense that well-being of one of the partners is directly “tied up” with another’s. In other words, when good or bad things happen to the person one loves, they indirectly happen to another partner. Furthermore, Nozick considers that both partners must abandon some of their autonomy.
Johnson talks about the different ways selfishness can be taken. It can either be good or bad. When it comes to good selfishness, it means that you are being selfish for the benefit of you and the other person. Now when it comes to bad selfishness, it consists of a person only thinking about themselves, of their own happiness. These actions have consequences, just like John said, “If you exploit people they become less likely to cooperate with you voluntarily” (PsychologyToday).
Browne mentions that, “In fact, we can’t avoid a very significant conclusion: Everyone is selfish. Selfishness isn’t really an issue, because everyone selfishly seeks his own happiness” (Browne 154). He then goes on to state that, “The unselfishness concept is a merry-go-round that has no ultimate purpose” (Browne 155). In
Love is essential to human life, almost as important as food and water, though most of the time it can be scary. Many different texts can help illustrate this idea. “What Love Isn’t”, a poem by Yrsa Daley- Ward, demonstrates how love is not always easy. Love is often challenging, difficult, and never the way it is portrayed in movies. “How I Found True Love in an Arranged Marriage”, an article by Surabhi Surendra, also demonstrates similar ideas.
Deep, intense, and long-lasting individuals use love to express their true emotions. Love is the passionate affection and desire felt by lovers for each other. While love can be so powerful, it is also demanding. Love is unique, love is special. Whether it is the impacts, love and an addiction both have on the body to how they change a person or to how they make a person feel, love is an addiction.
At the top of the triangle is intimacy, while passion makes up the bottom left corner of the triangle, and decision and commitment make up the bottom right corner of the triangle. The position of these elements within the triangle has no significant relevance, but it useful to explain the overall model. This newer model of love has been proven in research to be more reliable and is more generally accepted, as it includes factors that are included in other models, therefore, it is the primary focus of this text. Within this theory, the intimacy component refers to feeling close and connected in a relationship. These feelings make up warmth in a relationship.
According to this theory, nature of love is changing fundamentally and it can create either opportunities for democracy or chaos in life (Beck & Beck- Gernsheim, 1995). Love, family and personal freedom are three key elements in this theory. This theory states that the guidelines, rules and traditions which used to rule personal relationships have changed. “Individuals are now confronted with an endless series of choices as part of constructing, adjusting, improving or dissolving the unions they form with others” (Giddens, 2006). For instance, marriage nowadays depends on the willingness of the couples rather than for economic purposes or the urge to form family.
When a person is birthed into the world they automatically began to feel loved by their parent. Love is an emotion and an Instinct that every human knows how to receive love or give love. When it becomes time for person to discover love within a significant other the person is looking for a soulmate. A soulmate is defined as “a person who is perfectly suited to another in temperament. ”(“soul mate”).
Love can be hard to understand, love changes people in numerous ways leading to many writers expressing change from love in their works. From Plato’s views that love completes us to the Buddha’s thoughts that love is just a terrestrial desire that leads to suffering. (Cleary) Many famous writers and philosophers have differing views on love and have written as such. However, despite the differences in opinion, many wrighers would agree that love can change a person immensely.
Whenever there is no reason explained behind the selfish act being committed, some do not mind at all while others think that the people who made the act of selfishness no longer cares about their