Semantic Profile is an OWL file which encapsulates patient details as entered by the patient, nurse and doctor. This file is initially generated as soon as the patient submits the questionnaire.
Later, the same is updated by the Clinic officials (e.g., nurse) and finally, by one or more doctors. The structure (schema) of the semantic profile follows from AnsweredQuestionnaire ontology and Patient ontology. So, even though it is an independent OWL file, it can be considered as an instance of AnsweredQuestionnaire ontology and Patient ontology. The former is initially created by the application, and the latter is automatically generated from the former by using OWL2 feature called Property Insertion.
3.3 Ontology Reasoning
Reasoners are application
…show more content…
There are two main strategies of reasoning, forward chaining and backward chaining [Giarratano et.al.
2004]. Forward chaining starts from existing facts and applying rules to derive all possible facts while backward chaining starts with the desired conclusion and perform backward to find
supporting facts. Optimized algorithms and techniques may be used to improve the performance of the reasoning process. User applications typically interact with inference engines via APIs
(application programming interfaces). These APIs normally support selecting reasoning strategies, features, and operations, storing facts and querying the result data from the knowledge base, etc.
We have adopted the forward chaining strategy in OntoDiabtetic reasoning (Fig 8). Rules are applied to the asserted facts, and the entailed statements are immediately added to the knowledge base until it reaches the conclusion (inferred fact). The f orward chaining algorithm is given below :-
Step 1: Let ‘f’ be a fact that is to be added to the knowledge base.
Step 2: Find all implications ‘I’ that have ‘f’ as a premise.
Step
…show more content…
2013 ] . Rules give an additional level of expressivity that cannot be offered by web ontology languages (OWL). It enhances the ontology language by allowing one to describe relations that cannot be described using description logic used in OWL
[Rattanasawad et.al. 2013]. The rule language also allows sharing and reuse of existing rules between different systems. OWL ontology is extended using rules. OWL 2 reasoners such as
Pellet and HermiT can be used to reason over such ontologies extended using these rules.
In semantic web, a rule is expressed in the form of If-then statements containing logical functions and operations. A rule consists of an antecedent (body of the rule) and a consequent (head of the rule). The antecedent contains conditions combined using logical operators while the consequent part contains conclusions. If the rule statement(s) are true, new knowledge is added to the knowledge base. Informally, the rule can be read as: if the body is true, then the head must be true [Birte et.al. 2009]. These rules can be defined in different rule languages or
Logical is an expression that either calculates the TRUE or FALSE. If will return TRUE if the expression is FALSE
Chapter 5: Logical proofs teaches you about the different types of reasoning and examples
Ankita Singhal once said,“A small change can make a big difference. You are the only one who can make our world a better place to inhabit. So, don’t be afraid to take a stand .” This quote highlights the fact that there comes a time when the regulations need to be tested not just for your benefit, but for the benefit of the society you live in. Rules are a set of regulations that govern a group of people.
Through providing facts and data, the authors demonstrate the usage of logical
This house organization basically stands to construct and enforce its own rules, as it also judges the right qualifications
1. In your own words, briefly, define “Meaningful Use”, “ARRA” and “HITECH ACT” as they relate to healthcare information technology (1 -2 sentence for each term). - Meaning Use: it is the way in which EHR is use to help improve the quality, safety, efficiency, in the health care profession. It also help provide privacy and security for patient health record.
C. Further languages should be integerable without modifying the source code. D. The architecture should allow the integration of new modules, e.g. for additional implicit expressions. E. When needed, adding and modifying rules should be simple. HeidelTime is developed as a rule based system.
the way Anderson approaches deductive reasoning is by being general with the topic and moving into a specific conclusion. In the question Anderson asks Meyer begins with a generalization of how we as society have become so engrossed in other aspects of our lives that we lack the necessary attention. This was one of the questions Anderson asked the expert of multitasking during the interview conducted via technology. It demonstrated that the author would spend the necessary time and energy to bring relevant experts for the audience to achieve logos
A good reasoning is a reasoning that leads to certain, true and valid conclusions. There are two kinds of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Both processes include the process of finding a conclusion from multiple premises although the way of approach may differ. Deductive reasoning uses general premises to make a specific conclusion; inductive reasoning uses specific premises to make a generalized conclusion. The two types of reasoning can be influenced by emotion in a different manner because of their different process to yield a conclusion.
There are multiple examples and graphs within the article to demonstrate why and how these rules and mathematical vocabulary expires. “13 Rules that expire” will also notify the teachers on how they can teach student math long term instead of short
Common Core State Standards CC.6.R.L.1: Key Ideas and Details: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. CC.6.R.I.3: Key Ideas and Details: Analyze in detail how a key individual, event, or idea is introduced, illustrated, and elaborated in a text (e.g., through examples or anecdotes).
Stephen Toulmin, a twentieth-century philosopher,realized that well developed arguments consist of six parts. The parts are the following terms: data, claim, warrants, qualifiers, rebuttals, and backing. These six parts form the Toulmin Model of Argument. This model is beneficial when trying to evaluate an argument being read. Toulmin’s model can also be used as a form of organization and structure.
This means that in each culture they have specific rules for