Senator Beveridge Arguments Against The Platt Amendment

Charles Sumner and the Annexation of the Dominican Republic President Ulysses Grant attempted to annex the Dominican Republic to the United States during his first term, with support from both countries. The United States was motivated by prospects of acquiring dominance in the Caribbean, increasing its commercial avenues; the possibility of establishing a black state and by the idea of Manifest Destiny Doctrine intermingled with Monroe Doctrine. The Dominican Republic, on the other hand, was motivated by the desire to satisfy financial interest and the intent of defeating a rebellion from the Haitian government. The main issues that came out were politics, economics, race, gender and religion. Politics; • Grant’s efforts to promote

Meanwhile in America, there was a debate whether Washington would accept colonialism. In the 1970s most Americans rejected colonialism. But now, the people having non-colonial ideology had become aged and the new generation, like Roosevelt, were keen to be imperialist. The economic condition in America made this change. Lower sales of products had created economic depression which led lower salaries and endangered the life of middle class families.

The US should not have annexed the Philippines because it would be hypocritical of Americans, the

would have to govern them as dependant since they cannot self-govern, while Beveridge believed they would benefit the U.S. economy and trade. Carnegie did not want to maintain the Philippines as a colony because the U.S. would then have to be armed and ready to fight and protect the Philippines from foreign invasion, however once again Beveridge believed the U.S. should do the opposite of what Carnegie had said, and wants to maintain colonies abroad. Albert Beveridge and Andrew Carnegie had different opinions about what the United States should do when it came to imperializing other nations; Beveridge believed that the United States should join other imperialistic nations and imperialize smaller nations, while Carnegie believed the United States should not imperialize. The time period during this conflict of ideas between Carnegie and Beveridge happened right as when the

The Platt Amendment was established in 1901 which set policies intending to end the United States’ military occupation of Cuba after the Spanish-American war and it was designed to eventually grant sovereignty back to the Cuban government. It was proposed to congress by Senator Orville Platt, although it was primarily drafted by Secretary of War Elihu Root. The terms set in the Platt Amendment limited Cuba’s ability to from treaties with foreign powers that limits its own independence, make public debt with other entities to prevent other nations from having control over Cuba through debt, and it sold or leased land to the U.S. for coaling or naval stations for the United States’ own purpose. The purpose of the Plat Amendment was to prevent

Prior to annexing a territory, the American government still held immense power through the various legislations passed in the late 1800s. The Platt Amendment was utilized to prevent Cuba from entering into any agreements with foreign nations, and also granted the Americans the right to build naval stations on their soil. Executive officials in the American government began to determine themselves the supreme authority in matters regarding the recognition or restriction of

William McKinley in his thoughts on American Expansionism has identified the reasons why America had no other choice but to incorporate Philippines as a part of it. This writing has been lifted from the excerpts of an interview with William McKinley soon after Spain had surrendered in the Spanish-American war. McKinley cleverly talks in this interview about how Philippines just came and fell into the laps of America thereby suggesting the helpless stance of America. He talks about how America’s sole intention and purpose had only been to safeguard its own interests as a country. He had to order that the Spanish fleets in Manila be destroyed because if left unattended, they would have crossed the Pacific and wreaked havoc in the American states

In the late nineteenth and century, many Americans agree with the view of imperialism, but in the early twentieth century America disagreed with the overseas expansion because they believed it went against the whole U.S. believe in freedom and self-rule. Many Americans believed it was the U.S. burden to teach undeveloped countries into civilization; therefore, the U.S. helped Cuba and the Philippines after the and during Spanish-American War. As Time progressed, Americans did not want to get involved in any other war. As a result, the U.S.passed the Espionage Act of 1917 to avoid entering future warfare.

In 1899, the United States annexed the Philippines after a short but bloody war with Spain. These rich, plentiful islands full of resources were in great demand. The U.S. saw the Philippines; fighting against Spain so like them when they were rebelling, and decided to step in and aid ‘the spirit of 1776’ (Doc. A). However, the question still remains: should the United States have annexed the Philippines?

Deciding the Annexation of the Philippines Assessment: On Google Docs you need to write a three paragraph essay arguing whether or not the United States should or should not annex the Philippines. You need to use 2 pieces of evidence from the documents per paragraph. Americans might have thought that all war and chaos would have ended and stayed in the year of 1898, when we (America) won over the Spanish, in the Spanish-American war. Although, we were partially right with allowing us to have some sort of peace, we did not figure that we may have to have annex a whole different country, taking away from our “peace”.

The United States has undergone major transitional phases in order to become the country it is today. One of its greatest periods of change occurred in the years 1865 to 1940, in which the U.S.’s growing emphasis on strong economic policy changed its interactions with foreign countries, its image to foreign countries, and what role it’s willing to play in the world. These tireless efforts to become an economic powerhouse was a major driving force in the U.S. actions during this time and ultimately allowed it to change its image on the global stage from a new. To begin to understand what caused these dramatic changes in the how the U.S. interacts with the rest of the world, it is imperative to understand the origins of its more capitalist roots,

They saw it as the “perfect stepping-stones” trade with China and the rest of Asia. American business men felt it was necessary for the government to show some authority and capitalize on this opportunity. American saw Manila as their

His purpose was to justify his decision to take the Philippines for the U.S. rather than give the Philippines their

The United States of the early 20th century was one with a booming economy and a hunger for power. They had expanded westward and were looking to continue to expand their territory across the seas, in order to assert their dominance as a global superpower among the powerful nations of the time. The poor relations between Cubans and their Spanish rulers eventually led to the Treaty of Paris, which is when Spain surrendered the Philippines to the United States. It was at this point that another major divide between the American people was created. Many Americans believed that attempting to gain power over as many territories as possible was a bad idea and one that went against what America was built on.

Late president Nikita Khrushchev (from USSR), agreed to assist Castro and took immediate action. He installed missiles in Cuba, which the US thought was a threat to the security of their nation. In summary, I think that this was a defensive move by the Cubans. I most definitely agree with