Senator Stephen Douglas Argumentative Essay
Senator Stephen Douglas, hoping to lure transcontinental railroad developers away from lands acquired via the Gadsden Purchase, proposed instead to build the line farther north, so that the railway would end in Chicago and gives his home region a huge economic boost. However, federal law required that the vast unorganized areas in the middle of the country first be carved into official territories before any track could be laid.
To do so, Douglas rammed the Kansas-Nebraska Act through Congress in 1854 to create two new territories—Kansas in the South and Nebraska in the North. According to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, both territories would have to be free because they were north of the 36˚ 30 ' line. However, Douglas, aware that Southern
…show more content…
Southerners—Democrats and Whigs alike—jumped at the opportunity to open Northern territories to slavery, but Northerners recoiled, outraged that the Missouri Compromise had been violated. Riots and protests against the Kansas-Nebraska Act erupted in Northern cities.
What Douglas had failed to realize was that most Northerners regarded the Missouri Compromise to be almost sacred. The publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin and the brutal enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act had by this time awakened hundreds of thousands in the North to the horrors of slavery. Even those who benefited from Southern slavery, such as textile manufacturers, did not wish to see slavery expand further west or north. The Kansas-Nebraska Act succeeded only in shifting Northern public opinion even further away from reconciliation with the South.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act also caused the collapse of both the Whig and Democratic parties. The parties split according to section: to pass the act through Congress, Southern Whigs voted with Southern Democrats against their Northern counterparts for the first time in history. The Whigs were never able to reunite after this catastrophic divide. The Democrats survived, but Northern Democrats lost over half their seats in Congress that
Louisiana Purchase Dbq
102 Words | 1 PagesIn the era before the Civil War America was expanding westward. The Louisiana Purchase and other lands gained help to give America new land to expand on, but this leaded to issues with the division of free and slave states. As Missouri became a state they wanted to become a slave state, which caused trouble. In order to keep equilibrium between the states, Congress came up with the Missouri Compromise of 1820.The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state and Maine a free state. The Treaty also made a line within the Louisiana Territory to keep slavery from moving up the
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates Of Abraham Lincoln And Stephen A. Douglas
544 Words | 3 PagesIn 1858 in Illinois state election there was about seven debates that took place there. These seven debates were called the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. The two main people that were involved in these debates were Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas. A very short summary of what the Lincoln-Douglas Debates were about is that they were mainly discussing two main topics. These two topics were slavery and State Rights.
The Conflict Over Slavery: The Missouri Compromise
135 Words | 1 PagesThe conflict over slavery became more brutal as the United States expanded westward. It began to force Americans to either identify themselves as anti-slavery or pro-slavery. The discovery of new states led to the conflict on whether they should be admitted as free states or slaves states. Compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 were attempted to settle the conflict of free states or slave states. The Missouri Compromise declared that all new states above the line would be establish as free states, and all states below the line would be establish as slave states.
Political Compromise Between 1820 And 1860 Essay
713 Words | 3 PagesThe Northern abhorrence of slavery coupled with the hierarchical sectionalism of the South hindered any political compromise between the regions. As many Northerners didn’t require slaves
What Are The Causes Of The Missouri Compromise
205 Words | 1 PagesThe Missouri Compromise was made as an attempt to deal with the debate that had been going on about slavery. It lasted thirty-four years, but never truly made the North orouth totally happy with the situation. Although the Missouri Compromise did push back the debate on slavery in Missouri, it did not solve the problem as a whole. The tension between the North and South was, in fact reduced for a period of time. Once the Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional, the tension once again grew.
Divisive Sectional Issues Of The 1950's
647 Words | 3 Pages“Lincoln identified the westward expansion of slavery as the key issue” (video). The issue brings in the question of the delicate balance of power in the Congress. “Just as northerners believed westward expansion essential to their economic well-being, southern leaders became convinced that slavery must expand or die” writes Eric Foner (483). Without slavery expanding with the addition of new states, slave states would permanently assume a minority position of representation within government. The interests of Southern pro-slavery states would not be secure in a Union subjugated by non-slaveholding states.
Why Did The North Win The Civil War Essay
1242 Words | 5 PagesThe Civil War was the result of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become states. When Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1860, as the first Republican president on a platform promising to keep slavery out of the territories, seven slave states in the deep South seceded and formed a new nation, the Confederate States of America. Military during the Civil War was off, but equalled out in terms of stats, North having better leadership and South having better weapons. As the United States expanded westward, two new territories were created from the issue of slavery in the United States. The U.S. government let the two new territories decide whether or not to allow slavery.
To What Extent Was The Compromise Of 1850
670 Words | 3 PagesIt also drew an imaginary line west of the Mississippi and North of the 36 degrees 30 minutes latitude in which slavery would not be allowed after 1820. The Missouri Compromise settled the dispute between North and South and brought peace for nearly three decades. The Compromise of 1820 remained law until the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
The Two Party's Second Party System
77 Words | 1 PagesThe Second Party System was composed of the Democratic Party which was led by Jackson and the Whig Party which was led by Clay. The Kansas-Nebraska Act would allow residents of the Kansas and Nebraska territory to vote for slavery over popular sovereignty. This act would make debates over slavery grow; with this the Northern Whigs and Northern Democrats (both anti-slavery) would split off into new political parties. The American Party and the Republican Party would
Differences Between Lincoln And Frederick Douglass
691 Words | 3 PagesAbraham Lincoln, Frederic Douglass, were one of the most appealing well-known speakers, people who did believe that slavery was morally wrong and devote their lives to fight for freedom. However, there are several differences between the view of the Constitution’s position differences between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Kansas-Nebraska Act indicated that the recognition of slavery should be determined by the decision of these residents (popular or squatter sovereignty). This act itself conflicted heavily with the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, which was essentially seen as the admittance of slavery anywhere in the country. This act made a political issue of confrontation between North and South.
Fredrick Douglas Argumentative Essay
755 Words | 4 Pages“It is your reaction to adversity itself that determines how your life’s story will develop.” – Dieter F. Uchtdorf. Two different people, who both endured slavery were continuously being knocked down, were able to achieve greatness and respect. Sadly, both of these upstanding men bore slavery, they had extremely incompatible experiences in slavery. Booker was freed in his teenage years and did not bear heinous and sinister acts against him; on the other hand Fredrick witnessed and withstood twisted actions that no one deserves.
Essay On Sectional Tensions
734 Words | 3 PagesFollowing Jackson’s election into office and the consequent overturn of an entire political party, his Democratic-Republicans could not build a loyal following. Opposition to the rival party, the Federalists, was the source of Democratic-Republican unity, and once the former faded, so did the latter. The Louisiana Purchase was a pivotal turn of events that contributed to sectionalism. Upon acquiring so much land, America was faced with the issue of how to purpose it. These frontier states were ravaged with land exhaustion, and planters continuously moved out west for more land to cultivate.
Michael Holt The Fate Of Their Country Summary
595 Words | 3 PagesThe fate of their country by Michael Holt is a book made up of 3 to 4 sections, titled Pandora's Box, The Wilmot Proviso, The Compromise of 1850, The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Author Michael Holt examines what caused the Civil War and the Pandora’s Box of sectional dissent territorial slavery issue over slavery into all current and future western territories also the Missouri crisis debate. It wasn’t slavery per the book but the debates about the extension of slavery into new territories and states that sent the nation careening into civil war, argues writer Michael Holt. He gives his readers an analysis of the partisan political forces, on the great debate over the extension of slavery into the American West.
What Was The Missouri Compromise
261 Words | 2 PagesAs westward expansion continued, the number of free states would be twice that of the already existing, and only, slave states. The Missouri compromise showed the different opinions that the regions, mainly the north and south, had about slavery. In the north they
Compromises Between 1820 And 1860
1121 Words | 5 PagesHowever, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.
More about Senator Stephen Douglas Argumentative Essay
Louisiana Purchase Dbq
102 Words | 1 PagesThe Lincoln-Douglas Debates Of Abraham Lincoln And Stephen A. Douglas
544 Words | 3 PagesThe Conflict Over Slavery: The Missouri Compromise
135 Words | 1 PagesPolitical Compromise Between 1820 And 1860 Essay
713 Words | 3 PagesWhat Are The Causes Of The Missouri Compromise
205 Words | 1 PagesDivisive Sectional Issues Of The 1950's
647 Words | 3 PagesWhy Did The North Win The Civil War Essay
1242 Words | 5 PagesTo What Extent Was The Compromise Of 1850
670 Words | 3 PagesThe Two Party's Second Party System
77 Words | 1 PagesDifferences Between Lincoln And Frederick Douglass
691 Words | 3 PagesFredrick Douglas Argumentative Essay
755 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Sectional Tensions
734 Words | 3 PagesMichael Holt The Fate Of Their Country Summary
595 Words | 3 PagesWhat Was The Missouri Compromise
261 Words | 2 PagesCompromises Between 1820 And 1860
1121 Words | 5 Pages