For a person to find his or her path in the world and to lead others effectively, one need to develop a clear vision of what she or he is aiming to accomplish and be able to communicate that vision with others to gain support. However, each person has a different vision and as a leader one’s personal vision, influence the kind of the personal leadership philosophy; he or she have. This explains why different people, demonstrate different personal leadership philosophy. In short, personal leadership philosophy consists of how a person views leadership and describes how he or she regards himself as a leader. Creating a leadership philosophy is a personal process which enables a person to understand what she or he believe leadership
Contingency Theory Contingency Theory Concepts A change in leadership research from concentrating on only the leader to looking at both the leader and the situation the leader is working in A leader-match theory: significance of aligning a leader’s style with the needs of a particular situation. Contingency theory is a theory by Fiedler that is a leader-match theory (Northhouse, 2010). In this theory leaders are matched to situations that they may fit in. Not only does the contingency theory look at the leader, but also it assesses the situation the leader works in. The effectiveness of a leader depends on how well they fit into a particular situation.
At the top of the organizational structure, the leader needs skills and abilities that are different from those needed by a department manager or department head. The position theory therefore links the characteristics and qualities of the leader and the administrative position through which he works. It does not deny what the leadership needs and characteristics, but they relate to the circumstances in which the leader lives and to the administrative position he is exposed to on the basis that the factors of the situation and the variables associated with him determine the characteristics that the leader And works to achieve leadership
With these perspectives, a leader must possess necessary traits or character to influence others to run the organization or the unit effectively. According to Maxwell, leadership is influence while Mumford also defines it as transformational (Leadership Skills: Conclusions and Future Direction, 2000) of which it requires intelligence and competence. An author of Kakistocracy, states that leadership without intelligence gives rise to kakistocracy or an organization that is ruled by the unqualified managers and leaders. It entails integrity as well. According to him, without integrity, intelligence and competence will just become effective instruments for undesirable misconduct of leaders and managers.
Leaders can be designated by the organization or emerge from the group during its development. Either way, leaders function to mobilize the group into action and give direction as to what approach the group should take to completes tasks and overcome challenges. Interestingly, leaders do not all use the same technique to lead but, apply different leadership styles to achieve the desired result. A good leader can be a powerful catalyst for group member engagement and increase the effectiveness of the work group. While a poor leader will frustrate group members and discourage them from working together and putting forth their best efforts.
to the organizational goals and objectives will be made possible. Your ultimate goal is to make sure that members are encouraged to follow group objectives instead of their own personal objectives; which could have a direct implication on the success of the organization. In selecting or developing a leadership style, you must know that how you react to problems, resolve crisis, relate to members and reward or punish them are some of the ways that you going to be judged by your members. Your effectiveness will depend on how you can influence and control your members towards the common final goals and objectives. The financial position of the organization has a direct correlation with your leadership style and the success of a program or the
Leadership is taking a group of people and being able to influence and motivate them to complete a task that is better for the organization. In order to be a good leader, you need to be able to have the trust of the people you are influencing and motivating. This trust is not given to you, it is earned. This trust is earned by the leader’s attributes which is what people see when they say that is a good leader. The first attribute that makes a good leader is their character.
Leaders in positions of authority pride themselves on being able to fix the problems that other people can’t resolve. Facing an adaptive challenge, it’s tough for leaders to acknowledge that the problem is beyond their expertise. They can deal with it by framing right context, identifying the key issues that need to be dealt with, and then challenging people to take responsibility for addressing those problems. A leader has to say that s/he don’t know rather than taking a wrong decision, which is contrary to my earlier belief that leader has to know everything and take decision action in all situation in order to gain the trust of others. Adaptive problems allow leaders to change their values, priorities and ways of doing things and helps comprehend that adaptive work is conservative and progressive.