ABSTRACTS:
Goods and Service Tax is a value added tax on both goods and services as against the prevailing VAT only on goods. Some of the most important gains from the GST reform are that it is expected to broaden the tax base, enhance export competitiveness by comprehensively relieving domestic consumption taxes on exports, reduce distortions in the economy through a more comprehensive input tax credit, ensure greater regional equity by getting rid of inter-state sales tax and having a destination-based tax and also help to create a seamless national market by removing inter-state trade barriers. It is expected that this reform will significantly help to reduce the compliance cost for taxpayers by simplifying and harmonizing the tax structure
…show more content…
The central VAT i.e. Cenvat which is currently levied has a narrow base and multiple rates and is levied on goods at the production stage. The value added in subsequent stages is not included in the base in case of Cenvat. In the Central GST that has been proposed, the base will be expanded by merging the service tax with the Cenvat, extended to wholesale and retail levels and will be simplified to have only one or two rates. The merger of service tax in GST helps to ensure not only a more comprehensive input tax credit but also relieves the tax on exports. The State GST will expand the base of the prevailing VAT to include services and the tax will be simplified by merging a number of other taxes such as motor vehicles tax, entertainment tax, goods and passengers’ tax, electricity duty and entry taxes including those levied in lieu of octroi referring to the local taxes on the entry of goods into a municipal area for consumption, use or sale. A significant gain in minimizing distortions and reducing compliance cost for taxpayers can be brought about through the harmonization of tax rates and administration across the …show more content…
Although the desirability of the reform is not in doubt, however making a transition to GST involves considerable work as well as formidable challenges for the Government. In India, it is leviable by both central and state governments unlike in many other countries where GST is a centralized tax which implies that both the structure and administration of the levy will have to emerge after detailed negotiations and bargaining between the centre, the 29 states as well as the two Union Territories with legislatures. The interests of the states do not always coincide and considerable effort is needed to persuade them to adopt a uniform or a broadly harmonized structure and administrative system for the tax given the sharp differences in the structure of the economy and sales tax revenue across the
Sales tax is income elastic; because of this fact, consumers have a higher tax incidence and carry the burden. From this, it has been evidenced that the tax burden is vertically unequitable and can be seen as unfair to the less fortunate. Sales tax is paid by retailers, which is dependent upon their sales revenue. However, since the demand of consumers is inelastic and can vary based on market and economic conditions, this burden is felt more by lower income individuals and families. However, it is important to note that the tax burden is independent of who physically pays the tax.
I told you this is taxation without representation. They think they can just become more strict and demanding out of nowhere? We will show them. We must configure against the parliament. That is the fastest way to ban this act.
The Sugar Act caused alarm in the American colonies because of the expected economic disadvantages, and its difficult implementation in all thirteen colonies. Added to this was a general post-war depression that affected the colonies. It was this combination of factors which provided the background for the oppositional activities. One of the steps taken, was to threat with a boycott all of English products. Meanwhile rumors of a possible new act which was being prepared by the British added to the growing tension in the American
The idea of a federalist government is great, however, it has some downsides as well. Some advantages of federalism include keeping the government closer to the people, where states have the freedom and authority to make government decisions to local preferences. Federalism also allows local differences to reflected in the state and local government policy and reduce conflicts, this reduces the friction between interests and lessens conflict. The independent subnational governments allow for flexibility and experimentation, where successful policy innovations in one state can be adopted by other states and also the federal government. The achievement of at least some national goals is made easier by the participation of independent subnational
Britain set up the unfair taxes because they wanted to and were able to do
Atkins, Chris. " Tax Reform and Revenue Neutrality: President 's Panel Should Avoid the Redistribution of 1986. " Tax Foundation. July 13, 2005. Accessed October 25, 2016.
A study was conducted in Illinois as this federal law was implemented and it found that after the tax increase, salons found a 26% decrease in clients. This shows the benefits of increasing taxes in order to improve the health of the common
The article includes important issues which covered the higher tax rates in many countries. One issue that was brought up was the argument between the two economists, over the United States higher that even Democrats’ boldest plan to increase taxes on the wealthy would do little to reverse the rich’s gains. On the other hand, many of the Republican tax proposals on the table might increase income inequality. Also, the United States has had higher tax rates without stifling growth or encouraging the concentration of income in the hands of the very rich. Lastly, the United States is being accustomed to a level of inequality.
In this essay, I will show some of the benefits of implementing a single flat income tax. I will also some of the effects the flat tax will have on the lower class, middle class, and the upper class. I will then show the effects of implementing a flat tax on the United States economy. The annual cost of compliance in America is $370 billion.
Why do we need money? Do we need money because of our wants or needs, or both? Money is an essential aspect in our society in which we use to supply our needs and wants. Everyone in our society thinks differently in respect towards if you have more money than more problem. In the contrary, if I were to give you a million dollars I highly doubt you will have more problems instead more problems solved because you have more money.
Assignment #2 Question 1: What is the purpose of tort law? What types of damages are available in tort lawsuits? Primarily, the purpose of tort law is to provide relief to injured parties for harms and/or damages caused by the person being sued for tort as well as to impose liability on parties responsible for the harm, which is ultimately aimed to deter others from committing harmful acts, whether intentional or unintentional. In tort law, damages extend not only to physical injury sustained and/or personal safety, but also to another person’s property, dignity, and reputation (emotional pain and suffering) that is recognized by statute or common law (protected interest) as a legitimate basis for liability.
Boom! The door slams down, agents are rushing in the room yelling “put your hands up”! The suspect yells “don’t shoot” and drops his gun onto the floor. Today being a federal agent is very dangerous. Just think at what you see on the news about federal agents.
Although the current government is using the progressive tax system, there have been many attempts to introduce different systems such as flat tax system, and this is an argument against those attempts. Plan: The article first provides some background information about the Presidential election, and start explaining the relationship between progressive tax system and wealth redistribution. After that the article lists out different reasons why progressive tax system contributes more to the society than other tax systems like flat tax
The federal tax system is plagued with issues: It doesn 't raise sufficient revenue to back government spending, it is unpredictable, it makes results that are unreasonable, and it impedes monetary productivity. This part examines a few approaches to enhance charges, including making an esteem included duty, expanding natural taxes, improving the corporate expense, treating low-and center pay workers evenhandedly and productively, and guaranteeing suitable tax collection of high-wage family units. A good tax system raises the incomes expected to fund government spending in a way that is as basic, evenhanded, and development well growth as could reasonably be expected. The United States does not have a good tax system.
Richard K. Armey says that multiple politicians have put forth their own tax code ideas, but Armey thinks we should support one that is “simple, fair, and pro-growth.” The one in place does not live up to either of these standards. It is not simple, in fact Dan Schaefer declares that the taxation system is too complicated and long. He notes that the government has “amended, repealed, or added to more than 4,000 sections of the code” (Schaefer). Neither is it fair or pro-growth; Allyson Jeffs believes that companies make their decisions based on whether or not they can dodge the income tax.