Although he can process that human beings have feelings, that doesn’t stop him from committing violence against them. Adding a villain in the story makes the plot summary more memorable and interesting; it also creates a thought-provoking story. In the end, Rainsford’s assumption is accurate; Zaroff is indeed a psychopath, labeling him conceited, unstable, selfish, pretentious and a swindler. Overall, just because someone owns an island and wears nice clothes doesn’t make him or her a good person; how someone acts and treats others is the way to tell the type of person he or she
Imagine thinking about another society that all had handicaps and you being able to keep that thought in your head and not them. This is why I would not like to live in a utopia like this. In “The Most Dangerous Game” General Zaroff gets bored with hunting animals and decides that he can hunt humans that get trapped on his island. When a world renowned hunter gets caught on his island he decides to treat him like a friend instead of prey.
The narrator shows this when Rainsford tries to make a trap from a dead tree. He does this so that he could hurt General Zaroff and make him unable to keep hunting for Rainsford and therefore Rainsford would win the hunt. His trap does not work so well and it only hits General Zaroff's shoulder and gives him a bruise. “The dead tree delicately adjusted to rest on the cut living one, crashed down and struck the general a glancing blow on the shoulder as it fell” (12). Unfortunately the trap that Rainsford makes does not work very well it makes it harder for him to win the hunt because the General has dogs and a gun.
We can infer that while on the yacht, feeding a human being to animals would never have occurred to him, and if it had, that he would have treated it like “grisly...cold-blooded murder.” Revenge also did not seem to be an important aspect to him before becoming the subject of Zaroff's dangerous game, but when he returns and encounters Zaroff in his bedroom, he soon resumes the hunt, this time with Zaroff as the prey. Rainsford compromises his own morals by continuing the game, and he even seems to enjoy killing his new human prey, resting comfortably in Zaroff's “very excellent” bed after killing the general and feeding him to the hounds. Thus, the reader realizes that perhaps Rainsford may have decided that hunting humans is not so “barbaric” after
The Analysis of Postcolonialism Of the main character in the Short Story of the Most Dangerous Game Introduction “The most dangerous game” is a short story written by Richard Connell and first published on January 19th 1924. This story illustrates a hunter whose name is Sanger Rainsford. He plans to hunt jaguar but his journey takes him in the dangerous game designed by Zarroff. This short story is fully appreciated in South America and Africa since the big game-hunting safaris became trendy in the 1920s.
“The Most Dangerous Game” The setting is absolutely necessary for the plot to work in Richard Connell’s “the most dangerous game”. For example the isolation is very important to the plot. The isolation makes the storyline believable. Without it people could run away or get help.
After a long day, it is bedtime for Rainsford, he goes to sleep but is later woken by an animal in the woods, he can hear a pack of hounds getting closer and closer to him. He is panicking about what he is going to do, but all he wants to do is go to bed. “At daybreak Rainsford, lying near the swamp, was awakened by the sound that made him know that he had new things to learn about fear”(22). This indicates man versus self, as he is afraid of what could be lurking in the woods. The author displays hunger, fighting and fear.
There is a strong sense of irony in the short story “The Interlopers” because Nature always seems to take its course, especially when the feuding men turn friends think they are in control of the situation. In an attempt to be saved the men issued, “hunting calls” (Saki online). Typically, a hunting call is in an attempt to lure in animals to be hunted and killed. The two men were successful in luring in animals, however, it is likely these animals will not be helpful for the men to surround themselves with. The ending of the story is an example of irony, “Wolves” (Saki 301).
Therefore rainsford is a better person because he never kills general Zaroff and if he does I would like someone to show me where in the book it states that because it doesn 't. I know I 'm getting repetitive but I can 't stress enough that he never kills general Zaroff. It 's just and inference we make. Rainsford did injure general Zaroff. By using tactics he knows and using his abilities to his advantage and adrenaline from the thought of death. By trapping one if general Zaroff 's dogs that gave him confidence and I think it kind of made general Zaroff scared by seeing what mind games and tricks rainsford can pull off.
Falling under the same umbrella, “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Conell described Rainsford’s situation, “The cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror” (Conell 228). This quote explains that Rainsford, as a hunter, is also forced to participate in a life-or-death game where he is the helpless, targeted animal. Despite the main characters’ role, both of these plots are unusual and out of the ordinary; however, these corresponding plots provided a major resemblance between the two
The setting on the island in “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is essential to the plot. For instance, the island is necessary to the plot because if it is not an island then it would change the story completely. General Zaroff is smart enough to find a secret island to chase and catch his prey. Once they get on the island, they are trapped. Rainsford knew that once General Zaroff is out to get him “ He was in a picture with a frame of water, and his only operations, clearly must take place within that frame” (11).
For instance, in the suspenseful short story by Richard Connell called “The Most Dangerous Game,” the protagonist demonstrates being this when Rainsford is with Whitney, talking about the superstitions surrounding the island. Whitney discusses wanting to hunt in the Amazon and not on the island. Rainsford agrees with his thoughts until he mentions how the jaguar would feel when shot. Scoffing at the man’s opinion, Rainsford counters Whitney’s argument by saying that the animal would not possess any emotion when shot. He continued by saying the world is made up of two groups; the hunted and the hunters.