Sex Offender Management Case Study

Indentifying offenders who are coming in to the community may cause new offenders to be scared to get caught in their actions. They will be afraid of public embarrassment and have a fear of the harsh punishments they might receive. Most incoming potential offenders will be afraid of public embarrassment. New potential offenders would end up knowing that some offenders were already Identified and would try not to make to miss take of getting caught. That is both a good and bad side to this situation.

The Death Penalty The world can be a dark, cruel place to live in , it seems like everyday a horrendous crime is committed like murder, kidnaping and rape. These crimes are enough proof that there is enough evil in the world. It is necessary that society has the death penalty to prevent the possibility of recurrence. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life. The death penalty should be allowed because it is important to show other criminals that it is not okay for their horrendous acts they are committing and that they should be punished for their actions.

Some make up a story to cover up for something else. In which case the victim is proven to be false, the kit should be thrown away, but if the victim is afraid of their offender, then the police should still pursue the case, but place the victim under witness protection. Hopefully by protecting the victims of sexual assault, more will feel it safe to report the crime. In the meantime, more kits should be tested to place the true criminals behind

The criminal justice approach looks at removing the offender from society as a way of protecting the public from potential further victimisation. Incarceration also acts as a deterrent to others, particularly where a more severe sentence is imposed. The situational approach goes on to discuss which security measures are most effective in protecting the home, for example, a burglar alarm in itself can be seen to be ineffective compared to having locks and doors on the windows. It also explains that a suggestion of occupancy deters an offender because of the increased risk. Signs of social cohesion, such as Neighbourhood Watch, also help prevent domestic burglary as it increases the detection rates.

This episode would have made me think criminals are victims of their environment, as the character would not have been on steroids if his father lessened the pressure on him and give him better examples of appropriate behavior. I would have deemed that the criminal justice system has some flaws due to Stabler’s act of wanting to let the accused off for his father. Although this episode only portrayed some criminological theories, it highlighted that there are alternate reasons criminals behave in violent matters. Overall, the episode was interesting, insightful, and clearly depicted criminal activity from a variety of

And quirky punishments designed to go viral don’t just fail to meet this standard of the law; they actively subvert it. Their primary goal is to court publicity, and that publicity can’t be accurately anticipated or controlled” (Beato). The reason Beato says this is because he feels that public humiliation can become cruel and unusual once it is published on the internet and it is a form of bullying for the criminal even if their punishment was for something that wasn’t that

It is possible that society can intervene to reduce or prevent many forms of violence, but insufficient information on what are hate crimes, their effects, why does it affect us and it’s importance. Many communities are not taking the necessary steps to inform and instruct people about these violations, which is why I believe that this would make a great research topic for this class. We can use this opportunity to inform ourselves of what a hate crime entitles and what we can do to stop them. We must all work together to make stop hate crimes, because the lack of knowledge and action against these crimes is leaving groups of people feeling isolated, vulnerable and worthless. In the power-filled words that were proclaimed by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the 1960’s "… we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream" (Martin Luther King Jr. 1963).

Capital punishment is often justified by saying that by executing the murders birth of new murders would be prevented. Executions especially when they are more painful and public create a sense of horror and halts those tempted towards criminality to violate laws. In countries such as Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, Nigeria and New York crime rates are exceptionally high and this affects the population there. The police also works inefficiently in these countries and the criminals easily escape from punishments. Punishments in public especially capital punishment highly controls the crime rate in most of the countries with low crime rate.

Public order crimes are acts considered illegal because they do not conform to society’s general ideas of normal social behavior and moral values (Siegel, 2000). Public order crimes are viewed as harmful to the public good or harmful and disruptive to a community’s daily life (Siegel, 2000). Some public order crimes are considered very serious, others are legal in some places and at sometimes and others are illegal at other times and in other places (Sage, n.d., p. 218). It is thought that allowing or ignoring public order offenses can only lead to more serious crimes it signals the community that nobody cares (Sage, n.d., p. 218). Public order crimes cause great debate.

CCTV seeks to reduce property crimes such as armed robbery, pick pocketing and the breaking into cars by increasing perception among potential offenders (vandals, petty thieves and armed robbers). Thus, in order for the CCTV to be fully effective, the potential offender must be aware of the presence of the camera(s) which increases perceived risk. CCTV prevents property crimes by several means such as the anticipated shaming associated with being caught in the act on camera (Gills, & Spriggs, 2005) and Nosyparker or natural surveillance which encourages other persons to visit these monitored places (Welsh, & Farrington, 2002). Also, the implementation of CCTV allows for effective deployment of security personnel to the correct location of suspicious behaviours (Welsh and Farrington, 2007) by incorporating formal surveillance in which persons are employed to monitor the CCTV (Dekker, 2015). Therefore, the implementation of CCTV in public places prevent property crimes by increasing perceived risk, since it is proposed that less crimes would be committed in areas with an abundance of potential witnesses (Welsh et al,

Imagine what they might think for the society when they get the right to make a decision for the society. Think about the values they might have for the society if they did something wrong, that had a bad affect to the society. If they destroyed our values in the past how do we know of which values they have in mind. Is it for a good cause of the society ar a bad cause to the society? Though, criminals should have second chance in their life to change their bad habits, and be a good influence.

While officers can legally use physical and even deadly force under some circumstances, police have engaged in unjustified shootings, unnecessarily rough treatment, and severe beatings. The increase of police brutality has caused citizens

Researchers must study the effects on human behavior behind EM technology. Although GIS mapping is tries to effectively exclude sex offenders in SRZ, GIS goes beyond its parameters of rehabilitation into no longer punishment, cruel and unusual. GIS serves for example, genocide or (completely excluding a class). A major concern in determining cost efficacy to EM is that offenders need to understand the fees and fines associated with EM is not enough to finance EM costs, for this reason alone EM is not effectively being

I want to emphasize the importance of the job because the core of criminal profiling is removing criminals from society, and keeping the citizens safe from danger. But, on the other hand doing too much work can be detrimental to both the individual and the agency. I would deemphasize working long days to prevent burning out and dissatisfaction in one’s ability to conduct a strong profile. Analytical thinking is also an enormous part of the job, and if one is tired and stressed out from working long days, that can take a toll on the mind. I think criminal profilers must decrease the case loads and work less hours, and assign each person a couple of tasks at a time in order to do the job more

However, the public will deem the search excessive use of force on the accused performed by the RCMP officer. This search would increase public outrage regarding excessive use of police powers as they believe the search could have performed in a less intrusive mean. Furthermore, the “throat hold” should not be performed on anyone especially females as it can result in health complications (Atherley & Hickman, 2014). However, it is necessary to note that the “throat hold” is a common practice used by the RCMP drug squad to prevent drug traffickers from destroying evidence. This practice is not illegal as it is used to prevent the swallowing of drugs that may be in the accused mouth that will aid in substantiating the charge.