The Shareholder and the Director have totally different roles in a limited liability company. Normally a shareholder is the individual who owns the said Company by holding shares whereas the directors have managing powers. In fact, it appears that there is confusion as to the separation of these two positions and as to the distinction of important factors when it comes to corporate governance. This article aims to provide a clear distinction of the roles of both the Shareholder and the Director in a company and demonstrate the fundamental right of a shareholder.
Subject to the provisions stipulated in the Articles of Association of a company and/or to any decision given by the General Meeting, the Board of Directors is empowered to manage
…show more content…
Directors may also exercise their powers over the management of the company even if it means acting against the wishes of the majority of shareholders. The Directors are under a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the Company as a whole whereas, the shareholders exercise their voting rights in accordance to their own interest and benefit. However, in recent years, the Courts recognize the fact that acting with a view to the best interest of the Company, does not necessarily mean that the directors should completely disregard and ignore the interests of employees and creditors who are directly affected by the decisions taken by the Board of Directors representing the Company. An exception to this fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the Company is in the event of the Company’s insolvency, where the interests of the creditors are superior to anybody else and the directors owe a duty to them to ensure that all the affairs of the Company are well …show more content…
Berle Jr. and Gardiner C. Means argued long time ago that Shareholders often are virtually powerless against management. Especially in companies where there are many shareholders, a shareholder may face a situation where his participation interest is not sufficient enough to make control and/or monitoring worthwhile. Thus, Shareholders tend to be rationally apathetic and/or uninterested and they do support the incumbent board on the theory that the Directors are experts and have access to greater information. Indeed, the Shareholders cannot exert direct control over directors while they are in office and they cannot just remove the powers of the Directors. Nevertheless, the Shareholders have a powerful weapon that enforces their protection against the Directors, that is their right and ability to remove or appoint Directors. Such a power is indeed extremely important so as to enable the Shareholders to control the actions of the Board of Directors. Therefore, where a Director does not exercise his power with due competence and/or skill and diligence, in good faith and to the best interests of the Company, the Shareholder has the right to remove him at any time.
It is interesting to note that the distinction should also be made in the roles of Shareholders and Directors where an individual either legal person or physical occupies both roles in a Company. In particular, their roles in the Company should be separated as they entail different rights and responsibilities.
Comcast is a multi-billion company its organization structure is divided into 4 divisions: Corporate Executives, Cable Executives, NBC Universal Executives and Board of Directors. According to my opinion its good decision by the management to divide the company in to different sections or categories. Since this allows the Comcast to be more decentralized and ensures that all division are controlled and coordinated efficiently. This benefits the employees since they can be empowered by having more autonomy to make their own decisions, giving them a sense of importance and making them feel their decision making is vital for the organization. Moreover, decentralized organization is able to make decisions more quickly.
But as a general answer, no. 7) Elaborate on the Crosby statement that no demand is needed in special duty situations because it makes little sense to allow the wrongdoers of the breach of fiduciary duty to be in control of the remedy through a derivative suit: such a situation does not actually remedy anything. Crosby v. Beam is a seminal Supreme Court of Ohio cases that stated majority shareholders in a close corporation owe a heightened fiduciary duty to the minority shareholders of the corporation. Crosby v. Beam, 47 Ohio St. 3d 105, at 108-109.
And a responsibility in the running of it over to the people employed within, what does that responsibility Mean, company ask not that staff do their job, but they can play an active role as an owner and that they can engage with colleagues and work with them in thinking through what will make the business successful. John Lewis shareholder aren’t passive and distant, they have lots of opinions, those opinions are voiced through democratic channels, the chairman and board run the company commercial activities, 82 members partnership council elects nearly half the board and in theory, can sack the chairman and the partnership council itself is largely elected through a network of forums representing every department of every John Lewis, as there is a feeling of equality, you belong to the business, but it belongs to you
The structure determines power, roles and responsibilities of each worker in the business and helps to ensure is able to understand their duty as an employee. It is important for a large company to have an organisational structure as it creates guidance for all employees because they’re able to understand where they stand as an employee and who to go to for any help or queries. Another reasons why they’re important is because it streamlines the companies’ operations and helps identify the different teams that you have
Stakeholders are any individuals affected by a business’s decisions and strategies, therefore, Graeter’s principal stakeholders are its family members and future generations. Other stakeholders that may be affected by the activities of the business are the employees and the broader community. The business is currently owned and operated by fourth generation family members Richard Graeter II (CEO), Robert Graeter (vice president of operations) and Chip Graeter (vice president of retail operations). They are equally responsible for making all the decisions regarding the direction and future of the business (Pride, Hughes & Kapoor 2015, p. 10) Graeter’s decision to forgo short term profits reflects their dedication to product quality and is the
No one role is more important than the other. “Each
OUTLINE FOR DBQ ESSAY: HOW DEMOCRATIC WAS ANDREW JACKSON? I. INTRODUCTION (PARAGRAPH #1) A. Grabber sentence Democratic spirit began B. Background information about Andrew Jackson (use bullets here) Early life/Military Born on the border of North and South Carolina in 1767. He lost both of his parents by his teenage years and married Rachel Donelson.
There should be strong relationship between the two divisions. Employees working in core business or existing products should be equal priority and periodic rewards so that they don’t feel left out. There should be some training programs for the growth of employees. Also there should be periodic assessment programs like the company jam in which opinions of employees from both sides should be taken into consideration.
The first section of this essay focuses on the possible causes of corporate failures, including dominant CEO, poor strategic decisions and the failure of internal control.
The employer holds the right to sue, but not consumers A rising number of companies are including forced arbitration clauses in their contracts. What consumers and job seekers give up when they unknowingly give up their right to sue which is unjust? A Metamorphosis: How Forced Arbitration Arrived In the Workplace (Carmen Comsti, 2012)
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of board size and the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) duality on the value of Canadian manufacturing firms. A sample of 91 Canadian manufacturing firms listed on Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) for a period of 3 years [from 2008-2010] was selected. The co-relational and non-experimental research design was used to conduct this study. The empirical results show that larger board size (large number of directors) has a negative impact on the value of Canadian manufacturing firms.
Disney and its employees are tasked with protective the Disney brand around the world and encouraging the shipping of continuing value. The main aims of Disney’s are satisfying the financial needs of the shareholders. However, Disney goes beyond satisfying for shareholder needs and locations a strong emphasis on moral conduct that affects each households and the environment. The moral standards at Disney do not just apply to the employees, but it also on the Board of Directors. Disney’s “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors” governs the actions of the Disney board, holds them to high moral standards and makes them accountable for actions taken on behalf of the company.
Mergers and Acquisitions and Shareholder Wealth: The theory of finance states that maximization of shareholder wealth should be the goal of every business organization. It is not clear, however, whether maximization of shareholder wealth is the main motivation behind Mergers and acquisitions. This has generated a lot of research interest the area. Unfortunately decades of intensive research have not been able to conclusively establish the impact of Mergers and acquisitions on shareholder wealth.
At Lockheed Martin, shareholders represent a significant portion of this demographic. They are anyone who owns Lockheed’s stock and is impacted by its performance; positively when the stock rises and negatively in times of poor performance. Lockheed is concerned about its shareholders because they are entitled to earning profits from its stock as investors and owners of the company. If shareholders become dissatisfied they can change how the company is run; for example, they can replace the existing board of directors through a voting process. Consequently, Lockheed Martin’s decisions are focused on generating profit for their shareholders to increase stock valuation.
A system to check and balances the benefit of all the board of directors and to avoid some of top management from making decisions that only benefit themselves is created and named corporate governance. Corporate governance means the system of rules, practices and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. The set of rules provided as a guidelines for the board of directors to make sure that accountability and fairness in a company’s relationship with its stakeholders such as financiers, customers, management, employees, shareholders and also society in order to achieve company’s goals and targets in a manner that add a value to the company. All of the stakeholders play an important role in corporate governance to ensure that