A little boy named Jake is coloring in his class. Jake has five crayons because he ran the fastest to the boxes, but the little boy sitting next to him has no crayons because he was too slow to get any. The teacher has run out of crayons, so she asks Jake to share two of his crayons with the boy sitting next to him, so that he could color too. Jake doesn't want to share, because he wants all the colors for himself. The teacher has to intervene and explain to Jake why sharing is good, and take two of his crayons and give them to the boy next to him. This scenario is relatable to the story of Robin Hood, a man who takes from the advantaged, and gives to the disadvantaged. Some would argue that what Robin Hood does is bad, and some would argue that it is good. This leaves a pondering question, is Robin Hood a good person doing bad things, or a bad person doing good things. …show more content…
Robin Hood would ask people how much money they had on them, if they told the truth no harm would come to them, if they were poor Robin Hood would help them, but if they lied Robin Hood and his band would take everything they had, and give it to someone in need. They were considered heroic outlaws, because while breaking the law they were also doing something good. Robin Hood defending the poor against oppression. If you had nothing, you wouldn’t fear him, but if you were wealthy and corrupt, you wanted him dead. This looks into perspective, the rich hate him and the poor love him. Outside of the story of Robin Hood, you could look at how people view the government. It is often that those with lots of money, dislike the government for taxing them, but for those with little money, they love the government for helping
This short story is kind of similar to the modern day problems. Many people say they want equality but fail to realize that everyone having equality is not always the best choice. When it comes to equality, either everyone is poor or everyone is rich. The really is no in
When people hear the name “Al Capone”, they usually don’t associate it with a hero. However, various acts carried out by the 1930’s mobster, such as opening soup kitchens for the poor, led some to call him a modern day Robin Hood. This being said, Al’s violent and illegal ways cannot be ignored, making Al Capone a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a person or character who has positive intentions, yet has a tragic flaw that ultimately leads to their downfall. Although Al Capone was born in rough conditions, and grew into the notorious mobster that he was, he also should be remembered for all of the good that he did for the world.
As W.H. Auden said “Those to whom evil is done/ Do evil in return” (Auden “September” 21-22). Similarly to Auden’s work on the effects of dictators, Charles Dickens’ Tale of Two Cities, shows the effects of one class having excessive wealth or power above another. Throughout the novel, Dickens demonstrates that when one estate has the excess power, they feel obligated to treat others inhumanely, as if they are irrelevant. However, when treated with the utmost disrespect, people will feel obliged not to change the system justly, but to change it in benefit for their personal revenge. Dickens shows his concern in any government in which one body has excessive power over another by sympathizing with the victims of the oppression.
Going from rags to riches makes someone a role model to others, to show how life can be improved through any situation. Andrew took money from good people, he only gave to other wealthy associations, and contributed mainly to his own company. A hero performs acts to help the community, discreetly or anonymously; Andrew Carnegie did
The issue surrounding the wealthy class and their abundance of money is one that has been prominent for a long time. For many, the seemingly endless fortune these elite class people sit on has been deemed to be unfair and unnecessary, especially when there are people around the world who are not making enough money to obtain basic necessities. Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics, believes that the solution to this monetary problem is for the wealthy to simply donate money they don’t use on basic necessities back to the people in need. Although giving back to the less fortunate could potentially help in fixing many problems, prosperous people should not be obligated to donate money they “don’t need” to various organizations because since
In one circumstance, we may feel the need to give to those who are poor to keep them from getting in our personal space; and in other circumstances we feel that we give to others out of the kindness of our heart. I completely agree with Ascher and her views on compassion, because I have been in similar situation where I have questioned why people give money, and whether they give with a whole heart or out of necessity. Furthermore, this essay can teach us plenty of lessons that can be utilized throughout our lives so we can teach others and make them aware of the need to be more
Even the good people can be selfish too. The bad people are doing bad things, but the good people are too selfish to even help. In the story “The Diary of Anne Frank” the family has been hiding from the Germans for a long time. They have little food and little amounts of everything. Mrs.Frank catches one of the VaanDaans stealing.
Some even make generous philanthropies to the people who are less fortunate. Although it is good to be a “Captain of Industry”, Rockefeller and Walton were both degrading “Robber Barons”. From this moment forward
In this case “former Detroit Lion Luther Elliss was frequently involved in charity events and invested heavily in local businesses. For his relatives, Elliss paid for things like landscaping and a wedding.” as this was out of the kindness of his heart it also ended up coming to backfire on him. But also he is one of the very few that began to start changing his life around he went back to school and also is helping coach a high school football team. As its nice to hand out and help family and friends it's
People are often think of themselves and base their actions on what would harbor the best outcomes for them. It is rare in which people would go out of their way to help other even when it won’t harm them to do so. Therefore, it goes to show, based on that pattern, that the
The book "To Kill a Mockingbird" describes different classes of people as been rich and poor. People classify themselves differently because some people are in poverty, while some are wealthy. Most wealthy people help the poor, but the main people they help are the Cunningham 's family. They help the Cunningham 's family because they are willing to work and they are hard working. People never help the Ewell 's family because they are rude, lazy, and they waste their money on alcohol.
Compassion and good intentions can often lead to the cruelest, harshest actions. Despite this, people still strive to do what is best for others and be selfless, even if it means making a decision that nobody wants to
We can not measure how good or bad someone 's actions are. This means that we can not judge if someone is good or evil. Is giving food to the homeless just as good as saying please and thank you? Since we are unable to measure how good an action is we are also unable to measure if the good actions someone has done outweighs the bad actions someone has done. An example of this is Robin Hood.
Oppression has always been prevalent throughout history, and as a response to this, the exploited often revolt, in turn, causing inciteful change. However, when the revolution only seeks revenge, it fosters more violence and creates a more oppressed society. The French Revolution while successful in the sense that it overthrew the government, has one dangerous aspect in common with oppression: violence. This revolution is depicted in A Tale of Two Cities by Dickens, where the persecuted peasants of France start a rebellion to try and achieve revenge government. However, by using violence as the primary method to abolish the government and boasting about the dominance of the revolution through the Carmagnole, the revolutionaries discredit themselves.
The money the aged man gave to Bob could have been used to help someone who was actually sick or someone in desperate need of the money for ethical reasons. Although it may be true that the elderly man may have been slightly irresponsible by being naive and giving away the money without ensuring that what Bob was saying was genuine, in spite of that, his deeds were noble and recommendable; whereas Bob’s actions was dishonest and unethical. Ultimately, Bob was wrong in his actions because he did a terrible thing to a very good