Sheila's Role In An Inspector Calls

1444 Words6 Pages

What role does Sheila play in “An Inspector Calls’? Priestley’s play centred around morality is set in 1912 and explores themes of socialism, capitalism and responsibility. The character of Sheila is feasibly one of the most important in conveying the play's message of collective responsibility as a society. A young woman and daughter to the Berling family, Sheila is upper-middle-class and engaged to business owner Gerald Croft. The character of Sheila is complex, with many warring notions and ideas: the exposition drops hints of a budding left-wing ideology, which identifies that ideas such as progress, equality and rights are what compose the demeanour of a socialist. Throughout this play, we see Sheila outgrow her family’s rigid views -whilst …show more content…

Despite her age, Sheila is handled by society with the competence of a child. With very few responsibilities and little to no authority over her life, someone (either her family, the Berlings or Gerald) is constantly controlling her. This treatment of women in the 1910s was unfortunately very common and household work and minding children fell onto their shoulders. Women of this time could not live a comfortable life alone without a man providing an income, they had no right to vote, essentially belonged to their husbands, and were generally only employed in low-wage menial jobs. Despite Sheila and Eva Smith being of like age, the Birling’s juxtaposed idea of Eva Smith being able to provide for herself, whilst Sheila is expected to be provided for by her husband or family, highlights the different expectations women are held to from different social classes. Yet despite the Birling's idea of Eva’s being responsible for herself, in the playwright, Priestley frequently references her as a“girl”. Despite both Eva and Sheila being called girls, the stark differences …show more content…

Reflecting on her newfound socialist ideology, and the Inspectors departing speech, Sheila parrots his final words, reciting they will be the cause of “fire and blood and anguish” and expressing her opinion to her parents “it frightens me the way you talk”. The choice of the verb frighten demonstrates that she is afraid of her parents and anxious about their constant turning of a blind eye towards their harmful actions. Sheila persists in her argument, scorning her parents “So there’s nothing to be sorry for, nothing to learn.” the repetition of “Nothing” emphasises that no progress has been made in changing the family’s capitalistic views of every man for themselves. Consequently, their actions have impacted others in ways they couldn’t fathom and ultimately pushed a young woman to suicide. Sheila urges her parents to open their narrow minds and take responsibility for their actions. Priestley uses Sheila as the body for his socialist message of how everyone should look out for each

Open Document