Sherwood V Walker Smith Co Summary
There is a famous American case involving the sale of a cow called "Sherwood v. Walker-Smith Co." This case, also known as the "Case of the Red Cow," took place in 1887 in Michigan. It is indeed considered a landmark contract law case. In Sherwood v. Walker-Smith Co., the plaintiff, Mary Sherwood, purchased a cow from the defendant, Walker-Smith Co., for $80. Both parties believed the cow to be barren (infertile). However, shortly after the sale, it was discovered that the cow was actually pregnant and worth significantly more than the purchase price (Admin & Admin, 2020). Sherwood wanted to keep the cow and demanded the fulfillment of the contract at the agreed price, while Walker-Smith Co. argued that there was a mutual mistake about the …show more content…
The court held that the mutual mistake about the cow's fertility did not make the contract void, as it was an essential term of the agreement. The court stated that the contract was binding and enforceable because the parties had agreed to take the risk of the cow's condition, even if mistaken (Admin & Admin, 2020). The decision in Sherwood v. Walker-Smith Co. had a significant impact on contract law by establishing the principle that a mutual mistake of fact, even if material, does not necessarily make a contract voidable. Instead, the court emphasized that the parties' intentions, as expressed in the contract, should be respected (Admin & Admin, …show more content…
In 1887, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the lower court's ruling, affirming that the contract was voidable due to the mutual mistake regarding the cow's condition. The Court held that the parties were not bound by the contract because their agreement was based on a shared mistake of fact, which significantly affected the essence of the agreement. Sherwood v. Walker is significant in contract law for establishing the principle that a mutual mistake of material fact can render a contract voidable. It emphasized the importance of the parties' shared understanding and knowledge of the subject matter of the contract. The case remains influential in contract law jurisprudence, particularly in the context of mutual mistake and the impact on contractual enforceability (Kentlaw,
Husky International Electronics Inc. Vs. Daniel Lee Ritz Case Summary
700 Words | 3 PagesThe Fifth Circuit Court did not determine whether Ritz was indeed liable to Chrysalis’ debt, but did affirm he did commit “actual fraud”. Husky argued that the transfers were recognizable fraud to which the Court disagreed, stating the main element in “actual fraud” requires a misrepresentation of the debtor to the creditor when applying and is not determined to be actions taken after such credit is granted. The Fifth Circuit found Ritz did make false representations and reversed the findings of the District Court by finding that the phrase “actual fraud” includes all fraudulent conveyance schemes, including those that do not involve false representation and remanded the case to further
Sucklal Case Summary
156 Words | 1 PagesDid the circuit court err in finding ratifying the foreclosure sale pursuant to Md. Rule 14-305.
Dorothy J. Drury Case Brief
404 Words | 2 PagesOn appeal, ALC argued that the agreement bound Drury because his mother was a third-party beneficiary of
Austin Trial Court Case Summary
160 Words | 1 PagesFollowing a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Larry Offutt (“Offutt”), appellant, was convicted of robbery with a dangerous weapon, attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon, and related charges. On appeal, Austin presents three questions for our review, which we have rephrased as follows: 1. Whether the trial court erred by limiting cross-examination of a state’s witness regarding her involvement in an unrelated offense. 2. Whether the trial court erred in overruling an objection to the prosecutor’s statements on the grounds that the statements impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.
Summary Of Lindsay G. Robertson's Conquest By Law
1879 Words | 8 PagesA victory for the plaintiff would have erased the government's Proclamation-based claim to the land and the right to sell it, thus upholding Murray's 1773 purchase. As reviewer Ellen Pearson notes, Robertson's research proves that the case was a complete forgery: "Johnson was a collusive case... the [company] tried to take advantage of an early national court system still in its formative stages and, therefore, subject to considerable manipulation by attorneys who sought to turn the system to their clients' advantage." Robertson¬—in uncovering how Harper handpicked the plaintiff, defendant, and the attorneys on both sides— "amply proves the collusion," according to
People V Smith Case Summary
769 Words | 4 PagesThe case People v. Smith was finally decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan in 1991. The case involved the defendant Ricky Franklin Smith whom pled guilty to breaking and entering and of being a habitual offender, fourth offense (People v Smith, 1991). The judge sentenced Smith to 6 to 30 years imprisonment for the Habitual Offender charge. Ricky Franklin Smith after sentencing requested to be resentenced because his juvenile record, which had been expunged, was considered by the judge for sentencing. The Michigan Court of Appeals agreed with the sentencing; however, when the case went to the Supreme Court of Michigan, they reversed the decision because the sentencing should not have been based on the defendant’s prior expunged juvenile record.
Roper V. Simmons Case Of 2005
827 Words | 4 PagesIntroduction In response to question one of unit 4, I will discuss the facts, issues, as well as court holdings referencing the Roper v. Simmons case of 2005. Discussion The Roper v. Simmons case is noted for being one of the most significant cases in the history of the juvenile court system as it abolished capital punishment for offenders under the age of eighteen in the United States (Death Penalty Information Center, n.d.). This case was argued on October 13, 2004, and a decision was reached by the United States Supreme Court on March 1, 2005. The case referenced the sentencing of Christopher Simmons to death for a crime he committed at the age of seventeen (Cornell University Law School, n.d.).
Supreme Court Cases: Dredd Scott Vs. The Board Of Education
770 Words | 4 PagesIn 1857 there was a court case between a slave(Dredd Scott) and the Supreme Court. This court case was Dredd Scott v. Sanford. This case was the beginning of many cases similar to it for example the Plessy v. Ferguson case or the Brown v. The Board of Education. In other words, all of these cases involved African Americans and their rights as Americans. During the duration of this case the slave Dredd Scott emphasizes, "that he was owned as a slave in a free territory,"(Dredd Scott v. Sanford).
Summary Of South Carolina Vs Gathers
950 Words | 4 PagesIn Payne v. Tennessee (1991), the Supreme Court stated that the state made a mistake in their interpretation of Booth, and, as a result, misapplied the ruling of the Supreme Court to their case. They further stated, “In the majority of cases, and in this case, victim impact evidence serves entirely legitimate purposes. In the event that evidence is introduced that is so unduly prejudicial that it renders the trial fundamentally unfair, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides a mechanism for
Summary Of Clements V State
1178 Words | 5 PagesOverview of Clements v. State The case of Clements v. State is an example of how the legal framework of stalking laws in Texas should be interpreted and the effectiveness of this law to ensure justice for the victims. The case depicts how the law should operate despite certain vagueness in aspects of the First Amendment. The decision of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas to uphold the conviction while disagreeing with some conclusions arrived at by the trial court proves that stalkers will not be allowed to slide through cracks in the legal system. The case, based on a sequence of events where the complainant, Jennifer Clements, was subject to psychological trauma accompanied by an imminent physical threat to her from Nathan Clement, her estranged husband, is a forthright condition of stalking which complies with the Statues of
Defendant's 46-Month Sentence
1085 Words | 5 PagesFed. R. Crim. P. 52(a). Similarly, in Mathenia, the 11th District held that “a non-constitutional error is harmless if, viewing the proceedings in their entirety, a court determines that the error did not affect the sentence, or had but very slight effect. If one can say with fair assurance that the sentence was not substantially swayed by the error, the sentence is due to be affirmed even though there was error.” United States v. Mathenia, 409 F.3d 1289, 1290 (11th
Dred Scott Vs. Sanford: Supreme Court Case
907 Words | 4 Pages" Dred Scott v. Sandford." 60 U.S 393. Supreme Court of the United States. 1957.
Gratwick V. Johnson Case Analysis
1665 Words | 7 PagesIn 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.
Copyright Law: Vanilla Ice Vs. David Bowie/Freddie Mercury
2068 Words | 9 PagesThe court argued that Koon could have made the same statement without imitating Roger’s work. Koon had to pay compensation to Rodgers. CAN OR CANNOT PROTECT WORK AND
Ethics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital
503 Words | 3 PagesAt the end of this case, the court had this to
More about Sherwood V Walker Smith Co Summary
Husky International Electronics Inc. Vs. Daniel Lee Ritz Case Summary
700 Words | 3 PagesSucklal Case Summary
156 Words | 1 PagesDorothy J. Drury Case Brief
404 Words | 2 PagesAustin Trial Court Case Summary
160 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of Lindsay G. Robertson's Conquest By Law
1879 Words | 8 PagesPeople V Smith Case Summary
769 Words | 4 PagesRoper V. Simmons Case Of 2005
827 Words | 4 PagesSupreme Court Cases: Dredd Scott Vs. The Board Of Education
770 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of South Carolina Vs Gathers
950 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Clements V State
1178 Words | 5 PagesDefendant's 46-Month Sentence
1085 Words | 5 PagesDred Scott Vs. Sanford: Supreme Court Case
907 Words | 4 PagesGratwick V. Johnson Case Analysis
1665 Words | 7 PagesCopyright Law: Vanilla Ice Vs. David Bowie/Freddie Mercury
2068 Words | 9 PagesEthics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital
503 Words | 3 Pages