In 1993 17 year old Christopher Simmons and two friends, John Tessmer and Charles Benjamin had planned to murder Shirley Crook. Then night of the murder one of the men , John Tessmer dropped out but Simmons and Benjamin carried out the plot. Around 2 am the men broke into Crook’s house through a window and committed robbery. Later, the two men entered Crook’s home and tied up the victim and covered her head. The suspects drove Crook to a nearby State park and threw her body into the Meramec river. Shirley Crooks husband, Steven Crook arrived at the house on September 9th and reported his wife missing. The same day the Steven Crook reported his wife missing a man fishing on the Meramec river had found the dead body of the victim. The day following the discovery of Shirley Crooks body the police had learned of Simmons bragging about the killing. The police then went to the high school that simmons attended and arrested him. The police had arrested Simmons and wanted to ask him some questions, Simmons agreed to cooperate with police and answer some questions. It would not be long before Simmons confessed about the murder of Shirley Crook. The case was then brought to trial in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Missouri with loads of evidence against Simmons. When the case opened at the Circuit Court of …show more content…
Virginia Supreme Court case (2002) was a pivotal case when deciding Roper v Simmons three years later. Daryl Renard Atkins abducted, robbed, and then killed a Airman near Langley Air Force Base in Virginia. During the hearing Atkins was sentenced to death, but that decision was questioned because of Atkins being “mentally retarded”. Atkins mental state brought up the question of whether or not it is fair to execute an individual with a mental disorder, thus bringing into question the eighth amendment. The court ruled in a 6-3 vote that the execution of a mentally retarded person does fall as “cruel and unusual punishment” under the eighth
This is an analysis of the newspaper article on the appeal of the murder conviction of Mr. Gordon Wood. Mr. Wood was originally charged with the 1995 murder of Ms. Caroline Byrne and the trial was held in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in July 2006. During the court case it was stated that Mr. Wood had “hurled his model girlfriend off The Gap in Sydney in a spear throw that lobbed her so severely into a crevice, that a rescue team had to use force to free her body” (Sydney Morning Herald, 2007). Mr. Wood pleaded not guilty to all charges, however the jury found him guilty of her murder. The murder case was taken to State level due to the seriousness of the crime.
On a cool day in Salt Lake City Utah, Gary "Green River Killer" Ridgway was born. July 7th 1982 was a day that would start the change of history in forensic science, this was the day waitress Amina Agisheff would leave for work and never be found alive again. This event started a killing spree that stretched potentially 19 grueling years. The very next day Ridgway kills Wendy Coffield a runaway teen. About one month later Debra Estes reported a man in a blue and white pickup truck who offered the girl a lift but then brandished a pistol and forced her to pleasure him sexually.
Parties: Charles Katz(Plaintiff) v. United States (Defendant) Facts: The Plaintiff Charles Katz was convicted of transmitting wagering information across state lines using a public telephone which is a violation of 18 U.S.C. &1084. He was being observed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI) from February 19 to February 25, 1965 at set hours every day using the phone. After being suspicious the FBI placed listening devices on the telephone booth so they could record his calls.
Shirley Kinge was a 54 year old mother who was accused of helping her son burn down a house. In the house, a couple and their two children were found with pillowcases on their heads with gunshots to the back of their heads. Her son Michael Kinge killed the family and then set the house on fire. There was a tip that he was the one who committed the crime and when the police showed up to arrest him, he proceeded into firing at the cops. He was killed in the gunfire.
In the state of Maryland on July 29th, 1986 Kirk Noble Bloodsworth was brought to trial. The crimes that were said to be committed were; first degree murder, first degree rape, and first degree sexual offense. The defendants in the case were the following; Julia Doyle Bernhardt and George E. Burns, Jr., Asst. Public Defenders (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Valerie V. Cloutier, Asst.
There was a killing in texas that left three people dead. On December 2014 the jury said that Eric Williams was the killer for these people and he should die for the killing of these people. Cynthia Mclellend and her husband Mike Mclellend were shot to death in there home close to a suburb east of Dallas and mark hasse death but hasn’t been to trial. Authorites said that Eric Williams had stole some computer equipment and he was very upset cause that coast him his law license and job. The court has now found evidence on Eric Williams and said that he killed the people in two different incidents and Eric wife Kim testified and said she drove the getaway car and help him destroy the weapons.
Roper v. Simmons was a Supreme Court case that occurred in 2004. The case was deciding whether or not minors over the age of fifteen were allowed to be sentenced to death. Christopher Simmons was given the death sentence at seventeen years old. He felt that he should not have been given the death penalty because he was not yet an adult. Simmons said that this was violating his Eighth Amendment rights.
In Missouri of 1993, Christopher Simmons at the age of 17, along with two of his friends devised a plan to murder Shirley Crook. The night of, one of the boys opted out of the plan. Despite being down a person, Christopher Simmons and his remaining friend pursued the execution of their plan to break in and murder the woman. They restrained her in duct tape, drove to a nearby bridge, and threw her into the river below. Simmons would eventually confess to law enforcement of his actions even going as far as submitting a videotaped reenactment of the murder he committed.
The defendant, Mary Maloney, a seemingly happily married pregnant woman has killed her devoted and loving husband, Patrick Maloney. Mary Maloney had just received news from Patrick, she had taken the news wrong and quickly turned violent. She did not hesitate to then murder her husband. The Prosecution is charging Mary Maloney with Voluntary Manslaughter and Tampering with Physical Evidence. Mary Maloney may look innocent at first glance but she was capable of committing these horrendous acts without remorse.
They ruled this because it was deemed as “ Cruel and Unusual Punishment” and was a violation of the eighth
In Roper v. Simmons there are two issues that must be addressed, the first being the issue of moral maturity and culpability. The defense in the trial phase of this case argued that Mr. Simmons was an at an age where he was not responsible enough to fully understand the effects and consequences of his actions. The majority draws on Atkins v. Virginia to argue that this specific precedent supports their case that the death penalty should not be imposed on the mentally immature or impaired. However, an important point to be made is that the Atkins v. Virginia decision is geared towards the clinical definition of mental retardation: significant limitations that limit adaptive skills. Also, another important question to consider is the competency and premeditation of Mr. Simmons’ crime in this case.
Christopher Simmons, 17 at the time, was condemned to death in 1993 for murder. He exhausted all of his state and federal appeals up until 2002, meaning they were all rejected. In 2002, the Missouri Supreme Court granted Simmons a stay of execution while the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Atkins v. Virginia, a case that was held on the execution of the mentally disabled. “When the Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia in 2002 (barring executions for the mentally disabled), Simmons filed a new petition. He argued that the Eighth Amendment rationale of Atkins should also bar the execution of juveniles” (Legal Dictionary, n.d.).
On Sunday, November 13, 1842 a double murder occurred at Smith Farm in Old Fields, Long Island. The victims, Alexander Smith and and Rebecca Smith, were a wealthy, well- respected married couple who ran Smith farm. George Weeks, the Smiths farmhand, was reporting for work the monday after the murder and heard the dog barking from the work-shed by the Smiths house. George Weeks then became suspicious since the dog was usually inside with Mr. Smith. George then looked in the house and saw that the east room window was broken and Mr. and Mrs. Smith were lying on the floor covered in blood.
One day Karla Brown´s body was found by her fiancé Mark Fair and his friend in their newly bought house. She was found on her knees, bent forward and her head was in a dreamlike barrel filled with water. Karla was only wearing a sweater she only use to wear during winter and hear hands were tied behind her back. The Wood River Police Department went to the crime scene, but they had technical problems.
After the proceedings in Simmons case had run their course, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Atkins v. Virginia that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit the execution of a mentally retarded person. Simmons filed a petition for state postconviction relief, arguing that the reasoning of Atkins established that the Constitution prohibits the execution of a juvenile who was under 18 when the crime was committed. The Missouri Supreme Court agreed and set aside Simmons’ death sentence and resentenced him to life without the possibility of parole. On March 1, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court decided