To begin, the influences of each character lead to the creation of their own values and beliefs. It is evident, that the background of which each protagonist bases their values off of, are completely different. In Shooting An Elephant, he is a police officer which in this society makes him an obvious target; due to him being in an alliance with the British. He explains that, “the insults hooted after me got on my nerves” and this is a factor for the silence of his voice (Orwell). Orwell develops a character, that struggles with controlling his beliefs since he is a member of the minority in Moulmein. In addition, he fights with his inner thoughts because he knows that he is “young and ill-educated” but he continues to lock up innocent people …show more content…
Some people have the ability to stay true to themselves like Vicente but others including the officer, give into the pressure and please others. One recognizes that the officer has “no intention to shoot the elephant [he will only] defend [himself] if necessary” (Orwell). The shift occurs when the crowd of natives follow him and he feels obligated to shoot. He strikes the elephant even though it goes against his beliefs. At this point Orwell develops a character with the mindset that pleasing others comes before pleasing oneself. He no longer controls his values if anything he falls short of them. The opposite of this occurs with Vicente’s decisions. Of what little he owns, his amphora is his pride. Once it shatters into the earth, he sets out for another one in hope of becoming happier. Even though the last one has been found, “the search itself is important, only the search” (Wuorio). Nor the ocean’s weather condition or others weary judgments on his actions get in the way of Vicente’s values. He executes his decision to benefit himself and not others. It is evident that, others have the ability to pressure one into changing their values. An exception is when one does not possess the urge to please
Carol Tuttle once said “Rebellion is a sign of a child fighting to be seen as who they are”. This idea of rebellion as a way to bring attention to one’s identity can be seen in the two texts “El Olvido” by Judith Ortiz Cofer and “Life in the Age of the Mimis ” by Domingo Martinez. The authors of these texts exhibit the idea that try to forget one’s identity can cause you to suffer. Have you ever wondered what wondered what would happen if you tried to rebel against your roots and forget who you truly are? In the poem “El Olvido” by Judith Ortiz Cofer.
The overhaul of his grammar and vocabulary proved an impediment to sharing his newfound beliefs with his parents having a deficit of schooling. He lost his former accent and style, soon coming to a realization that he was becoming much different than his parents and his past self. The persona he had left behind was one of passion and spontaneity, this he forfeited for the critical, reflective, and self-evaluative, person shown through his writing. Even though he may have lost himself through his journey in the educational system, Rodriguez worked past what his station in life could have easily become. While reading this essay he may paint the portrait of a meek individual, working so hard for fear he would end up like his beloved but not idolized parents.
Zachary Conners SUNY – Eng. 12 Mrs. O’Malley December 15, 2014 “Shooting an Elephant” is a persuasive rhetorical piece written by George Orwell used to describe Orwell’s feelings about imperialism. Orwell uses pathos, logos, and ethos to convey his feelings towards imperialism and how destructive it can be. Born 1903, George Orwell, novelist, essayist, and critic, was best known for his novels Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty- Four. Son of a British servant, Orwell spent most of his days in India, where his father had been stationed.
Even though Orwell did commit the crime of shooting an elephant, throughout the story he used ethos, pathos, and figurative language to convince the audience if given the opportunity he would never shoot an elephant again because the elephant represents the innocence of people. First and foremost, Orwell establishes his ethos. As stated in Everything’s an Argument, ethos is described as the author's credibility. He establishes his ethos right from the beginning of the story when he states he works for the British but he despises them.
Rhetorical Analysis: “Shooting an Elephant” Contrary to popular belief, the oppressors of imperialism lack freedom. Imperialists are usually powerful and maintain control over the native people of the land they are taking over. It is expected for someone with great power to have choices and freedoms, however, that is not necessarily the case. Sometimes power can limit or restrict the choices one makes.
The novel “Animal Farm” Written by George Orwell and the film “The Truman show” directed by Peter Weir are very different but they also share many of the same views. This essay will talk about the “good life”, a “good society” and “power and control”, It will also talk about the differences and similarities between the two texts. “Animal Farm” is about a group of animals that live on a farm that team up and take the farm away from the humans, all is good until three pigs change all of the rules on the other animals without telling them why and how. “The Truman Show” is about a young man named Truman Burbank who discovers that his whole town is strange and feels like they are up to something he soon finds out that they are all in a massive tv show and that he is the main character... So he tries to escape.
Well known author and journalist, George Orwell, in his essay, Shooting an Elephant, describes his experiences as a Policeman in Moulmein, Burma during European Imperialism. Orwell’s purpose is to convey the ideal that what is right and what is accepted don’t always align. He adopts a remorseful tone in order to convey to the reader the weight of his actions. By looking at George Orwell’s use of imagery and figurative language, one can see his strongly conflicting opinions on Imperialism. Orwell begins his essay, Shooting an Elephant, by explaining the actions of the Burmese people and by expressing his contempt for imperialism.
It takes time, experiences and lessons until the concept can be grasped. Although it is a simple “who are you?” question, the answer is not given until one can meet their fullest potential and then have it handed to them. Antonio Marez is brought into the novel as the protagonist who seems to have trouble with obtaining the answers he is in search for, concerning his destined future as well his beliefs. Although his parents did not seem to realize it, their conflicting views made it difficult for him to accept either of their frequently expressed belief systems.
This narrative piece is an effective expository technique that describes the narrator’s thoughts and tone. Orwell uses oxymoron such as “grinning corpse” and paradox phrases such as “the story always sounds clear enough at a distance, but the nearer you get to the scene of events the vaguer it becomes”. Another paradox statement is shown in “I perceived this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys”. Orwell’s decisions were briskly altered as he was deciding on whether to kill the elephant or not. His mind altered from “I ought not to shoot him” to “I had got to do it” and also to “But I did not want to shoot the elephant”.
In the short story “Shooting an Elephant'' George Orwell writes about his experience of conflict between what he believed was right vs. what he did because of others. In the story, Orwell was put in the position to kill an elephant everyone believed was a threat. Orwell thought the opposite of the others saying for himself: “I did not in the least want to shoot him” (Orwell). In his heart, he did not want to kill the elephant but he had to decide which action to go through since everyone else believed it was right to kill the elephant.
Hannah Edmiston Boudreau AP Language Friday 25 September, 2015 Shooting an Elephant Analyzing Rhetorical Devices Shooting an Elephant, written by George Orwell in 1936, describes his experience working as a British officer located in Moulmein, Burma. He writes his essay to reveal the cruelty and disastrous outcome of imperialism he witnesses. Orwell uses strong resource of language such as symbolism, metaphors and imagery to express his disdain for British imperialism. Orwell uses symbolism to connect the character of the elephant to the effects of imperialism.
To support this Orwell tells of the hardship he faces as being not only a white man in an Indian society, but a cop as well, to help convince the audience that imperialism needs to end before it leads to many country’s demise, including his own. Orwell did not just give a general description of what happened he made it so the reader could feel what he felt, see what he saw, and experience what he experienced. Way of the ways is through his graphic imagery of the story, including the moments after he shot the elephant, “his legs collapsed beneath him…” describing the pain and suffering the elephant went through as he took each shot; this strong imagery strengthens the emotions of anger and sadness in the reader to better his argument against
Throughout “Shooting An Elephant” , Orwell’s narrative style brings out internal and external conflicts that are relatable in society today. The narrator faces multiple internal and external conflicts. One external conflict being the Burmese and how they mock him because he is a representative of the British Empire, but he will do what it takes to show them he is not a fool. "I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool.
In George Orwell 's short story titled “Shooting an Elephant” presented an event that changed a countries civilization. George’s life in Burma, and the prejudice placed by the people he oppressed inspired his writing through the uses of setting, style, and theme. In George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell no specific event influenced this piece rather it was an accumulation of many small events of prejudice and hate by an opposing group of
Where a police officer has every right to shoot an elephant who killed a man, but morally has conflict against doing so. There are three main themes or messages in this story, those are peer pressure, morality and action. First of all, this story has a lot of moral conflict. The story is about a man who is a police officer in Burma, and already he sees how much he is hated by the local people. The main moral choice comes when he is holding the elephant gun and is about to shoot and kill the elephant.