In the short story, “Eco defense” it discusses how people should have the right to defend their homes, and how their nature is being threatened. The author presents nature as wilderness, and he refers it to it being our primordial homeland of all living creatures. The importance of the place within in the piece is the American wilderness. The characters are not treating nature right because they are invading our nature .The author doesn’t agree with the characters for what they are doing, and he feels if nature is being threatened with invasion then we have the right to defend our nature which is our home. The author did not change with his interaction with nature because he still had the passion to protect the wilderness. “Eco- defense
John Muir, a naturalist and preservation pioneer of nature took an ethical stand for land ethics when he shared his thoughts that all living things are equally important parts of the land, and animals and plants have as much right to live and survive as people do. In the 1600’s when Europeans began to settle in North America, there were 1037 million acres of forestland. Today, a little over 700 million acres in the United States is forestland—only thanks to preservation laws. In the 1800’s, that number of tress and forests decreased tremendously because expansion and progression recklessly exploited natural resources by clear-cutting forest to use wood for fuel and building supplies.
In the beginning of the story, the author views nature and civilization as separate things that should continue to be separate as Owens states on page 244 and 245 “It was part of a Forest Service plan to remove all human-made objects from the wilderness area, a plan of which I heartily approved.” This quote shows that the author thinks that human-made objects, or civilization, should be separate from the wilderness area which is nature. The author also shows the viewpoint that civilization and nature are separate on page 245 where he states “At the end of those five days, not a trace of the shelter remained, and I felt good, very smug in fact, about returning the White Pass
Jimmy Carter and Environmental Conservation In former President Jimmy Carter's account of his visit to the far north Arctic Refuge in "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land," he recalls the unbelievable beauty of the wildlife and nature in the area, calling on conservationists, as well as those whose intentions for the land may permanently damage the wilderness of the region, to consider the effects of construction, industrialization, and oil-drilling in such a rare and environmentally precious area. Carter uses his personal experience in the Arctic Refuge as well as his knowledge of conservationist and environmental affairs as President to establish credibility, along with vivid diction and tone elements to further strengthen his argument against industrial development in an area of the world that should be kept sacred. Carter establishes his knowledge of the Arctic Refuge area almost immediately, recalling his visits to the area with his wife.
I disagree with Cronon’s notion that people’s idea of wilderness was historically powerful. Undoubtedly, the wilderness notion played a role in forming American identity. Cronon states the consequences of this role when he writes “Thus in the myth of the vanishing frontier lay the seeds of wilderness preservation in the United States, for if wild land had been so crucial in the making of the nation”(Pg 76). But these consequences aren’t particularly profound. Even though the wilderness notion resulted in establishing national parks and preservations, it did not prevent the further development of industry, consumption of forests and mining of natural resources.
This quote is a example of Man vs Nature, because it is showin that they are in lack of resources. Also another quote showing Man vs Nature is that “Of the 1,300 santes brought there in 1863, fewer than 1,000 survived their first winter. This shows how it is Man vs. Nature, because it explains how cold it was up in the Dakota Territory. The Sioux were hungry and forced to live on reservations
Former US President Jimmy Carter addresses the potential for the industrialization of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in “Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey” by Subhankar Banerjee. In this piece, Carter fights for maintaining the Wildlife Refuge by reasoning, with powerful stylistic features, that the beauty and vast importance it plays, overrules the wants of the industries. Carter uses his own journey through and support of the Arctic Refuge as evidence against the industries and their agenda. He outlines his own trip through the Arctic Refuge, writing of the wonders him and his wife Rosalynn experienced. By describing his own personal experience, he provides readers with evidence of the specialness the refuge is.
Additionally, from an environmentalist view, wilderness should not be seen as a separate entity but rather one with humanity. Consequently, where one does not just go to a nature preserve to feel reconnected momentarily,
But, nature does not exclude humans, human excludes themselves from nature. Within the “mists of [the] chopping sea of civilized life, such are the clouds and storms and quicksands and thousand and one items to be allowed for”(277). He uses clouds and storms and quicksands to convey that civilized life includes the same negativity included in the connotation of those conditions, but nonetheless, those too are apart of nature. The purpose of utilizing imagery is so evoke images people already have to connect with them on that level to make them understand that they must find a harmony and balance in the world. So, in order to restore order within one’s individual life, one must defy the social norms that distance themselves from nature to find harmony with it.
In his passage from “Last Child in the Woods,” Richard Louv uses various rhetorical strategies in order to make his audience more supportive of his argument. The passage discusses the connection, or really the separation, between people and nature. On this subject, Louv argues the necessity for people to redevelop their connection with nature. His use of tone, anecdotes, rhetorical questions, and factual examples all help develop the pathos and logos of his piece.
In the wake of the prevalence of industrialize among the United States, the former U.S president Jimmy Carter proposed that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not supposed to be developed for industry in his foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and land, A photographic Journey by Subhankar Banerjee. Jimmy Carter effectively builds his argument by logically utilizing pathos, logos, and ethos to plead with the audiences to take his side. Jimmy Carter employs pathos to appeal to the audience’s emotion for supporting his argument. In paragraph seven, Jimmy Carter takes a stand on the position of American citizens to consider the issue of industry developing, and he suggests that “instead of tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge, we should use our resource more wisely.” To offer a proposal, Jimmy Carter as a citizen
Scott Russell Sanders’ passage from ‘Staying Put: making home in a Restless World’ gives readers the idea that roaming foreign territory and enforcing your ways is worse than staying put and adapting to your surroundings. Sanders achieves this mood through the use of parallelism, juxtaposition, rhetorical questions, and other rhetorical devices. Within the first sentence of the passage, Sanders paints a picture that Americans think that they are inherently good people, always the alpha of the pack that is the world. He describes our selfishness and need for acquiring more land as a ‘seductive virtue’, which can be found in lines 1-2. Sanders again pokes fun at the ‘American Lifestyle’ in lines 20-25.
The harsh reality surrounds the fact that as time and technology advances, the separation between people and nature increases as well. Louv, in his rhetoric from Last Child in the Woods (2008), argues why the separation between society and nature is distressing.
He argues that we should treat our land with care and respect as we now treat one another, for we will be ushering a new era of change the is all for the better. The second half of the essay begins with "The Ecological Conscience". Starting off by stating “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land” and going on to describe how our fight for land is improving it is moving far too slow. This transforms into the
We should value nature and its animals much more (Becker, 1971). In today’s world we have what Becker calls a “power-saw mentality” (Becker, 1971, p. 114). Instead we’re greedy with what nature has to offer us. “Man takes what nature offers us, but usually only what he needs” (Becker, 1971, p. 114). There is a psychological difference in today’s world of what we enjoy out of nature (Becker, 1971).
Introduction: Our earth is the most precious gift of the universe. It is the sustenance of ‘nature’ that is the key to the development of the future of mankind. It is the duty and responsibility of each one of us to protect nature. It is here that the understanding of the ‘environment’ comes into the picture. The degradation of our environment is linked with the development process and the ignorance of people about retaining the ecological balance.