Due to the fact that not all hunters claim all of the animal remains produced from big game hunting, many hunters give the meat, bones, and hide to local communities for their usage. The revenue produced from hunting goes back to the local community that the animal was taken from. All trophy hunters pay many fees for a big game hunt, but considering that most hunters do not take home the entire animal they killed, anything that remains from the hunt is left for the benefit of the community (Big Game). “Game laws should be drawn primarily in the interest of the whole people, keeping steadily in mind certain facts that ought to be self-evident to every one above the intellectual level of those well-meaning persons who apparently think that all shooting is wrong.…” (Roosevelt). This excerpt shows that not all hunters go out to shoot an animal and leave it for dead, the animal is not wasted, it is actually spread throughout the communities for the locals use.
My own opinion of the big game is that it is a horrible, bloody and disgusting hunt that should get forbidden because the animal that they hunt are too beautiful and important to be killed and used. I chose this area because i feel really bad for the animals so i wanted maybe some more people to know about it and do or say something. I personally have to admit that i like shooting real guns or bb guns but only cans or something but not animals.I would cry and feel really bad even if i hit some animal by accident.I had once an accident with one of my bows and arrows,I was trying to hit a squirrel and was thinkin that i 'm anyway not going to hit it because i thought that my aming
Although this is considered a criminal offence, the people of Cedar Ridge didn’t care. To this day nobody knows who committed this crime and nobody wants to fess up about it although there are rewards involved. She argues that the Prairie dogs “Create diversity. Destroy them, and you destroy a varied world.” (Pg 87) I agree with this statement just because I feel like every animal was put on earth to serve a purpose. It isn’t fair that people are murdering animals just because they don’t want them on their property.
Grizzly bear hunting is being treated as a sport and should be stopped. Hunting has been around for a long time, and many people treat it as a sport. People hunt and kill grizzly bears for personal records--not for population control; therefore, hunting them should not be allowed. They should be treated fairly in the environment. Hunting grizzly bears becomes more about who has the biggest display at their house and not about the care for the animal.
These cats can eat birds, Monkeys, Porcupines, pigs and goat. They can also eat animals bigger than them like deer. Those are only some animals that they can eat. Scientists don’t know lots of what they eat because clouded leopards are endangered species and are very good hiders. How Do They Hunt Clouded leopards have many hunting styles and techniques and here is a basic one.
With Duclos returning to the beginning arguments and trying to make counter arguments, I feel is a major weakness for his argument. While returning to his first arguments about how critics often argue that hunting is immoral because it requires intentionally inflicting harm on innocent creatures. Even people who are not comfortable should acknowledge that many animals have the capacity to suffer. If it is wrong to inflict unwanted pain or death on an animal, then it is wrong to hunt. Today it is hard to argue that human hunting is strictly necessary in the same way that hunting is necessary for animals.
According to some, big game hunting is business for the wealthy, yet others believe it may actually provide benefits to the human, and animal population. Big game hunting allows humans and animals to benefit from it. According to Ameena Schelling Ever since the death of Cecil the lion, the world 's been looking at trophy hunting a bit more closely. “While many people have condemned the practice as cruel, ardent big game hunters have stood up to defend it, arguing that
Although there are negatives to big game hunting, the benefits heavily outweigh the opposition. A negative to big game hunting is that it can endanger the hunter. Hunters can be attacked by the animals they hunt and can be injured or kill. As the article says in page 4, “many people die each year due to accidents while hunting”. For instance, Hunters are susceptible to being attacked by the quarry when hunting and if there are others nearby, the animal may start attacking the rest of the group in its angered state.
The author wanted to show that hunting is a careless sport and whether its killing of animals or humans killing is appalling. Rainsford is yelling at Zaroff for his actions but Zaroff doesn't see why hunting humans is worse than a tiger or bear. Connell is wanting to shower that the act of killing anything should have the same reaction as Rainsford when he found out Zaroff kills people. The view of the story changes because Rainsford starts to look just as bad as Zaroff. The Most Dangerous Game by Connell has a deeper meaning than what’s shown on the outside.
Should pit bulls be banned Have you ever wondered why people think that pitbulls are so bad and how they are vicious animals? There are even some people trying to ban pit bulls. Is that even reasonable? Do pit bulls really put that much of a threat on people. They are just a dog there are alligators and other venomous snakes that are killing people and they aren 't banning them or doing harm to them.