A Summary Of Short Term Suspension

485 Words2 Pages

Short and Long Term Suspensions in Accordance to Due Process The United States Supreme Court case Goss v. Lopez (1975) established a sound standard for procedures in suspension of students from school. The procedures are supported by the Fourteenth Amendment, stating that no students shall be suspended without a hearing prior to the suspension. The Rochester City School District Board Policy Manual affirms their procedures and policy by follow the rulings of the Goss v. Lopez (1975) in disciplinary actions towards students.
Due Process Requirements for Short-term Suspension The Rochester City School District (RCSD) protects these rights determined by Goss v. Lopez (1975) in a number of ways in the procedures taken during a short-term suspension. Short-term suspension is defined by the RCSD as a suspension from school that is five days or less (Rochester City School Board Policy Manual 2013). The district requires that the authority proposing …show more content…

The notification allows the student and parents the right to a fair hearing, and the opportunity to explain the actions (Rochester City School Board Policy Manual 2013). Unlike short-term suspensions, long- term suspension hearings are carried out in a formal manner (Rochester City School Board Policy Manual 2013). The district policy towards due process allows the student the right to representation, the right to use witnesses, and the opportunity to present evidence on their behalf. Upon hearing information from the different participating parties, the superintendent shall determine the proper outcome (Rochester City School Board Policy Manual 2013). If the student is found guilty of the accusations justification for suspension will be laid out for the student and parents. Having reviewed the procedure followed by the RCSD it is important to compare it to the ruling of Goss v. Lopez in order to validate their

Open Document