ipl-logo

Should America Have Dropped The Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

181 Words1 Page

“Should America Have Dropped the Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?” argues few actions in war are justifiable, such as America dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. America’s two atomic bombs were the only things that would bring about Japan’s surrender; even the Japanese civilians were prepared to fight invaders with bamboo spears and act as suicide bombers. The Japanese government was prepared to accept 28 million civilian deaths. President Harry Truman decided against a land invasion of Japan to save about 500,000 American lives and millions of Japanese, mostly civilians. By using the atomic bombs, President Truman actually saved thousands of Japanese and American lives. The Japanese government was willing

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Winning Weapon? By Author Ward Wilson

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    In The Winning Weapon? : Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima, author Ward Wilson attempts to make the argument that Japan did not surrender from WWII because of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. But rather that the invasion of the Soviet Union was the deciding factor in their withdraw. He then uses this argument to indicate that our views on nuclear weapons, and how they affected Japan’s military decisions is incorrect. Wilson begins his argument looking at the Japanese’s military and political standing prior to the bombing of Hiroshima.

    Read More

  • Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper

    1963 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Japanese were ruthless and brutal when it came to their militaristic decisions and motives. Dropping the atomic bomb was our final hope in stopping them from performing further harm. Either way, lives were going to be taken. The question we must ask ourselves is whether we wanted those lives to be those of Americans or the Japanese. President Truman had to make a vital decision, and using nuclear warfare was the only way to stop Japan without killing American soldiers.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    608 Words  | 3 Pages

    WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.

    Read More

  • War Memoir Project: The Green Glass Sea By Ellen Klages

    719 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the American public came to learn of, they had no hesitation supporting the government’s actions to use the bombs and destroy the most populous cities in Japan: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Against the will of the

    Read More

  • Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nagasaki was a strategic place to drop the bomb because of the torpedo plant, but Hiroshima only had a military base, so why drop on Hiroshima? Therefore, was the United States’ decision ethical and fair to the

    Read More

  • Harry Truman Decision To Drop The A Bomb Essay

    757 Words  | 4 Pages

    The decisions made to drop the A-bomb in Japan by president Harry Truman are often criticized, but to judge an opinion based off of the standards of this day and era is meaningless. Although everyone has different propositions, views, or opinions the decision that Truman made to protect his country seems like the only justifiable solution of ending this war. President Harry Truman had to make one of the most difficult decisions ever known to mankind. Many critics recognize the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as merciless acts to express the United States mobilization of their military superiority. Therefore, in question of this laborious outcome, how did the United States and Truman come to their commitment of terrorizing millions of lives

    Read More

  • Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    On August 6, 1945, the united states dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, immediately killing 80,000 people. Three days later another one was dropped on Nagasaki. Some historians say the bomb was not needed because according to the author “japan was ready to call it quits anyway. More than 60 of its cities had been destroyed by conventional bombing, the home islands were being blocked by the american navy, and the soviet union entered the war by attacking japanese troops in manchuria” (Dietrich 1).

    Read More

  • Should Trumans Be Allowed To Make Timely Decisions?

    1112 Words  | 5 Pages

    However, it is also true that the bombs led to Japan’s surrender, saving countless lives that would have been lost in a land invasion or continued war. Critics may say that Truman’s decision was unnecessary, as Japan was already on the brink of surrender. However, this argument ignores the fact that Japan had not officially surrendered and there was a significant resistance within the Japanese military to surrender. It also fails to consider the potential consequences of a land invasion, which would have been devastating for both American and Japanese forces. In other words, Truman’s decision to drop the bombs was also criticized for its humanitarian consequences.

    Read More

  • Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary

    1394 Words  | 6 Pages

    Name: Course Instructor: Class: Date: Critical Book Review: Prompt and Utter Destruction Introduction Within weeks, word on the US dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki began to spread that the main reason behind the bombs was to save the lives of Americans (Bernard). It was put that hundreds of thousands of American military causalities were saved through the bombings.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

    1822 Words  | 8 Pages

    To think of the Second World War is to think of a very strategic game of chess. The objective is not to beat your opponent simply through fierce head on offense, but to understand the power of a well-planned defense. What moves can you make to keep them in check, how can you determine the threat of your opponent’s next move? The decision to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were just that, a strategic chess move. I argue that the decision to drop the Atomic bombs in Japan were necessary in order to end the war in the pacific, but to also to detour the impending invasion of Japan by the Soviets.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Truman's Audio Recorded Radio Speech

    1561 Words  | 7 Pages

    The article ends with how the U.S was successful in it’s use of the atomic bomb to force Japan’s surrender in World War II. This article is relevant to my thesis, because it helps me learn about what made the the Japanese surrender, and how the violence from the Americans veered their decisions to compromise with them. It provides me valuable insight on the American government's thought process and plan to destroy Japan, as well as evidence on how massive the atomic bomb really was and how much it impacted the Japanese. This article is very trustworthy because it is the exact words of the secretary of war on February 1947; Henry L.Stimson. Also, the source is reliable because it is from a popular database and greatly worked with and used by many

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb

    630 Words  | 3 Pages

    Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and

    Read More

  • Summary Of We Didn T Have To Drop The Bomb

    964 Words  | 4 Pages

    A former Ohio representative, Dennis Kucinich in the web article, We Didn’t Have to Drop The Bomb published on the 70th anniversary of the Japan bombings addresses the topic of the use of the atomic bomb and passionately argues that the use of nuclear weapons were not necessary in order to capitulate Japan by listing many quotes from high ranking government officials and giving his own personal opinion. Kucinich supports his claim by using factual quotes from credible sources such as Admiral William Leahy, who believed in that Japan would have surrendered without the use of atom head of staff; therefore, proving to the audience that others also believe in his cause. The author’s overall purpose of writing this article is to persuade the American

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.

    Read More

More about Should America Have Dropped The Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Open Document