“Should American Citizenship Be a Birthright” is a debate about immigrants coming over and having kids to give them citizenship in the USA. Many immigrants have “anchor babies” so that they can live in the USA freely along with their newborn child. In this debate they discuss how many undocumented immigrants live here. Also, it is explained that if the country changes the 14th amendment it will not be right, because the USA is made up of immigrants. In Chavez, Linda’s article “The Case for Birthright Citizenship” it is explained how America’s citizenship policy is different than most countries. In Germany it is much harder to become a citizen as one of your parents must be a resident for at least 8 years. Chavez talks about a case where a Chinese
In Leo R. Chavez’s ethnography, The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation, the claimed problem of Latino immigration, specifically Mexicans, is tackled using interviews, statistics, and other works of literature. Chavez’s ethnography not only discusses Latino immigration but Latino invasion, integration, organ transplants and even Latina fertilization. One of Chavez’s big topics is on how the media influences the public to believe that Latinos are planning an invasion or take-over in order to gain the land that was originally Mexico’s. The topic of Latina reproduction and fertilization comes up multiple times through Chavez’s ethnography. Another main topic that plays a part in Chavez’s argument is the Latino role in public marches and the citizenship aspect of their actions.
It has been argued that birthright citizenship, or the legal right to citizenship for all children born in a country 's territory, regardless of parentage, may reward/encourage illegal immigrant parents an excuse to stay in the country. Despite this possibility, the 14th Amendment should not be modified. The 14th Amendment states that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” (U.S. Const. amend.
I profoundly agree with Chavez as she talks about, “Repealing the birthright citizenship is a terrible idea” (596). If we as Americans take the joy and pride of people that come to this land for freedom and a new life, what make us any better than Great Britain when we first started to build this country. We settle here for a change of mind and also a change of heart. By that being the case, us trying to take away the birthright citizenship to those who wasn’t born on this soil is absolutely wrong.
One of the main reasons most of immigrants do not seek citizenship is that the cost of applying to become a citizen is very expensive, which they cannot afford. Whether you are documented or undocumented immigration, you still have to pay for processing your application to obtain citizenship. Immigrants has to have a legal permanent residency in order to qualify to apply for citizenship and even if they are legal permanent resident, the application fees become barrier from being citizen. The cost of citizenship is so expensive for applicants because the immigration is not funded by government. Paul McDaniel, who wrote the article “The Cost of Citizenship is a Barrier for Some Immigrants” argues “the cost of citizenship has become a systemic
Those who are more liberal, are voting for modifying or abolishing this law, mainly because it is as Trump said, a “magnet for immigration”. Many republicans believe that expectant mothers are illegally traveling into the United States to deliver their baby in hopes of a better future. One out of every twelve newborns, or about 340,000 babies per year, are children of illegal immigrants (http://www.pewhispanic.org/, August 11, 2010). Another motive to abolish birthright citizenship is because in the amount of money it would save taxpayers and the benefits that would come with that..
Immigration is deeply rooted in the American culture, yet it is still an issue that has the country divided. Marcelo and Carola Suarez-Orozco, in their essay, “How Immigrants Became ‘Other’” explore the topic of immigration. They argue that Americans view many immigrants as criminals entering America with the hopes of stealing jobs and taking over, but that this viewpoint is not true. They claim that immigrants give up a lot to even have a chance to come into America and will take whatever they can get when they come. The Suarez-Orozco’s support their argument using authority figures to gain credibility as well as exemplification through immigrant stories.
Babies that are born in the United States and are instantly U.S. citizens and thus can apply for their families citizenship once they are of age citing the reason of “ family unification”( Chavez,193). Birthright citizenship differs from traditional citizenship as it is a guaranteed right for the baby; which leads to discussions of whether they deserve to be citizens of the U.S. or not (Chavez,192). Parents of these anchor babies could be taking advantage of this birth right and thus giving them a surefire way to get citizenship of their own once the baby comes of age. While these types of citizenship differ, the definition of citizenship shown by Chavez is one that has emphasis of having a legal reason of belonging, while social stigmas
For a nine-year-old who wants nothing more than to make her mother proud this was exciting. In the beginning, we can see her excitement and desire, “in the beginning I was just as excited as my mother, maybe even more so.” (Tan). However, as we follow the story we see her excitement quickly fade to sorrow and anger. The high expectations immigrant families place on their children is still a very relevant social issue and can be witnessed throughout the United States.
In his essay “My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant” (2011), Jose Antonio Vargas asserts that we should continue immigration reform, and discover a way to grant authorized citizenship for the population who remains here undocumented―and who contribute every day to society. Vargas, a journalist and immigration rights activist, is known for divulging his position as an undocumented immigrant in his essay “My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant”―in hopes of sparking effective changes to the immigration system in the United States. His argument is that the United States should gradually progress with the DREAM act, and to initiate a sensible and tenable path for the children who suffer from the similar situation. In my analysis of Vargas’s essay,
In times such as now, immigration policy is a topic of controversial and emotional discussion. The key in having educational, progressive, and prosperous conversations is understanding the theoretical foundations behind the argument that a person stands for or believes in. Having factual evidence to support ideas on concepts such as: the opportunities that immigrants bring to a country, what the international rules actually are that govern the entry and exit of people from one country to another, and the causes, trends, and consequences of international immigration. Finding reason and support for these claims can take the discussion behind immigration policy from one of heated and emotional argument to one of educational and beneficial conversation.
The Worker Next Door by Barry R. Chiswick, Angels in America by John Tierney, and Our Brave New World of Immigration. These three articles talk about how do people deal with immigrants. Immigrants are everywhere especially in the U.S. Each articles made lists and arguments on how if immigrants if they left, that stuff would still get done. Chiswick point is with a decline in low skilled foreign workers, life would go on.
Should birthright citizenship be Illegal? A hot topic in The United States of America these days is immigration. How can we decrease the number of illegal aliens entering the nation? One solution that will be the focus here is should the United States of America get rid of the right of citizenship from birthright.
“The Immigrant contribution” and “The Quilt of a Country” are two essays that share a similar focus, however, they cover two drastically different sides of the topic. Both of them share the main idea that America is a country made up almost entirely of immigrants. Kennedy’s essay, “The immigrant Contribution”, focuses on how immigrants have affected our country, whereas Quindlen’s essay discusses how people of many different cultures coexist and work together. The essays both concentrate on immigration in America and how immigration has shaped and molded our culture. The two authors describe the many different aspects of immigration in immensely different ways.
Though why do these incommensurable origins create impediments for people immigrating to the United States? In the article “anchor babies, birthright citizenship and the 14th Amendment” states every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States (. Basically anyone who is born in American soil is a citizen who comes with all laws assisting and protecting that said individual.
An illegal immigrant, who works for their keep, pays taxes, doesn't get into trouble, and just wants a better life in a country, should be granted citizenship. An illegal immigrant is a person who migrates to a different country in a way that is in violation of the immigrant laws. Immigration has been a tough topic to bring up for many years in America. Illegal immigrants are seen as a bad thing for America, but some see them as an economic savior. There are over 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.