Should Animal Testing Be Banned

Animals aren’t something that we could manipulate they are living creatures that have feelings just like us. Humans wouldn’t like to be in cages or laboratories right? Animal testing is cruel because scientists do many horrible tests on the animals. For instance, they leave the animals in cages where they can’t even move their body. The scientists don’t even care if the animal dies.

Many people asks everyday “Are GMOs bad for my health?” The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the USA regulates genetic engineering with animals and their products under the new animal drug provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). It helps monitor and maintain certain standards, including input from the public, when it comes to genetically engineering animals.

In addition, The FDA reports that, ¨92% of drugs approved for testing on humans fail to receive approval for human use¨.This shows that there is no point for animal testing and that animal testing doesn't do any good for all the harm that it causes to the animals. This proves that this is important because it could also hurt humans because it could do wonders for the animals and harm us because of the different body chemistry. Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University, states that "it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human." Therefore, animals have very different bodies then us and very different chemistry and therefore does not work well for humans at all. This suggests that, because we do not want two living things to both be harmed, animal testing is not useful.

In the field of medical testing the use of animal is commonly seen. The use of animals in testing is currently a hot issue. In an article on the Norther Star, author Nathan Fulkerson talks about how animal testing has led to medical breakthroughs. Yet, Animal rights groups and organizations have been pushing for the banning of animal testing. Their reason for pushing the ban is that using the animal testing is cruel and inhumane.

Over 20 million animals are used every year for scientific and monetary studies. These tests are used to produce medical cures, and to check the safety of different medications. The question is, should we keep testing animals for scientific research? People have different thoughts or opinions on animals; many think of animals as their playfellows, while others visual animals on an account of advancing and furthering medical research. The logic remains that animals are being utilized by animal facilities around the world.

Specific Purpose: By the end of my speech, the audience will know about the problem of conducting experiments on animals and the ethical issue of the cruel treatment of animals by the researchers. While the problem of conducting experiments on animals draws attention of the society, the speech would present the limitation of animal experiments and outline the alternatives. Central Idea: 1. Conducting experiments on animals has become one of crucial ethical issues of the modern society and it has even been banned in some countries.

So, using animals is really useless because just because a drug is safe for an animal does not mean it will necessarily be accurate and safe for humans. PISC scientist Gilly Stoddard says “it is unconscionable that animals are dying as a result of the failure to update testing guidelines.” (O’Driscoll 8) Animals should not be dying because humans are using them for inaccurate tests.

For many years animals have been experimented on for the hope of finding cures for many illnesses that plague society. There has been a significant amount of research that shows that many diseases have been cured because of experimenting on animals ( Source B). Out of the population, 17 17 million people are diagnosed with diabetes that is 6.2% of all American ( Source A). "Dogs were crucial to the research that identified the cause of diabetes, which led to the development of insulin" (Source A).

There are hundreds of brands that test on animals for cosmetics, and not one of them is humane. Cosmetic animal testing has been a controversial issue for years. The first documented test on an animal was done in the mid 1850s by Charles Darwin. Soon in 1922, animal testing allowed insulin to be isolated from dogs (Murnaghan). In 1938, the United States passed the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic act, after an incident with a woman’s mascara led her to become blind.

However, this sacrifice of an animal’s life does not provide accurate information about the risk to humans in animal experiments. This is because the physical responses to test chemicals of different species, humans and animals, are not the same. Materials that were harmless to laboratory animals could be dangerous to humans, and substances that were harmful to animals could also be harmful to humans. Animals used in experiment are forced to die unconditionally in pain, such as bleeding, paralysis, and cramps. Michaela Kroeger introduced the '3R', which means reduction,

The discovery of over 160 drugs and vaccines (Sun n.p.) has been through the use of animal testing. “Some other medical advancements that have been discovered through animal testing include penicillin, blood transfusions, insulin (that controls blood sugar levels of diabetics), kidney transplants, and vaccines for polio and meningitis (Sun n.p.). ” Almost every medical breakthrough has come from testing on animals. The polio vaccination, from the polio diseased, has reduced tremendously over the years due to animal testing.

Animals testing is torture and bad so we should stop testing on animals . Animal testing is mean and dangerous to the animals being tested on. One example is they were trying to test different shampoos to see if any of them burned their eyes. To do this they hold them up by there feet with clips to test the shampoos. They don’t get feed or taken care of.

Although the idea of testing with animals may sound horrible, animal testing is extremely necessary to keep developing new medicines, and treatments. The benefits of animal testing outweigh the cons of hurting animals for our own wellbeing. These benefits include, many long found treatments and cures that has helped many people throughout the years. Animal testing is also the only way that scientists can properly test on. And lastly, whether many people believe it or not it also benefits animals as well.

There is much controversy with regards to animal testing for medical research and there has been throughout the centuries. We can trace the issue back all the way to the 4th century when we have the first record of animal experimentation, Aristotle dissecting animals for study. In the 1600s, scientists began using animals as a way to explore the human body which led to many advancements in the medical field. Such advancements include Emil von Bering finding a cure for diphtheria toxin for guinea pigs; further research allowed him to produce a diphtheria vaccine for humans (Bright).In spite of these many medical achievements brought on through the use of animal testing, there are still those that argue the practice is not justifiable and should

Why animal testing is necessary People would argue that animal testing is essential to find cures for illness. Animal testing has helped find, develop cures and treatments. Since in the past 100 years of testing it has resulted in many successes. Experimentation in dogs helped lead to the discovery of insulin, but the dog’s pancreas were removed as a result.