The information connects to the beginning thesis, by how it shows that animal testing is just an excuse to hurt animals, because humans test on animals that will likely need a different cure than humans. While some animals may also benefit from the results of animal testing, there are some drugs, like aspirin, that will kill the animals tested on, yet aspirin still helps humans. The point of animals testing most of the time is to help humans, and helping the animals tested on is a possible side effect. Why do humans hurt animals and say it may help an animal, but hurting the animals is really for helping humans. As well as only finding cures for animals and wasting resources, humans also still have an immense risk when using the drug tested on
“We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” (Immanuel Kant) Animals, ranging from the horse fly to the mouse, are used in laboratory experiments and scientific research all over the world and are often subject to poor treatment. They are critically used for research to learn more about the human body without harming the human being itself. Although many people might argue testing on animals puts them at risk, how many human and animal lives have actually been protected as a result of animal testing? Animals should continue to be used in scientific experiments to not only lower human suffering but also animal suffering . Lowering human suffering is one reason of using animals in research.
To replace the use of such brutal testing methods, labs are switching to more humane forms of testing. For example, CeeTox is a lab that employs human based testing methods to test cosmetics and other potentially dangerous chemicals. The use of human cell cultures replaces the need for testing on animals using harmful methods such as inserting dangerous chemicals into their body parts. Furthermore this lab collaborates with the Food and Drug
Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food or drugs” (“Animal Testing”). Unfortunately, some cosmetic companies treat animals unethically during testing; this brings into question whether or not the practice of animal testing can be considered ethical, or even necessary, in regards to cosmetic purposes. Those with pro-animal testing views may argue that the practice of testing cosmetics on animals is necessary for human safety, however, with modern advances in technology, there are now more options for alternatives than ever before. With support from major companies and governments, alternatives to animal testing could potentially become the standard in the near future. Those who support animal testing argue that animal testing in cosmetics is necessary to ensure that the product is safe for human use.
31 Jan. 2018. The definition of animal testing is the procedures that involve living animals for the purpose of research. Some methods of animal testing include exposure to drugs and chemicals, genetic manipulation, water and food withdrawal, infliction of injuries, etc. This article is extremely biased. It tells all about the negative details of animal testing and the harming to the animals, but it doesn’t include the benefits of animal testing.
These animals are tested with things such as medicinal substances, cosmetics, and food additives as well as tested to learn more about diseases and biological disorders. Many of these tests are useful and important in order to make sure that if a human were to consume them, they would have no adverse or negative effects. However, if it will cause harm to the animals, they should not be done, and most if not all are likely to potentially create physical and psychological problems. “Although pain and suffering are subjective experiences, studies from multiple disciplines provide objective evidence of animals' abilities to experience pain (Beck and Ferdowsian, “Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing”).” Since these animals are obviously able to feel pain, the testing should be precautious and considerate of the animal’s welfare. Nuno Henrique Franco, a graduate in the Laboratory Animal Science group, agreed saying, “While animal experiments have played a vital role in scientific and biomedical progress and are likely to continue to do so in the foreseeable future, it is nonetheless important to keep focusing on the continuous improvement of the well-being of laboratory animals, as well as further development of replacement alternatives for animal experiments (Franco, “Animal
Without animal testing, we will become the subject of experiments. People should be aware that without any alternative in place, it would be the same as saying that human rights are less important than animal rights. Human beings desperately need animal testing for the development of cures as well as for the sake of civilisation. If it wasn’t for animal testing, human beings would not be alive today. Animal testing has played a significant role in developing numerous medications that are absolutely necessary for us to live such as antibiotics, penicillin, and
list of cons of animal rights Prevents safety testing Is it enough to save animal lives when the cost is a human life placed in danger or lost? new products and medications that could save people but are considered harmful until tested on certain subjects will never be used if animal testing is no longer allowed. It would be even more immoral if test subjects used or human themselves. This may have been going on with clinical trials, but the only difference is that medications used in these trials have already been tested on animals and are considered safe. Stunt research development Animal testing open doors in research of new products and medication that will significantly speed up the development in the medicine field.
These people strongly believe that animals also carry rights like humans and it’s against the rights to change their DNA and genetically modify it for human use. Lastly, the people also strongly disagree with the fact that hundreds of these animals are used for clinical trial research and transgenic animals are not unlike. 2. They can be unsafe for human consumption: - The safety for the products produced by transgenic animal is no guarantee. This is true because not all experiments on transgenic animals are effective.
You may think it depends. But let me tell you a story. When asking experimenters why they experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are like us”. But when asking experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are not like us”. (relate to audience) II.