Should Athletes Be Allowed In Sports?

991 Words4 Pages
The earliest references to using drugs for this purpose date back almost three thousand years to the first Olympics, when competitors boosted their testosterone levels by eating crushed sheep testicles.(eBook). The doping in sports controversy began when athletes from all sports have made their intentions clear--they intend to use performance-enhancing substances no matter how severe the punishments(Cashmore 1). Doping in sports became a problem because doping jeopardizes the health of the athlete (Tannsjo 1). As a result of the issue sports federations for both professional and amateur athletic organizations began to pass more stringent regulations regarding drugs and establish tests to enforce the bans (eBook).There are two points of views…show more content…
For example, according to Nancy Armour’s article, “Babashoff: Dopers Same as Thieves”, it states, “It’ll be if someone worked for a year or four years and you went up and you stole their paycheck” (Armour 1). In other words, athletes work the majority of their life working to become an athlete and another athlete comes around who takes performance enhanced drugs and comes to steal their payment. To clarify, allowing athletes to take performance enhanced drugs makes other regular athletes life’s work a waste. Moreover, Crouse explains in Clean Athletes in Doping Era, and Glory Lost, “The medal was nice, but it could not make up for the fact that he lost out on endorsement money that would have totaled ‘over a million bucks, for sure,’ he told Canadian reporters at the time” (Crouse 3). To explain, athletes who take performance enhanced drugs take away another athlete’s deserving prize money. Therefore, letting athletes take performance enhanced drugs makes them a thief to other regular athletes. In conclusion, prize money will be taken away from regular athletes if athletes who continue to use performance enhanced drugs use
Open Document