Why have Capital punishment be a controversial issue? Capital punishment has been a controversial issue in the American judicial system for many years. Electrocution, injection, hanging, and gassing are different forms the death penalty has been used. Many people argue that fighting violence with violence achieves a useful purpose in society. Additionally, people argue that a reasonable punishment for a person that has taken the life of another is “an eye for an eye.” However, taking a man’s life as a form of justice is wrong.
Instead, some criminals are wrongfully convicted and never went through a fair trial. Taxes would still be high and inhumanity would still be the problem. By sentencing a criminal to death, the people who protecting the laws are also the killers. America is the only free, democratic country where death penalty exist. The system should be abolished because one wrong evidence can cause a life.
Although a lot of people may disagree that using the death penalty is wrong because it 's taking the life of another human, many others agree that it 's right because it 's punishing people who don 't obey the laws of our county. The death penalty was given to a person for a very serious capital law such as murder, the death penalty was believed to “deter crime”. The Death Penalty was a punishment that was used against people who committed capital crimes, and as for their disobedience to their country they were given a certain punishment for their crime, some were more harsh than others believe it or not but they all resulted in death. There were many laws that could have been broken for one to receive the death penalty such as, murder treason and many more horrible crimes. The are many different types of ways that you could be killed according to the death penalty.
Capital murder is one of the most controversial topics in this country. It 's a very two sided argument, many people have their own opinion on the topic. It is a sensitive topic for some people because, personal feelings and emotions really come into play when discussing the death penalty. There are a vast amount of reason that serve great for being against it but, there is also just as many fantastic reasons as of why we should keep using capital murder. There are those who believe that no human being, no matter how much power or jurisdiction they have, should not have the ability and power to take away another persons life.
The reform people have thought of is to narrow the range of offenses that qualify for a sentence of death. He uses the words “This looks promising at first” already insinuating it will not work because of the changing arbitrary there is when sentencing someone. He makes a comparison of people in death row and the prisoners in the general prison population being equal, only difference is one is placed on death row, spending taxpayer money and the other is waiting to die in prison with no help from taxpayers money, so basically a certain death row but for free. He expresses that the death row is for people who deem it to be necessary in order to promote social vengeance. This can make a reader feel like they are buying into societal norms, and that it is not okay with humans doing such thing since it is not always right.
This rate went down 1.9% since 2010. Research shows that the highest number of abortions happen in California and New York .There’s 12.5 abortions per 1000 women between the ages of 15-44. Because abortion is unsafe for women, denies the fetus’s right to life, and murders unborn babies, it should be illegal in the United States.
Although supporters of the death penalty often suggest arguments that cite retribution for violent crimes as being instrumental in justice, several studies and research have revealed that taking the life of another human being through capital punishment only perpetuates a cycle of violence. Therefore, it is necessary to abolish the capital
However, this very thinking contradicts our justice system that believes a defendant is “innocent until proven guilty,” by basically saying that justice doesn’t even pertain to capital punishment. You can’t say justice is being served and the person is innocent until proven guilty when you have the wrong person sitting in their cell on death row. Still, proponents believe our justice system should be principled on the proverb “an eye for an eye.” However, Byler goes on to argue, “Nobody advocates punishing rapists with rape or molesting molesters, yet the death penalty is deemed an appropriate response to violent crime” (Byler). And so opponents of the death penalty argue: Why can’t
There are a number of practical arguments made for the death penalty. Because the death penalty is such a powerful construct, many argue that it decreases crime rates through deterrence. While many believe that the death penalty is more of a deterrent than a lengthy prison sentence, the very concept of ‘deterrence’ is argued by many as inapplicable to criminal psychology, especially if mental illness is involved. Criminals rarely think about the consequences of their actions and this is especially true with crimes of passion. By killing felons, the death penalty removes the burden of housing them within the penitentiary system.
J.R.R Tolkien once said, “many that live deserves death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.” The death penalty should be repealed because its very stressful for those involved, it is extremely expensive, and it has convicted innocent people. One reason why the death penalty should be illegal is because it’s very stressful on those who are involved.
The proposal of issuing the death penalty in the face of hate crimes and incidents is steadily gaining popularity as well as harsher criticism against the overall humanity of capital punishment. Although some people believe it to reduce the amount of those looking to commit these felonies from the streets, those convicted of federal hate crimes should not be put to death because
Capital Punishment:The Deadly Truth The death penalty is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. People in the United States are constantly debating over capital punishment and if it is beneficial in our society. One side of the debate states that some people can redeem themselves and that it is inhumane. Others claim that the inmates are guilty and should suffer the consequences for their actions. Who hasn’t heard an eye for an eye?
The rate of executions has drastically dropped since then (“Death Penalty”). Thanks to the Eighth Amendment, and more equal representation in the legal system, the rate of unlawful executions has receded. The highest number of executions was ninety-eight in 1999. Currently, only thirty-one states in the U.S. still use Capital Punishment (“Some Examples”). Oklahoma is included among those thirty-eight remaining states that still use the death penalty.
In today’s day and age, a person does not get put to death for just any crime. A recurring argument against the death penalty is that sentencing a defendant to death violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition. The Eighth Amendment protects against cruel and unusual punishment. Mental illness is expressly recognized as a mitigating factor in most death penalty statutes. The Supreme Court came to the conclusion in the case of Ford vs. Wainwright that the use of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to execute a person whose mental state renders understanding of capital punishment is impossible.