There are many controversial issues surrounding the rights of people with disabilities in today’s society. Some of these issues revolve around the issue of parenting. The overarching question that sparks debate from both sides is the the question of whether or not individuals with intellectual disabilities should be allowed to have children. The debate over this question stems from the issue of whether the child will be safe and if they will be given an adequate environment to grow up in. There are many arguments for either side of this debate, with facts and opinions to back them. On one side of this argument, many people believe that people with intellectual disabilities should not be allowed to have children. The main reason behind this belief is the risk that these children may be put in while growing up. The children may not receive proper treatment because of their parents disability. In the past, most individuals with intellectual disabilities did not have children because they were not given proper treatment and were mainly forced in institutions with improper care. Because of the parents intellectual disability they may disregard some of the important things that a child needs, such as nutrition, hygiene, and attention. Another issue that parents with disabilities can face is trouble coping with their …show more content…
One side believes that individuals with intellectual disabilities will put their child at risk and not give them proper care. The other side believes that with the help of supports and unconditional love, these parents will be able to provide for all of their child’s needs. I believe that it is important to recognize that every individual is different, so by looking at multiple factors for each person, is important when determining if someone is fit to have a child or
During the beginning of modern Europe, there were conflicting views on the proper way to view children. Previously in history, the infant mortality rate was very high, so kids were treated more like adults and were often neglected because odds were they would die. There was a resounding view that kids should be treated harshly in order to become strong. Then in the seventeenth century, the idea of being tender and gentle to your kids was introduced. The way in children were brought up was influenced by assumptions made on both old and new schools of thought.
It is important not to stereotype a child with a disability, as this can lead to low self-esteem, for example a child with specific learning needs might be expected to do poorly in all subjects at school not just the ones affected by the learning need and this is not always the case. Since I have worked in our setting I have been introduced to quite a few children which have different types of disabilities. We aim to make sure that each individual is treated the same and included in all activities by adapting the activity to the child's individual
One can be born with mental or even physical disabilities and also some
“Only 50 years ago persons with intellectual disabilities were scorned, isolated and neglected. Today, they are able to attend school, become employed and assimilate into their local community” (Nelson Mandela). Prior to the later part of the 20th century people with intellectual disabilities were often ridiculed, treated unfairly, feared, and locked away in institutions. According to Rhonda Nauhaus and Cindy Smith in their article Disability Rights through the Mid-20th Century, The laws of any nation reflect its societal values. The real life issue of discrimination towards people with intellectual disabilities in the United States and Australia is demonstrated in the novel, Of Mice and Men by showing how this issue affects one of the main characters, Lennie Smalls.
A life of severe disability, is not a life worth living. Therefore, an infant born with a severe physical or cognitive impairment should not be allowed to live. Or any person for that matter, regardless of age who suffers from a severe cognitive disability should be lawfully killed. At least that is a belief held by a certain professor at Princeton University. Harriet McBryde Johnson, a disability advocate and lawyer had the opportunity to debate these beliefs with Professor Peter Singer.
Question 2 2.1 Describe ways in which having a child with a complex disability or condition can impact on different aspects of families lives. To live with disable child can have deep impact on overall family members. It turns out to be an exclusive shared experience for the families and this may impact on the overall family functioning. While considering the positive impact, this widens the horizons, raising more awareness among family members considering their
They argued that no intellectually disabled person should be executed under the basis of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution (APA, 1989). They argued that the disabilities related to intellectual disability are directly correlated to a criminal responsibility and the punishment for the criminal activity. They stated that if a person is intellectually disabled they are unable to not only understand their actions, but control their actions because they do not have the cognitive or behavior development that should have occurred during their development (APA, 1989). People with intellectual disabilities have a reduced ability to cope and function in the world because they have severe impairments in judgment making, logical reasoning, strategic thinking, and control of their impulsivity. This relates to the level of their ability to conform to the law’s requirements and to the degree of the defendant’s blame which is an integral part of the insanity defense.
This essay aims to bring light to the very real issue of parents practicing modern day eugenics on their children. Genetically selecting for disabled children is the goal of the “Deaf of Deaf” movement. Although parent autonomy over their own child is a given, the utmost importance needs to be placed on the child’s right to an open future. Deaf people do not view their lack of hearing as a disability and flourish within their cohesive community. However, deliberately forcing this lifestyle on a child violates their right to make their own decisions about their life.
In the beginnings, eugenics was the scientific attempts to create genetically perfect plants. Scholars such Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer and Gregory Mendel focused on mapping out traits that caused variation in animals, humans, and plants, that affected their survivability and adaptability. Inspired by these theories a new ideology of how to improve human race was cultivated, which was based upon the belief that genetically inherited traits were responsible for social stratification. Coined by the European theorist Francis Galton, “Eugenics is the study the practice or advocacy of controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization) to improve the population’s genetic composition. This paper discusses the medicalization
The decision should be entirely the parents business and their own choice. This quote will influence on how I do things in the future. I can’t judge anything just because it is not “perfect”. A disabled person did not ask to be disabled. So why should I judge them just because they are different from my “perfect” view of what a person should be like.
In this report I will discuss both the Social and Medical Models, define their pros and cons and give a short reflection on my own opinion of the two models in everyday use today. Both the medical and the social models of disability describe how they see disability and how they feel disabilities and those suffering should be treated. Both models have very different views on the causes of, how disabilities should be taken care of and by whom and both have their strengths and weaknesses when it comes to caring for those with disabilities. Medical Model
I think I am more aligned to the position I think I am more aligned to the position of people who decide not to have kids. I think the decisions someone makes of having or not having kids, should be based on the happiness it brings to you. All reasons have an explain on why they are doing it, some people feel more happy not having kids because it gives them more time to focus on themselves. I think I am more inclined to people who decide not to have children Even though I am already a parent and I wouldn’t picture my life without her I agree with the people who decide not to take that route. .
However, ethical considerations for this problems becomes difficult when it is difficult to decide what is a disability. Deaf community often argues that hearing impairment is a culture, thus it should be permitted to choose a child with the same culture as them3. Therefore, one
Having kids for most people is a lifelong dream they have, while others do not see themselves having kids, or women who want kids and cannot. For women who do not want kids, it is simply because they do not want them nor do they want the financial trouble, responsibility, and they want more time with their careers. By choosing not to have kids is not being selfish, its being responsible. For many young adults that are focused and devoted to their careers and in serious relationships, having kids is just not in the picture.
As the statistics shown above say, disabled people are considered an embarrassment to be around and considered unproductive people, and therefore are excluded from their society. This group of people is socially excluded in many ways: 1) Excluded from leisure facilities Disabled people are usually deprived from their rights of having fun and spending their leisure time like normal people. Have you seen cinemas with special seats for paralyzed people for example? The answer would be no probably. Disabled people find it difficult to enter leisure facilities like swimming pools, bowling centers and cinemas, although with simple adjustments these places could be suitable for