Leo Kaplan
Ms. Skemp-Cook
Academic Writing
8 May 2023
The Case For Paying College Athletes College athletes are not receiving the respect they deserve. They work day after day putting in the effort to contend for division championships and earn their team money but in the process, they are not being compensated in return. With schools collecting tons of revenue every year, college programs should have no problem paying athletes. For example, the Department of Education has stated that in 2019, college athletic programs earned $14 billion, which was a major increase from $4 billion in 2003 (Drozdowski). To add onto this, this data of income doesn't include all their money earned from broadcasting or sponsorships (Drozdowski). With all
…show more content…
In 2019, across all athletic programs in the United States, the NCAA collected $15.8 billion in revenue from their student athletes' performances (Zimbalist). This shows that overall, athletes have done a lot for their programs, just by doing what they love. Other jobs, like working in an office or working at a fast food restaurant during college, are just temporary jobs and only serve the purpose of earning extra money. It does not make sense to reimburse someone working a job only for the sake of money and not compensate those who are trying to do what they love for the rest of their lives. Colleges also do not compensate enough towards athletic scholarships, so earning money is very necessary for students. The University of Louisville athletics collects $45 million a year, while they only give out 13 scholarships, which means they are only spending $400,000 a year ("Should College Athletes Be Paid? Top 3 Pros and Cons”). Out of that $45 million, the rest is being paid to the coaches at a whopping $8 million a year and the assistant coaches at $500,000 a year ("Should College Athletes Be Paid? Top 3 Pros and Cons”). Six-figure salaries are rewarded to every single part of the athletic department, except the players, who go unpaid ("Should College Athletes Be Paid? Top 3 Pros and Cons”). This is a clear red flag on how …show more content…
"Should College Athletes Be Paid?: BestColleges." BestColleges.com, 10 Mar. 2023, https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/analysis/2021/09/07/should-college-athletes-be-paid/
"Should College Athletes Be Paid? Top 3 Pros and Cons." ProCon.org, 27 Mar. 2023, https://www.procon.org/headlines/paying-college-athletes-top-3-pros-and-cons/.
Thomas, Brennan. "Pay for Play: Should College Athletes Be Compensated?" Bleacher Report, Bleacher Report, 3 Oct. 2017, https://bleacherreport.com/articles/654808-pay-for-play-should-college-athletes-be-compensated.
Avella, Joe. "NBA Legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Explains Why the NCAA Should Pay College Athletes." Business Insider, www.businessinsider.com/ kareem-abdul-jabbar-ncaa-should-pay-their-athletes-2016-3#:~:text=Kareem%20Abdul% 2DJabbar%3A%20I%20think,And%20that's%20absolutely%20exploitation. Accessed 26 May 2023.
Vuleta, Branka. "Mind-Blowing Scholarship Stats for 2023 - Whattobecome." What To Become, 20 Feb. 2023,
The debate of whether not college athletes should be paid has been going on for a couple decades now. With college institutions gaining revenue from football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, Dr. Dennis Johnson thinks that “There now is a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship” (2012). On the other hand, Dr. John Acquaviva is satisfied with the current college system in which colleges provide athletic scholarships which reward a free college education in return for representing the university’s athletic program (2012). Dr. Johnson then follows up Dr. Aquaviva’s claim with his five selling points for the paying of college athletes and Dr. Aquaviva provides five points
Hala Warda Kristin McGregor English 90R 22 October 2015 Summary and Response#3: “College Athletes Should Be Paid” Ann Kaufmann’s article “College Athletes Should Be Paid” explains that because college football and men’s basketball programs are so profitable, the athletes who play them should be paid. One reason they should be paid is because they spend more time practicing than they study. For example, “college football and basketball players often spend upwards of 50 hours a week during the season at their sport” (452). Another reason is NCAA doesn’t allow players to accept any gifts money from anyone. For instance, the article states that “not surprising, college players are sometimes tempted to take money under the table” (452).
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
College athletes frequently put in a lot of time, effort, and risk, but they don't always receive the credit or compensation they deserve from the NCAA and the schools they represent. One factor as to why college athletes should
Many people know or have heard about college coaches and college programs getting a lot of money after each game, in 2019 the NCAA total athletic revenue among all of the athletic departments was 18.9 billion dollars. In 2020 U.S. Congressman Mark Walker set out a bill about college athletes getting paid for their names, images, and likeness and he wished that it would be voted on in 2020 and that in 2021 it might go into effect. In the article “NCAA clears the way for athletes to profit from names, images and likenesses” Mark Walker States “ college athletes should get profit off of their names and image and likenesses because athletic programs wouldn’t have to pay so much to them and he also states that the program they play for should pay them 1,000 dollars each month to keep the players interest high. Given this evidence, it can be seen that letting college players get paid off of their names and image and likenesses would benefit them because they wouldn’t have to worry about getting another job or struggle with money problems if the NCAA would pay them 1,000 dollars each month and that could also help the program out because they wouldn’t have to worry about paying them after each game. This Proves my claim because the NCAA is paid around 18.9 billion dollars each year from the athletic department and none of that goes to the athletes that they have put their bodies on the line for the program each game and each practice and that’s unfair to them because they work so hard outside of practice and games they don’t want to worry about not having money, so when Mark Walker said that the NCAA should pay the athletes 1,000 dollars each month he is right.
Paying college athletes has been a huge topic over the past few years, athletes are the reason why these colleges are bringing revenue to their programs. Most athletes' goal is to become professional and get paid for what they love doing but a couple of years ago college programs would not allow the athletes to get endorsement deals because it would take revenue out of their programs. College athletes should get paid because of the money they generate for the school and how much they have worked to get where they are. The amount of attention a college program gets when recruiting a top athlete is game-changing.
– The Current.” The student newspaper of Ossining High School, 11 January 2019, https://ohscurrent.org/archive/opinions-archive/2019/01/11/should-ncaa-athletes-be-paid/. Accessed 12 January 2023. “Why College Athletes Should Be Paid.” YouTube, 5 January 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-UBmhEL438. Accessed 12 January
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
Mary Polozzo Professor Margaret Bruemmer English 151 30 April 2023 Compensation for College Athletes Recently, more than ever before compensation for college athletes has been a highly debated topic. Many believe it is unnecessary for athletes playing for a school to be compensated, others argue that colleges should pay their athletes. This paper intends to argue the latter, athletes deserve to be paid for their work. Without a personal connection to college-level sports, it is unlikely that someone would be very knowledgeable on the topic of compensation for college athletes what they should know is that it is important that student-athletes are paid for their work; athletes have expenses they need to pay for and without compensation from
If larger schools can pay student athletes those sports teams will become overpowered, meaning it would ruin the entire purpose of the NCAA program. John Thelin, Ph.D., and Research Professor of History of Higher Education & Public Policy at the University of Kentucky, advocates for his side of the argument, about why college athletes should not be paid while being interviewed for a ProCons article. The professor expresses, “Paying salaries to players will increase [athletic] program expenditures without necessarily increasing revenues… [and] a handful of powerful programs will stand to gain in competition for athletic talent simply because they can afford to pay salaries. Others will mimic as they try to keep up but eventually will fall short in trying to outbid Auburn University, Florida State, the University of Southern California or the University of Texas in the college player arms race.” If these universities were able to start paying players many of the football and basketball teams would be unfair.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
Paying College Athletes This essay I’m going to talk about paying college athletes and why we should pay them a little bit of money. I think we should pay college athletes a little bit of money. I have some facts and reasons why we should to back up reason why we should. Here are my facts and reasons to support my opinion about this topic.
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.