Should college athletes be paid?
According to Hensley, Wallace said he typically had $180 each month after he paid his bills, This quote shows that college programs have enough money to pay college athletes they just decide not to because they get all the money and they do nothing but the players do everything they put their bodies on the line and they fight threw injuries every day to become better This is an issue because college players don’t know how their future will go or what they will be doing in their future but with a good program that pays them for what they do and a good coach who teaches them everything they will be good. College programs have the money to give out to players that's why they have all of these great places for
…show more content…
Many people know or have heard about college coaches and college programs getting a lot of money after each game, in 2019 the NCAA total athletic revenue among all of the athletic departments was 18.9 billion dollars. In 2020 U.S. Congressman Mark Walker set out a bill about college athletes getting paid for their names, images, and likeness and he wished that it would be voted on in 2020 and that in 2021 it might go into effect. In the article “NCAA clears the way for athletes to profit from names, images and likenesses” Mark Walker States “ college athletes should get profit off of their names and image and likenesses because athletic programs wouldn’t have to pay so much to them and he also states that the program they play for should pay them 1,000 dollars each month to keep the players interest high. Given this evidence, it can be seen that letting college players get paid off of their names and image and likenesses would benefit them because they wouldn’t have to worry about getting another job or struggle with money problems if the NCAA would pay them 1,000 dollars each month and that could also help the program out because they wouldn’t have to worry about paying them after each game. This Proves my claim because the NCAA is paid around 18.9 billion dollars each year from the athletic department and none of that goes to the athletes that they have put their bodies on the line for the program each game and each practice and that’s unfair to them because they work so hard outside of practice and games they don’t want to worry about not having money, so when Mark Walker said that the NCAA should pay the athletes 1,000 dollars each month he is right. If my claim wasn’t supported I would be fine because it's not fair to the athletes that have to work
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
The cartoon’s audience are the people that runs the school. Boris Drucker make an assumption about the people who will look at this cartoon by making the sports team feel good about themselves and it also shows that the school is not as greats as the sports teams. Which shows that the school needs to also focus on the academics of the students and not just all sports. The characters in this cartoon are a football player, a coach and a reporter.
Should College Athletes Be Paid? There are college athletes getting paid much much more than the average joe. Why and how do people feel about that? Although many feel that college athletes aren't mature enough to handle money themselves, college athletes should get paid because the athletes put their health and time on the line to play for a school and the school profits off of them in many ways. College athletes should be paid, because they’re putting their body on the line when they’re playing.
Many people have multiple perspectives about awards given out in young athletes sports. Some people believe that young athletes should be given awards just for participating in a sport. However, others think that awards should be given to the top athlete on a tea or the one who has improved the most, and experts have reasonable evidence to support both sides of the argument. The question is, which side do you support? Young athletes should get an award just for participating in a sport because it gives them motivation to keep working hard, because they are still young, and most of all, because if everyone gets an award, then no athlete can be favored more than the other.
In the article, “The Billion Dollar Industry that Has Never Paid its Money-Makers: The NCAA’s Attempt at Compensation Through Names, Images and Likeness” by law school graduate from Pennsylvania State University and Touro College, Christopher Palmieri, touches on the resemblance of student-athletes to professional athletes. He states, “Apparel deals, ticket sales, and school reputations have made it so that some college games have over one billion dollars at play when student-athletes gear up. Despite this, the NCAA still prevented all college athletes from making a single cent from their own popularity without facing serious repercussions. … The plaintiffs argue that it is unjust for the universities, apparel companies, and many others to profit from the hard work of these athletes without allowing them to earn money for themselves” (Palmieri 1607). These athletes give up so much of their time and work so hard, both physically and mentally, to only be rewarded with cheers and praises.
College Athletes Should Be Paid! Are you aware that despite colleges earning a substantial amount of money from sporting events, student-athletes are not compensated? Many college athletes are not compensated for their hard work. Recently, there have been controversies about whether or not college athletes should be paid. Some people assert that college athletes should not be paid because paying them will alter the atmosphere of the game.
Should student athletes really be paid? Imagine working 40 hours a week at a hospital during the pandemic risking your safety, For no paycheck that is similar to what these student athletes have to endure. Student athletes go to school then go to work outs straight after they barely have a chance to work at a job with all studying and sports. Thats like working during the pandemic without pay and still needing to pay bills,get food,and transportation. Not including all the inflation it’s nearly impossible but that's what these colleges expect.
Athletes work hard around the clock to excel in their sport in the hopes of receiving a scholarship. However, many of these athletes pay the price with the extreme demands they place on themselves. College athletes are beginning to push to receive financial compensation from the NCAA because of their efforts. While the NCAA argues against it, student-athletes at the collegiate level should receive compensation because playing a D1 sport requires immense amounts of time, athletes are constantly taken advantage of by the NCAA, and scholarships alone are not sufficient to support the athletes. Playing a sport in college undoubtedly requires substantial time and effort that could have been better spent doing schoolwork.
Over the past few years, the idea of paying college athletes has been a very hot and sought after topic to talk about. Many people desire and strive to one day be good enough at a sport that they can get a scholarship to continue their athletic careers. There has been many questions circulating in regards to if collegiate athletes should be paid to play for universities. Gaining an education and degree for cheaper than everyone else attending college should be more than enough to keep athletes playing for colleges. College athletes should not be paid to play their sport.
Should college athletes be paid? College athletes are paid too much because college athletes get paid more than people with jobs, they make more money in a few years than most people ever will, it’s a sport and not a job, however, college athletes are trained and are hard workers. As of 2022 college athletes make an average of $46 thousand a year. College athletes are paid too much. They make more than an average person with a job.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
Should college athletes be paid? Imagine getting a free scholarship, and playing for a team and heightening your chances of playing a professional sport. Well, college athletes have this opportunity. The first reason is that according to the NCAA, it provided 3.6 billion dollars in athletic scholarships. The next reason is Not all college athletes will make it pro, only a few so they should take advantage of the resources they have to learn.
Should pros be allowed to draft college athletes before they graduate. I believe that the pros shouldn’t be allowed. My reasoning is that players need time to develop & think about what’s best for them. Another reason is that players should graduate first so that if the sport they play doesn’t work out then they have a college degree for a back up career in something else. There are plenty of good reasons but something that players should think more about is the longer you stay in college the more developed & ready for the pro sport you dream of going into.
There is also proof that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) treats their athletes poorly because universities do not provide healthcare, and they do not allow their athletes to benefit on the biggest games of their careers. These athletes deserve to get paid because
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.