The battling of whether or not to pay college athletes has been on the table for a long time. NCAA has been fighting against those who believe that athletes should be paid for playing the sport. NCAA has won this case a few times before. It is unfair for the athletes to put in all the work and not get anything beneficial to them. The athletes who are not getting paid do not have hardly any freedom outside of practice. In the articles, “Should College Athletes be Paid” by Joe Nocera, “Should College Football Players Get Paid”, “Compensation for College Athletes”, and “Should College Athletes Be Paid to Play” by Kenneth Cooper, they explain the benefits and drawbacks to paying college athletes. Because colleges, coaches, and programs receive an outstanding amount of money, they should be able to get paid for their efforts. In fact, Coaches and NCAA get rich, while the athletes get nothing. The college athletes are responsible for the money NCAA and coaches receive, but they do not even get a penny for their hard work. Coaches and assistant coaches drown in money while the players get nothing: “The coaches for these teams earn millions… even the assistant coaches make hundreds of thousands… yet the labor force--and that’s what the …show more content…
College athletes are responsible for their education. School should be the priority first and not the sport. According to Nocera, “Paying students to play would turn them into employees, shifting their focus away from academics” (9). The college athletes work more than 60 hours a week just on practicing. This makes them exceed way above an average employee. College athletes who deserve to get paid is simply unfair: “According to those who support the idea of paying student athletes, this is inherently unfair” (Nocera 4). The college athletes are the reason why NCAA is rich with all the money. They do all the work to get the recognition for the brand they stand
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Life can be hard when you have to manage two lives. College athletes are living the life as full-time students and full-time athletes. This can be a very difficult task for college students. It is my position that college athletes (also sometimes called student athletes) should get paid while others might say that they should not be paid. I believe they should be paid because with their school life and athletic life they don’t have time for jobs.
"Over the last decade, the debate of whether or not college athletes should be paid has intensified, and many athletes, as well as coaches, have begun to advocate for the cause." (TIMES) Tyler Harnett, a writer at the Huffington Post, took his standpoint on the topic in the article "Why College Athletes Should be Paid," which clearly states his claim, college athletes should be paid. Personally, I disagree with Harnett's viewpoint and I don't believe college athletes should be paid due to education, funding, and overall fairness. To summarize Harnett's article, he starts by talking about his opponents and their viewpoints on the situation, "They are already getting a scholarship, don't be greedy."
College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.
College athletes should get paid to pay because they dedicate a lot of time to their teams, they do not have time for a job, the school receives a great amount of money from the games that they perform in, and a salary would help student-athletes learn how to
This raises the question: do college athletes deserve to be paid? To the untrained eye, college athletes receive an education, coaches make a living, and the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) keeps the well oiled machine running. The NCAA is simply an association of institutions and members which provide pathways of opportunity
This has created an argument that leaves people questioning, Do college students deserve a paycheck? College athletes should get paid because they work just like everyone else , They themselves bring in an incredible amount of money that they don’t get but for the school, and How about if paying them allows them to start paying attention on financial expenses The first reason why college athletes should get paid is because they are working just like everyone else “College athletes are just like all other hard- www.scholastic
A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.
NCAA has various views on college athletes getting paid. On NCAA.org, they push for more success in academics than in athletics. School work will be put before the time spent on the court to ensure that they know their main purpose for going to that specific college, according to NCAA. For the people who like to give their opinions on the situation, the past years have seen good days and bad days in where as people, even fans,think that college athletes are somehow not given enough benefits. NCAA states, Most of the money made off of the athletic program doesn’t go to the people that actually make the profits rise.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their
The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.
Between Tv deals, ticket sales, and jersey sales there is plenty of money to go around in college athletics, and it is time that the NCAA steps up and compensates athletes. College athletes are stuck in a brief conflict where they think they deserve to be paid just like the pros do. They consider their sport as a job and think they deserve to be paid just like the coaches do. Colleges make a lot of their money through the sports department. Ticket sales are a big way colleges bring in big money.