Paying college athletes has been a huge topic over the past few years, athletes are the reason why these colleges are bringing revenue to their programs. Most athletes' goal is to become professional and get paid for what they love doing but a couple of years ago college programs would not allow the athletes to get endorsement deals because it would take revenue out of their programs. College athletes should get paid because of the money they generate for the school and how much they have worked to get where they are.
The amount of attention a college program gets when recruiting a top athlete is game-changing. There are proven facts that college programs' revenue increase due to selling more tickets or selling more merchandise. The article,
…show more content…
John and Jr Thompson the writers of “Let's Drop The Charade and Pay College Athletes” talks about how there are more options instead of just college. As they were talking about different routes they mention, “Most of them will go straight to the N.B.A., the G League or overseas — or just stay home and work out” (Thompson par. 4). Athletes that are determined to make it to the professional level are great opportunities for those who want to make it the next step. These leagues have many beneficial opportunities such as they get paid, focusing more on their skill, having no distractions, and playing in a high-level competition. Not only are there other programs, but colleges also focus too much on education. Most athletes have a goal and colleges stir them in a different direction for education. In the article it says, “I believe it’s time for the N.C.A.A. to stop pretending that education is its top priority and pay college athletes” (Thompson par. 1). Top recruits go to those big colleges only for the recognition. Big colleges get nationally televised and those athletes take advantage of that so other recruiters can look at them. Those top athletes are not focused on education because they know they can make it big, …show more content…
Not only do they pay for the funds, but top colleges also create the most money, so it is unfair to those colleges that can not afford to get top recruits. In the article “Don’t Pay College Athletes” Cody McDavis the writer states, “A handful of big sports programs would pay top dollar for a select few athletes, while almost every other college would get caught up in a bidding war it couldn't afford” (McDavis par. 1). This leads to an unfair battle because the players are going to go wherever the money is at. Also, unfair matches because if top recruits go to the same college it would create a super team and become a pay-to-win. As well as colleges can outbid other colleges but another reason is that colleges give out scholarships. Colleges such as UCLA, LSU, Duke, and Notre Dame are not cheap schools to attend. As that being said in the article National Collegiate Athletic Association says, “most of those revenues are spent covering operating expenses for the school's athletic programs and paying tuition for their student-athletes. The majority of Division I colleges in the N.C.A.A. operate at a loss. In fact, among the roughly 350 athletic departments in the N.C.A.A.'s Division I, only about 24 schools have generated more revenue than expenses in recent years” (McDavis par. 2). Colleges already do enough for the player and spend thousands of
although athletes work tough from day to night time every day they can’t preserve on making a living for something they may be getting to know for or their future dreams, and because of this, college athletes need to now not receives a commission because there need to be equality, or in any other case it will purpose issues with different fields and organizations too. For colleges to be a fair place every class needs to give the same education without making it more valuable, and this is for everyone's future to be better! For our school to not end up in additional costs we should not expect something like this from our universities. Don’t overlook athletes' needs and passion for them to clearly get what they deserve in the long
Are they getting any outcome for their work? College athletes are among the most highly skilled and talented individuals in their respective sports. They train for countless hours, often
College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.
They believe that the players are already being pay with exposure, some of the players go on to play in the NFL and other major leagues where they make millions of dollars. Along with the exposure, they are also given a major amount of grants and scholarships for their education. NCAA revenue numbers aside, it is true all college athletes are amateur-status. According to the NCAA's data released every fiscal year, out of the six major college sports (baseball, men's and women's basketball, men's soccer, hockey and football) the only sport with more than seven percent of its athletes go pro after college was baseball. Only 1.6 percent of college football players end up being drafted into the NFL.
This is another valid claim for why College athletes should be paid. The average scholarship is close to $18,000, which does not cover all of the expenses of attending a private school or out-of-state tuition and fees at the majority of public educational facilities. In other words, the majority of collegiate athletes on scholarships don't get a free ride (Drozdowski [#1]). Also, the average $18,000 scholarship, according to the U.S. News & World Report, is less than the typical out-of-state tuition and fee cost at public colleges. College athletes frequently have to pay for their own rooms, meals, books, and living expenses (Should [#2]).
If these colleges had to raise tuition prices it would make it very difficult for non-athletes to pay for their tuition. This could even sway non-athletes away from attending these
However, this argument is flawed, as there are limits to a college institution's funding, and these limits would eventually overrule a student body trying to maintain funding for their sport, since the college would inevitably be pressured to generate more income through some way in
Also amount of walk-on athletes that participate in sporting activities. Many student athletes in football and men’s basketball, most of the time, they bring in the revenue for the university compared to other sports. Such as, Ohio State University brought in 170,789,158 dollars and their expenses were
I looked at the highest-paid college athletes and the top 10 go from 3.4 million to 1.4 million a year, how do they get paid you may ask, they run branded training clinics,
It is something that the public forgets often. They play their sport in packed stadiums of adoring fans, their games are broadcast live on television. But they are still students. And college students have expenses that need to be paid somehow. New York Times article Supreme Court Backs Payments to Student-Athletes in NCAA Case states “Throughout its 115-year history, the NCAA has largely defended the notion that students should play sports in exchange for no more than a scholarship, books, room and board and, more recently, the estimated cost of attending college, a figure that can include travel and other living expenses.
"College athletes make their schools millions of dollars, so they should naturally receive a cut…everyone around them makes money. But the students (athletes)… receive nothing" (Drowzdowski). College athletes like Paige Bueckers, Azzi Fudd, and Aaliyah Edwards bring attention to Uconn. No one receives a single penny for all the gear and tickets sold with their names on them. The schools get money by selling these, so the school makes money off its athletes.
This shows how cruel and greedy colleges are to the people making the money for them. Another reality is that college athletics generate billions of dollars every year, and everyone wants a piece of the action. Everyone, that is, except the players.” To conclude, this shows why college athletes should get just a little portion of the money they make for the colleges because it will affect how they play in a very positive
The final reason is that Student Athletes Would Value Payment Over Education. College athletes have had a lot of money given to them in scholarships. According to the NCAA, they have given out 3.6 billion dollars in athletic scholarships annually to more than 180,000 student-athletes which is about 200,000 dollars per year. According
Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their
What college athletes don’t understand is that they are getting exposure to getting a professional contract. If that doesn’t work they will always have a college education to lean back on. They give generous scholarships to top student athletes receive, covering their tuition and most